| Literature DB >> 32456407 |
Kyung Hyun Bae1, Yong Ho Jo1, Dong Ryul Lee1, Jungun Lee1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Handgrip strength (HGS) is a good predictor of adverse health outcomes in later life. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether HGS trajectory patterns were associated with all-cause mortality among older adults in Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Aged; Hand Strength; Korea; Mortality
Year: 2020 PMID: 32456407 PMCID: PMC7884901 DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.19.0140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Fam Med ISSN: 2005-6443
Characteristics of male participants according to HGS trajectory
| Characteristic | Low HGS | Lower middle HGS | Upper middle HGS | High HGS | P-value[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants | 136 | 482 | 575 | 124 | |
| Age (y) | 76.3±0.44 | 72.8±0.22 | 70.4±0.20 | 68.2±0.44 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.4±0.25 | 22.3±0.12 | 23.0±0.11 | 24.0±0.24 | <0.001 |
| Chronic disease | |||||
| Hypertension | 53 (39.0) | 165 (34.2) | 205 (35.7) | 33 (26.6) | 0.15 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 22 (16.2) | 80 (16.6) | 79 (13.7) | 13 (10.5) | 0.22 |
| Chronic lung disease | 14 (10.3) | 20 (4.2) | 23 (4.0) | 2 (1.6) | 0.11 |
| Chronic liver disease | 1 (0.7) | 10 (2.1) | 11 (1.9) | 1 (0.8) | 0.80 |
| Heart disease | 10 (7.4) | 35 (7.3) | 32 (5.6) | 6 (4.8) | 0.99 |
| Stroke | 15 (11.0) | 20 (4.15) | 21 (3.7) | 3 (2.4) | 0.48 |
| Education | 0.09 | ||||
| Elementary school or lower | 102 (75.0) | 283 (58.7) | 264 (45.9) | 37 (29.8) | |
| Middle school | 13 (9.6) | 74 (15.4) | 93 (16.2) | 18 (14.5) | |
| High school | 15 (11.0) | 81 (16.8) | 143 (24.9) | 49 (39.5) | |
| University or higher | 6 (4.4) | 44 (9.1) | 74 (12.9) | 20 (16.1) | |
| Marital status | 0.84 | ||||
| Living with spouse | 119 (87.5) | 435 (90.2) | 525 (91.3) | 116 (93.5) | |
| Not living with spouse | 17 (12.5) | 47 (9.8) | 50 (8.7) | 8 (6.5) | |
| Self-rated health | <0.001 | ||||
| Good | 9 (6.6) | 109 (22.6) | 218 (37.9) | 63 (50.8) | |
| Moderate | 37 (27.2) | 197 (40.9) | 236 (41.0) | 49 (39.5) | |
| Bad | 90 (66.2) | 176 (36.5) | 121 (21.0) | 12 (9.7) | |
| Smoking status | 0.19 | ||||
| Non-smoker | 51 (37.5) | 205 (42.5) | 264 (45.9) | 45 (36.3) | |
| Ex-smoker | 42 (30.9) | 115 (23.9) | 139 (24.2) | 35 (28.2) | |
| Current smoker | 43 (31.6) | 162 (33.6) | 172 (29.9) | 44 (35.5) | |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.59 | ||||
| No | 81 (59.6) | 216 (44.8) | 253 (44.0) | 47 (37.9) | |
| Yes | 55 (40.4) | 266 (55.2) | 322 (56.0) | 77 (62.1) | |
| Regular exercise | 0.21 | ||||
| Yes | 32 (23.5) | 189 (39.2) | 249 (43.3) | 68 (54.8) | |
| No | 104 (76.5) | 293 (60.8) | 326 (56.7) | 56 (45.2) | |
| Depression, CES-D[ | 3.6±0.24 | 3.0±0.11 | 2.9±0.10 | 2.5±0.23 | 0.02 |
| Activities of daily living | 0.35±0.07 | 0.16±0.03 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.01±0.06 | <0.001 |
| Mini Mental Status Examination | 23.9±0.40 | 25.5±0.18 | 25.9±0.17 | 26.2±0.37 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±SE for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables, unless otherwise stated.
HGS, handgrip strength; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression.
From analysis of covariance.
Depression were assessed using the 10-item short-form CES-D.
Characteristics of female participants according to HGS trajectory
| Characteristic | Low HGS | Mid HGS | High HGS | P-value[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participants | 439 | 1,047 | 266 | |
| Age (y) | 74.7±0.25 | 71.8±0.15 | 69.8±0.31 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.7±0.16 | 23.1±0.10 | 23.7±0.19 | <0.001 |
| Chronic disease | ||||
| Hypertension | 202 (46.0) | 446 (42.6) | 107 (40.2) | 0.89 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 83 (18.9) | 168 (16.0) | 31 (11.7) | 0.08 |
| Chronic lung disease | 11 (2.5) | 25 (2.4) | 6 (2.3) | 0.36 |
| Chronic liver disease | 5 (1.1) | 11 (1.1) | 1 (0.4) | 0.35 |
| Heart disease | 49 (11.2) | 83 (7.9) | 10 (3.8) | 0.02 |
| Stroke | 10 (2.3) | 25 (2.4) | 4 (1.5) | 0.69 |
| Education | 0.39 | |||
| Elementary school or lower | 401 (91.3) | 890 (85.0) | 214 (80.5) | |
| Middle school | 24 (5.5) | 85 (8.1) | 20 (7.5) | |
| High school | 13 (3.0) | 63 (6.0) | 22 (8.3) | |
| University or higher | 1 (0.2) | 9 (0.9) | 9 (3.4) | |
| Marital status | 0.42 | |||
| Living with spouse | 151 (34.4) | 527 (50.3) | 158 (59.4) | |
| Not living with spouse | 288 (65.6) | 520 (49.7) | 108 (40.6) | |
| Self-rated health | <0.001 | |||
| Good | 47 (10.7) | 169 (16.1) | 66 (24.8) | |
| Moderate | 93 (21.2) | 358 (34.2) | 112 (42.1) | |
| Bad | 299 (68.1) | 520 (49.7) | 88 (33.1) | |
| Smoking status | 0.69 | |||
| Non-smoker | 418 (95.2) | 1000 (95.5) | 255 (95.9) | |
| Ex-smoker | 6 (1.4) | 8 (0.8) | 3 (1.1) | |
| Current smoker | 15 (3.4) | 39 (3.7) | 8 (3.0) | |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.53 | |||
| No | 397 (90.4) | 910 (86.9) | 234 (88.0) | |
| Yes | 42 (9.6) | 137 (13.1) | 32 (12.0) | |
| Regular exercise | 0.28 | |||
| Yes | 79 (18.0) | 298 (28.5) | 95 (35.7) | |
| No | 360 (82.0) | 749 (71.5) | 171 (64.3) | |
| Depression, CES-D[ | 4.3±0.14 | 3.8±0.08 | 3.8±0.17 | 0.02 |
| Activities of daily living | 0.10±0.03 | 0.10±0.02 | 0.17±0.04 | 0.31 |
| Mini Mental Status Examination | 20.1±0.27 | 22.6±0.16 | 23.0±0.32 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±SE for continuous variables and number (%) for categorical variables, unless otherwise stated.
HGS, handgrip strength; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression.
From analysis of covariance.
Depression were assessed using the 10-item short-form CES-D.
Figure. 1.Handgrip strength (HGS) trajectories of the participants during the study period for men (A) and for women (B). In the high HGS group among males, HGS was maintained during the study period while it decreased gradually in the low HGS group (P<0.001).
Cox proportional hazard ratios of all-cause mortality according to HGS trajectories in men
| Variable | Crude | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low HGS | 10.9 (6.74–17.6) | 4.01 (2.34–6.88) | 3.46 (2.17–6.69) |
| Lower mid HGS | 4.52 (3.08–6.64) | 2.29 (1.51–3.48) | 2.26 (1.47–3.48) |
| Upper mid HGS | 2.20 (1.52–3.20) | 1.58 (1.07–2.31) | 1.58 (1.07–2.32) |
| High HGS (reference) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Age | 1.08 (1.06–1.10) | 1.08 (1.06–1.10) | |
| BMI | 0.94 (0.90–0.98) | 0.95 (0.91–0.99) | |
| HTN | 0.97 (0.92–1.03) | 0.96 (0.90–1.01) | |
| DM | 0.88 (0.82–0.94) | 0.87 (0.81–0.94) | |
| Chronic lung disease | 0.89 (0.80–0.99) | 0.89 (0.80–0.99) | |
| Smoking status | 1.54 (1.18–2.00) | ||
| Alcohol consumption | 1.00 (0.72–1.38) | ||
| MMSE | 0.99 (0.97–1.02) |
Values are presented as hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). Analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, HTN, DM, chronic lung disease, chronic liver disease, heart disease, stroke, and self-rated health; model 2: adjusted for factors in model 1+education, marital status, smoking, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, MMSE, and depression.
HGS, handgrip strength; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; MMSE, Mini Mental Status Examination.
Cox proportional hazards ratios of all-cause mortality according to HGS trajectories in women
| Variable | Crude | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low HGS | 6.61 (3.87–11.30) | 2.27 (1.25–4.11) | 2.69 (1.39–5.21) |
| Mid HGS | 2.68 (1.57–4.56) | 1.63 (0.93–2.85) | 1.97 (1.05–3.69) |
| High HGS (reference) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Age | 1.13 (1.11–1.15) | 1.12 (1.10–1.15) | |
| BMI | 0.93 (0.89–0.97) | 0.93 (0.89–0.97) | |
| HTN | 0.74 (0.57–1.13) | 0.77 (0.58–1.02) | |
| DM | 1.70 (1.24–2.33) | 1.72 (1.24–2.39) | |
| Chronic lung disease | 1.08 (0.52–2.24) | 1.00 (0.47–2.12) | |
| Smoking status | 1.61 (0.92–2.81) | ||
| Alcohol consumption | 1.55 (0.78–1.50) | ||
| MMSE | 0.98 (0.96–1.01) |
Values are presented as hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). Analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, HTN, DM, chronic lung disease, chronic liver disease, heart disease, stroke, and self-rated health; model 2: adjusted for the factors in model 1+education, marital status, smoking status, alcohol consumption, regular exercise, MMSE, and depression.
HGS, handgrip strength; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; MMSE, mini mental status examination.
Figure. 2.Kaplan-Meier survival curves stratified by Handgrip strength (HGS) for men (A) and for women (B). Among both men and women, the overall survival probability was better in the groups with strong HGS (P<0.001).