Literature DB >> 32461751

Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future.

Samaneh Babaee1, Daniel H Loughlin2.   

Abstract

Natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC) turbines with carbon capture and storage (CCS) could be an important source of low-carbon electricity in the future. Factors affecting the market competitiveness of NGCC-CCS are examined by conducting a sensitivity analysis using the MARKet ALlocation energy system optimization model. The results indicate that widespread deployment of NGCC-CCS is better suited for a 30% energy system greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction trajectory than for a more stringent 50% reduction trajectory. Methane leakage rate, efficiency penalty, carbon dioxide (CO2) capture rate, and natural gas price are found to be the strongest factors influencing optimal NGCC-CCS deployment, in that order. NGCC plays an important role in meeting mid-term GHG targets across all model runs. A large portion of NGCC capacity is later retrofit with CCS, indicating that NGCC can be both a bridge to a low-carbon future and an integral part of that future. Thus, retrofitability and siting near CO2storage should be considerations as new NGCC capacity is built. Regional results indicate that NGCC-CCS deployment would be greatest in the West South Central region, followed by the East North Central region. In a business-as-usual scenario, both regions have considerable electricity production from fossil fuels. Conventional coal and gas capacity are displaced under a GHG reduction target, opening the door for NGCC-CCS in these regions. NGCC-CCS market penetration is projected to have a mixed impact on air pollutant emissions and energy-related water consumption. Whether impacts are positive or negative depends on the technologies displaced by NGCC-CCS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofits; Energy system modeling; Greenhouse gas mitigation; Natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC)

Year:  2017        PMID: 32461751      PMCID: PMC7252577          DOI: 10.1007/s10098-017-1479-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy        ISSN: 1618-954X            Impact factor:   3.636


  5 in total

1.  The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity.

Authors:  James H Williams; Andrew DeBenedictis; Rebecca Ghanadan; Amber Mahone; Jack Moore; William R Morrow; Snuller Price; Margaret S Torn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Marginal abatement cost curve for nitrogen oxides incorporating controls, renewable electricity, energy efficiency, and fuel switching.

Authors:  Daniel H Loughlin; Alexander J Macpherson; Katherine R Kaufman; Brian N Keaveny
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Paul B Shepson; Renee L Santoro; Jed P Sparks; Robert W Howarth; Anthony R Ingraffea; Maria O L Cambaliza; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Kenneth J Davis; Brian H Stirm; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas.

Authors:  Haewon McJeon; Jae Edmonds; Nico Bauer; Leon Clarke; Brian Fisher; Brian P Flannery; Jérôme Hilaire; Volker Krey; Giacomo Marangoni; Raymond Mi; Keywan Riahi; Holger Rogner; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.

Authors:  Xi Lu; Jackson Salovaara; Michael B McElroy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 9.028

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evolution of the United States Energy System and Related Emissions under Varying Social and Technological Development Paradigms: Plausible Scenarios for Use in Robust Decision Making.

Authors:  Kristen E Brown; Troy A Hottle; Rubenka Bandyopadhyay; Samaneh Babaee; Rebecca S Dodder; P Ozge Kaplan; Carol S Lenox; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO2 capture, facilities for enhanced oil recovery CO2 markets and geologic CO2 storage?

Authors:  James Edmonds; Christopher Nichols; Misha Adamantiades; John Bistline; Jonathan Huster; Gokul Iyer; Nils Johnson; Pralit Patel; Sharon Showalter; Nadja Victor; Stephanie Waldhoff; Marshall Wise; Frances Wood
Journal:  Energy Policy       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 7.576

3.  Understanding Technology, Fuel, Market and Policy Drivers for New York State's Power Sector Transformation.

Authors:  Mine Isik; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.