Literature DB >> 32458907

Machine learning-aided quantification of antibody-based cancer immunotherapy by natural killer cells in microfluidic droplets.

Saheli Sarkar1, Wenjing Kang, Songyao Jiang, Kunpeng Li, Somak Ray, Ed Luther, Alexander R Ivanov, Yun Fu, Tania Konry.   

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells have emerged as an effective alternative option to T cell-based immunotherapies, particularly against liquid (hematologic) tumors. However, the effectiveness of NK cell therapy has been less than optimal for solid tumors, partly due to the heterogeneity in target interaction leading to variable anti-tumor cytotoxicity. This paper describes a microfluidic droplet-based cytotoxicity assay for quantitative comparison of immunotherapeutic NK-92 cell interaction with various types of target cells. Machine learning algorithms were developed to assess the dynamics of individual effector-target cell pair conjugation and target death in droplets in a semi-automated manner. Our results showed that while short contacts were sufficient to induce potent killing of hematological cancer cells, long-lasting stable conjugation with NK-92 cells was unable to kill HER2+ solid tumor cells (SKOV3, SKBR3) significantly. NK-92 cells that were engineered to express FcγRIII (CD16) mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) selectively against HER2+ cells upon addition of Herceptin (trastuzumab). The requirement of CD16, Herceptin and specific pre-incubation temperature served as three inputs to generate a molecular logic function with HER2+ cell death as the output. Mass proteomic analysis of the two effector cell lines suggested differential changes in adhesion, exocytosis, metabolism, transport and activation of upstream regulators and cytotoxicity mediators, which can be utilized to regulate specific functionalities of NK-92 cells in future. These results suggest that this semi-automated single cell assay can reveal the variability and functional potency of NK cells and may be used to optimize immunotherapeutic efficacy for preclinical analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32458907      PMCID: PMC7938931          DOI: 10.1039/d0lc00158a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  48 in total

1.  The effect of temperature on the binding kinetics and equilibrium constants of monoclonal antibodies to cell surface antigens.

Authors:  R W Johnstone; S M Andrew; M P Hogarth; G A Pietersz; I F McKenzie
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Classification of human natural killer cells based on migration behavior and cytotoxic response.

Authors:  Bruno Vanherberghen; Per E Olofsson; Elin Forslund; Michal Sternberg-Simon; Mohammad Ali Khorshidi; Simon Pacouret; Karolin Guldevall; Monika Enqvist; Karl-Johan Malmberg; Ramit Mehr; Björn Önfelt
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Transient and stable vector transfection: Pitfalls, off-target effects, artifacts.

Authors:  Aleksei A Stepanenko; Henry H Heng
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 5.657

4.  ADCC employing an NK cell line (haNK) expressing the high affinity CD16 allele with avelumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody.

Authors:  Caroline Jochems; James W Hodge; Massimo Fantini; Kwong Y Tsang; Amanda J Vandeveer; James L Gulley; Jeffrey Schlom
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Proteome characterization of human NK-92 cells identifies novel IFN-alpha and IL-15 target genes.

Authors:  Riitta Rakkola; Sampsa Matikainen; Tuula A Nyman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  Formation and function of the lytic NK-cell immunological synapse.

Authors:  Jordan S Orange
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  Resistance to Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Paula R Pohlmann; Ingrid A Mayer; Ray Mernaugh
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Krämer; Jeff Green; Jack Pollard; Stuart Tugendreich
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  Machine learning and image-based profiling in drug discovery.

Authors:  Christian Scheeder; Florian Heigwer; Michael Boutros
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2018-08

10.  Segmentation of Image Data from Complex Organotypic 3D Models of Cancer Tissues with Markov Random Fields.

Authors:  Sean Robinson; Laurent Guyon; Jaakko Nevalainen; Mervi Toriseva; Malin Åkerfelt; Matthias Nees
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Is microfluidics the "assembly line" for CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing?

Authors:  Fatemeh Ahmadi; Angela B V Quach; Steve C C Shih
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Hydrogels for Single-Cell Microgel Production: Recent Advances and Applications.

Authors:  B M Tiemeijer; J Tel
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 3.  Scalable Signature-Based Molecular Diagnostics Through On-chip Biomarker Profiling Coupled with Machine Learning.

Authors:  John Molinski; Amogha Tadimety; Alison Burklund; John X J Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 4.  Microfluidics for Peptidomics, Proteomics, and Cell Analysis.

Authors:  Rui Vitorino; Sofia Guedes; João Pinto da Costa; Václav Kašička
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  Machine Learning-Driven Multiobjective Optimization: An Opportunity of Microfluidic Platforms Applied in Cancer Research.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Sijing Li; Yaling Liu
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.