| Literature DB >> 30018407 |
Miyuki Nakamura1, Masaaki Inaba2, Shinsuke Yamada1, Etsuko Ozaki3, Saori Maruo1, Senji Okuno4, Yasuo Imanishi1, Nagato Kuriyama3, Yoshiyuki Watanabe3, Masanori Emoto1, Koka Motoyama1.
Abstract
LD-100, a quantitative ultrasonic device, allows us to measure cortical thickness (CoTh). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) show high prevalence of sarcopenia. This study aimed to clarify the association of handgrip strength (HGS) with cortical porosis, a major risk for fracture of DM. CoTh and trabecular bone mineral density (TrBMD) at the 5.5% distal radius were assessed in T2DM female patients (n = 122) and non-DM female controls (n = 704) by LD-100. T2DM patients aged older 40 years showed significantly lower HGS and CoTh, but not TrBMD, than non-DM counterparts. Although HGS was significantly and positively correlated with CoTh and TrBMD in T2DM patients, multivariate analysis revealed HGS as an independent factor positively associated with CoTh, but not TrBMD, in T2DM patients, suggesting the preferential association of HGS with cortical, but not trabecular, bone component in T2DM female patients. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated an early decline of HGS in T2DM female patients as compared with non-DM healthy controls after the age of 40 years, which is independently associated with thinner CoTh, but not TrBMD in T2DM patients, and thus suggested that reduced muscle strength associated with DM might be a major factor for cortical porosis development in DM patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018407 PMCID: PMC6050319 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29061-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical and biochemical profiles of female T2DM patients and non-DM normal subjects.
| DM patients (n = 122) | Non-DM control (n = 704) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62.3 ± 13.2 | 53.2 ± 10.0 | <0.001 |
| DM duration (years) | 11.5 (5.0–20.0) | — | — |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.9 ± 6.0 | 21.5 ± 3.1 | <0.001 |
| Hand grip strength (kg) | 17.0 ± 5.7 | 25.1 ± 5.4 | <0.001 |
| Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.68 (0.55–0.83) | 0.61 (0.55–0.67) | <0.001 |
| Serum Albumin (g/dL) | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 64.7 (53.4–86.2) | 79.3 (69.5–89.0) | <0.001 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | 123 ± 33 | — | — |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.4 ± 1.6 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | <0.001 |
| Serum Calcium (mg/dL) | 9.3 (9.0–9.6) | — | — |
| Serum Phospohorus (mg/dL) | 3.9 (3.7–4.2) | — | — |
| LD-100, 5.5% distal radius | |||
| Trabecular BMD (Z-score) | 0.14 (−0.58–0.80) | −0.23 (−0.82-0.35) | <0.001 |
| Cortical thickness (Z-score) | −0.48 (−1.38 – 0.38) | −0.07 (−0.47–0.74) | <0.001 |
Data are expressed the mean ± SD or median (inter quartile range: IQR).
Difference between DM patients and non-DM control was examined by Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 1Age-stratified HGS (kg) (a) and LD-100-determined bone parameters CoTh (mm) (b) and TrBMD (mg/cm3) (c) at 5.5% distal radius in DM female patients (n = 122) and non-DM female controls (n = 704). HGS and cortical thickness were significantly lower in T2DM patients aged 40 years and older than in age-matched non-DM subjects, in contrast with no significant reduction in Tr.BMD in T2DM patients.
Figure 2Correlation of HGS with CoTh (mm) and TrBMD (mg/cm3) at 5.5% distal radius in T2DM female patients (n = 122) and non-DM female controls (n = 704). HGS was significantly and positively correlated with CoTh (a: r = 0.354, p < 0.001) and TrBMD (b: r = 0.344, p < 0.001) in the T2DM female patients. HGS also showed a significant correlation with CoTh (c: r = 0.360, p < 0.001) and TrBMD (d: r = 0.270, p < 0.001).
Multiple regression analysis to elucidate clinical variables associated with cortical thickness (Z-score) and trabecular BMD (Z score) in type 2 DM patients (n = 122).
| LD-100-determined CoTh (Z-score) | LD-100-determined TrBMD (Z-score) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | p | β | p | |
| BMI | −0.448 | <0.001 | 0.217 | 0.025 |
| Hand grip strength | 0.319 | 0.001 | 0.125 | 0.223 |
| eGFR | −0.191 | 0.051 | −0.156 | 0.148 |
| Albumin | 0.163 | 0.075 | 0.061 | 0.543 |
| HbA1c | 0.097 | 0.286 | −0.114 | 0.254 |
| R2 (p value) | 0.269 (<0.001) | 0.111 (0.031) | ||
Shown are standard regression coefficient values (β values) and level of significance.
R2: coefficient of determination.