| Literature DB >> 32461926 |
Catherine Drogou1,2, Fabien Sauvet1,2, Mégane Erblang1,2, Liselot Detemmerman3, Céline Derbois4, Marie Claire Erkel1, Anne Boland4, Jean François Deleuze4, Danielle Gomez-Merino1,2, Mounir Chennaoui1,2.
Abstract
Genetic variations contribute to phenotypic individual vulnerabilities to sleep debt, particularly for five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Loop-mediated isothermal amplification and melting curve analysis (LAMP-MC) is a recently developed method to characterize SNPs. The aim of present study was to evaluate the LAMP-MC method on blood and buccal cells for detection of five SNPs of interest in healthy humans. We first analyzed signals obtained from LAMP-MC method on 42 samples. Then we compared the results with those of referent TaqMan method. The LAMP-MC method produced specific melting curves for the five SNPs. A high concordance of genotyping results was observed between the two methods for rs5751876_ADORA2A, rs1800629_TNF-α, rs73598374_ADA and rs228697_PER3 in blood and saliva (Cohen's kappa coefficient >0.80). A good agreement ( = 0.61) was observed for rs4680_COMT in blood only. LAMP-MC is a simple and reliable method to study genetic influences on health, sleep debt-related performance impairments and countermeasures.Entities:
Keywords: Loop-mediated isothermal amplification; Melting curve; SNP detection; Sleep debt
Year: 2020 PMID: 32461926 PMCID: PMC7240324 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Fig. 1LAMP melting curves of blood samples for the 5 tested SNPs. A) rs5751876 ADORA2A, B) rs1800629 TNF-alpha, C) rs73598374 ADA, D) rs4680 COMT and E) rs22897 PER3. Signals from homozygous subjects are represented by yellow and blue lines, signals from heterozygous subjects are represented by green lines. Red and pink lines correspond respectively to positive and negative controls (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Observed melting peak temperatures from 42 samples.
| SNP | Mean | Observed range | Observed range size | LaCAR MDX range acceptance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs5751876 ADORA2A | ||||
| C allele (n = 39) | 60.98 | 60.66 – 61.77 | 1.11 | 59.6 – 62.6 |
| T allele (n = 26) | 51.52 | 51.18 – 52.31 | 1.13 | 50.2 – 53.2 |
| TNF-α rs1800629 | ||||
| G allele (n = 39) | 58.65 | 58.05 – 59.47 | 1.42 | 57.1 – 60.1 |
| A allele (n = 11) | 52.24 | 51.52 – 53.46 | 1.94 | 50.8 – 53.8 |
| rs73598374 ADA | ||||
| C allele (n = 42) | 59.66 | 58.37 – 60.49 | 2.12 | 58.1 – 61.1 |
| T allele (n = 7) | 47.67 | 47.41 – 48.02 | 0.61 | 45.8 – 48.8 |
| rs4680 COMT | ||||
| G allele (n = 16) | 64.18 | 63.45 – 64.63 | 1.18 | 62.8 – 65.8 |
| A allele (n = 18) | 58.43 | 57.45 – 58.99 | 1.54 | 57.0 – 60.0 |
| rs228697 PER3 | ||||
| C allele (n = 40) | 44.80 | 43.65 – 46.06 | 2.41 | 43.1 – 46.1 |
| G allele (n = 5) | 60.97 | 60.67 – 61.29 | 0.62 | 59.0 – 62.0 |
All data are in °C.
Analysis of assay precision (n = 6).
| Intra-assay precision | Inter-assay precision | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tm mean (°C) | CV (%) | Tm mean (°C) | CV (%) | |
| rs5751876 ADORA2A | ||||
| C allele | 60.95 | 0.34 | 61.00 | 0.49 |
| T allele | 51.50 | 0.38 | 51.61 | 0.46 |
| rs1800629 TNF-α | ||||
| G allele | 58.55 | 0.39 | 58.67 | 0.71 |
| A allele | 51.98 | 0.45 | 52.12 | 0.87 |
| rs73598374 ADA | ||||
| C allele | 59.84 | 0.45 | 59.63 | 0.67 |
| T allele | 47.56 | 0.88 | 47.57 | 1.07 |
| rs4680 COMT | ||||
| G allele | 64.28 | 0.38 | 64.06 | 0.37 |
| A allele | 58.46 | 0.39 | 58.37 | 0.31 |
| rs228697 PER3 | ||||
| C allele | 45.58 | 0.44 | 44.60 | 1.24 |
| G allele | 61.36 | 0.38 | 60.79 | 0.33 |
Tm: melting peak temperature; CV: Coefficient of variation.
Genotypes frequencies.
| Gene | Reference SNP | Allele (Wild/Mutated) | Frequency W/W | Frequency W/M | Frequency M/M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADORA2A | rs5751876 | C/T | 33.3 | 59.3 | 7.4 |
| (35.9) | (45.6) | (18.5) | |||
| [37.4] | [47.1] | [15.5] | |||
| TNF-α | rs1800629 | G/A | 75.5 | 18.9 | 5.6 |
| (74.1) | (24.6) | (1.3) | |||
| [74.4] | [24.5] | [1.2] | |||
| ADA | rs73598374 | C/T | 87.2 | 12.8 | 0 |
| (89.2) | (10.4) | (0.4) | |||
| [88.1] | [11.5] | [0.4] | |||
| COMT | rs4680 | G/A | 29.2 | 45.8 | 25 |
| (30.4) | (49) | (20.6) | |||
| [26.4] | [47.1] | [26.4] | |||
| PER3 | rs228697 | C/G | 89.8 | 10.2 | 0 |
| (82.7) | (16.4) | (0.9) | |||
| [81.7] | [17.3] | [ |
Data in percent (%) of the n = 42 subjects, % of the 1023 European volunteers in parentheses and % of the 1000 Genomes project in brackets. W is the wild allele, M is the mutated allele and W/M correspond to heterozygous subject.
Concordance between genotyping results of LAMP-MC method with the referent method.
| Gene /SNP | Sample type | Sample number | Interpreted melting curves | Valid result | False result | Concordance (%) | Cohen’s κ Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADORA2A / | Blood | 30 | 30 | 29 | 1 | 96.7 | 0.936 |
| rs5751876 | Bu Cells | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100 | 1 |
| TNF-α / | Blood | 30 | 29 | 28 | 1 | 96.6 | 0.910 |
| rs1800629 | Bu Cells | 12 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 91.7 | 0.824 |
| ADA / | Blood | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 100 | 1 |
| rs73598374 | Bu Cells | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100 | 1 |
| COMT / | Blood | 30 | 29 | 25 | 4 | 86.2 | 0.610 |
| rs4680 | Bu Cells | 12 | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| PER3 / | Blood | 30 | 28 | 27 | 1 | 96.4 | 0.870 |
| rs228697 | Bu Cells | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100 | 1 |
Bu Cells means Buccal cells.
Heterozygous not detected (one of the two peaks too weak).
Cohen’s kappa values are ranked as minimal agreement (κ<0.20), weak agreement (κ<0.40), moderate agreement (κ<0.60), good agreement (κ<0.80) and excellent agreement (κ≥0.80).