Literature DB >> 29120067

Review of patient decision-making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

M C Genoff Garzon1, L R Rubin1, M Lobel2, J Stelling3,4, L M Pastore4.   

Abstract

The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro-genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision-making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty-five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic-variant-free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision-making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision-making process, and suggestions are offered.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PGD; decision making; ethics; genetic counseling; health attitudes; knowledge; practice; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; psychology; reproductive endocrinology and infertility

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29120067     DOI: 10.1111/cge.13174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  14 in total

Review 1.  Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success?

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Mindy S Christianson; Bailey McGuinness; Kamaria Cayton Vaught; Jacqueline Y Maher; William G Kearns
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  The cost of a euploid embryo identified from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a counseling tool.

Authors:  Randi H Goldman; Catherine Racowsky; Leslie V Farland; Janis H Fox; Santiago Munné; Lia Ribustello; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  A systematic review of the views of healthcare professionals on the scope of preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors:  Maria Siermann; Zoë Claesen; Laurent Pasquier; Taneli Raivio; Olga Tšuiko; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Pascal Borry
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.

Authors:  Shachar Zuckerman; Sigal Gooldin; David A Zeevi; Gheona Altarescu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Pre-implantation genetic testing: decisional factors to accept or decline among in vitro fertilization patients.

Authors:  Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Leslie Francis; Melinda Fagan; Naomi Riches; Isabella Canada; Alena Wilson; Amber Mathiesen; Maya Sabatello; Shawn Gurtcheff; Erica Johnstone; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  In vitro fertilisation with preimplantation genetic testing: the need for expanded insurance coverage.

Authors:  Madison K Kilbride
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Rozemarijn Snoek; Marijn F Stokman; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Theodora C van Tilborg; Cindy E Simcox; Aimée D C Paulussen; Jos C M F Dreesen; Franka van Reekum; A Titia Lely; Nine V A M Knoers; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Albertien M van Eerde
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M).

Authors:  J Zhang; L R Rubin; H Zierhut; L M Pastore
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Predictive Prenatal Diagnosis for Infantile-onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease Because of Interleukin-10 Signalling Defects.

Authors:  Ziqing Ye; Wenhui Hu; Bingbing Wu; Yueping Zhang; Caixia Lei; Isabelle Williams; Dror S Shouval; Hirokazu Kanegane; Kyung Mo Kim; Lissy de Ridder; Neil Shah; Galina Ling; Baruch Yerushalmi; Daniel Kotlarz; Scott Snapper; Ruth Horn; Christoph Klein; Aleixo M Muise; Ying Huang; Holm H Uhlig
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Shawn Gurtcheff; Naomi Riches; Melinda Fagan; Maya Sabatello; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  Ther Adv Reprod Health       Date:  2020-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.