Literature DB >> 35444362

Could congressionally mandated incentives lead to deployment of large-scale CO2 capture, facilities for enhanced oil recovery CO2 markets and geologic CO2 storage?

James Edmonds1, Christopher Nichols2, Misha Adamantiades3, John Bistline4, Jonathan Huster1, Gokul Iyer1, Nils Johnson4, Pralit Patel1, Sharon Showalter5, Nadja Victor2, Stephanie Waldhoff1, Marshall Wise1, Frances Wood5.   

Abstract

In passing the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, Congress reformed and strengthened a section of the tax code, 45Q, which provides tax credits of up to $35/ton CO2 for the capture and utilization of CO2 in qualifying applications such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and up to $50/ton CO2 for CO2 that is captured and permanently stored in a geologic repository. Earlier versions of the tax credit with lower credit values generated limited interest. This change to the tax code could potentially alter U.S. energy systems. This paper examines the effect of the increased 45Q credits on CO2 capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) deployment in the United States and on petroleum and power production. A range of potential outcomes is explored using five modeling tools. The paper goes on to explore the potential impact of possible modifications of the current tax credit including extension of its availability in time, the period over which 45Q tax credits can be utilized for any given asset and increases in the value of the credit as well as interactions with technology availability and carbon taxation. The paper concludes that 45Q tax credits could stimulate additional CCUS beyond that which is already underway.

Entities:  

Keywords:  45Q tax credits; CCUS; CO2 capture; EOR; Enhanced oil recovery; Utilization and storage

Year:  2020        PMID: 35444362      PMCID: PMC9016633          DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Energy Policy        ISSN: 0301-4215            Impact factor:   7.576


  5 in total

1.  CLIMATE POLICY. Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?

Authors:  Allen A Fawcett; Gokul C Iyer; Leon E Clarke; James A Edmonds; Nathan E Hultman; Haewon C McJeon; Joeri Rogelj; Reed Schuler; Jameel Alsalam; Ghassem R Asrar; Jared Creason; Minji Jeong; James McFarland; Anupriya Mundra; Wenjing Shi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Electric sector policy, technological change, and U.S. emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project.

Authors:  John E Bistline; Elke Hodson; Charles G Rossmann; Jared Creason; Brian Murray; Alexander R Barron
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2018

3.  Exploring the role of natural gas power plants with carbon capture and storage as a bridge to a low-carbon future.

Authors:  Samaneh Babaee; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Clean Technol Environ Policy       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel L Sanchez; Nils Johnson; Sean T McCoy; Peter A Turner; Katharine J Mach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  State-level drivers of future fine particulate matter mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Yang Ou; Steven J Smith; J Jason West; Christopher G Nolte; Daniel H Loughlin
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.793

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Anderson; David C Rode; Haibo Zhai; Paul S Fischbeck
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 11.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.