| Literature DB >> 32466584 |
Alba Diaz-Martinez1, Javier Mas-Cabo1, Gema Prats-Boluda1, Javier Garcia-Casado1, Karen Cardona-Urrego1, Rogelio Monfort-Ortiz2, Angel Lopez-Corral2, Maria De Arriba-Garcia2, Alfredo Perales2, Yiyao Ye-Lin1.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the major causes of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide, with uterine atony being the most common origin. Currently there are no obstetrical techniques available for monitoring postpartum uterine dynamics, as tocodynamometry is not able to detect weak uterine contractions. In this study, we explored the feasibility of monitoring postpartum uterine activity by non-invasive electrohysterography (EHG), which has been proven to outperform tocodynamometry in detecting uterine contractions during pregnancy. A comparison was made of the temporal, spectral, and non-linear parameters of postpartum EHG characteristics of vaginal deliveries and elective cesareans. In the vaginal delivery group, EHG obtained a significantly higher amplitude and lower kurtosis of the Hilbert envelope, and spectral content was shifted toward higher frequencies than in the cesarean group. In the non-linear parameters, higher values were found for the fractal dimension and lower values for Lempel-Ziv, sample entropy and spectral entropy in vaginal deliveries suggesting that the postpartum EHG signal is extremely non-linear but more regular and predictable than in a cesarean. The results obtained indicate that postpartum EHG recording could be a helpful tool for earlier detection of uterine atony and contribute to better management of prophylactic uterotonic treatment for PPH prevention.Entities:
Keywords: electrohysterogram; postpartum hemorrhage; signal characterization; uterine myoelectrical activity; uterotonic therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32466584 PMCID: PMC7308960 DOI: 10.3390/s20113023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Electrodes positioning for postpartum uterine myoelectrical recording.
Mean and standard deviation values of the obstetric data and vital sign variation before and 24 h after delivery in the study population. Values in bold indicate significant differences between groups (α = 0.05). CSR: elective caesarean delivery; VGN: vaginal delivery; BMI: Body Mass Index; CF: Cardiac Frequency; SAP: Systolic Arterial Pressure; DAP: Diastolic Arterial Pressure.
| CSR (μ ± σ) | VGN (μ ± σ) | |
|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | 32.80 ± 5.70 | 33.92 ± 7.95 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 28.40 ± 4.90 | 27.52 ± 4.10 |
| Parity | 0.05 ± 0.22 | 0.23 ± 0.44 |
| Previous caesarean |
|
|
| Fetal weight (g) | 3279 ± 386 | 3326 ± 365 |
| ΔHb (g/dL) | −1.14 ± 0.94 | −1.43 ± 1.25 |
| ΔHematocrit (%) | −3.94 ± 2.77 | −3.39 ± 4.22 |
| ΔCF (bpm) | 3.85 ± 13.68 | −0.54 ± 8.36 |
| ΔSAP (mmHg) | −18.15 ± 20.12 | −4.31 ± 15.33 |
| ΔDAP (mmHg) | −5.30 ± 11.36 | −2.23 ± 17.54 |
| ΔS02 (%) | 0.00 ± 2.12 | 0.70 ± 1.57 |
Figure 2Example of postpartum electrohysterography (EHG) bipolar recordings from women who delivered vaginally (VGN, upper trace) and by cesarean section (CSR, lower trace).
Figure 3Distribution of postpartum EHG parameters for cesarean (CSR) and vaginal (VGN) deliveries.
Mean and standard deviation values of the electrohysterography characteristics of VGN and CSR groups. Values in bold indicate the statistical difference between groups (α = 0.05). Effect size values are marked with (**) if large and with (*) if medium. KHE: Kurtosis of the Hilbert Envelope; KFD: Katz Fractal Dimension.
| CSR (μ ± σ) | VGN (μ ± σ) | Effect Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak-to-peak amp. (μV) |
|
|
| 0.78 ** |
| KHE |
|
|
| 1.18 ** |
| Median frequency (Hz) | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.086 | 0.76 ** |
| Dominant frequency (Hz) | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.258 | 0.42 * |
| NE |
|
|
| 0.80 ** |
| Binary Lempel-Ziv | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.37 ± 0.08 | 0.155 | 0.31 * |
| Sample Entropy | 0.92 ± 0.18 | 0.88 ± 0.23 | 0.451 | 0.19 |
| Spectral Entropy |
|
|
| 0.69 ** |
| KFD |
|
|
| 1.00 ** |
Both median frequency (VGN 0.32 ± 0.01 vs. CSR 0.31 ± 0.02) and dominant frequency (VGN 0.26 ± 0.02 vs. CSR 0.25 ± 0.02 Hz) of the spectral parameters were slightly higher in the VGN than CSR group and no statistical differences were found, with effect sizes of 0.76 and 0.42 correspondingly. Statistical difference between VGN and CSR spectral parameters was obtained for NE (VGN 0.34 ± 0.03 vs. CSR 0.31 ± 0.04, p-value= 0.04 and effect size of 0.8).