| Literature DB >> 32455829 |
Ekaterina Blinova1, Dmitry Enikeev1, Dmitry Roshchin2, Elena Samyshina3, Olga Deryabina4, Aleksander Tertychnyy1, Dmitry Blinov3, Evgenia Kogan1, Marina Dudina1, Haydar Barakat5, Dmitrij Merinov2, Aleksandr Kachmazov2, Stanislav Serebrianyi2, Natalia Potoldykova1, Dmitrij Perepechin2.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to assess how PD-L1 expression in tissue specimens of patients with main molecular subtypes of NMIBC (luminal, basal and double-negative p53-mutant) associates with relapsed-free survival in dependence on the tumor grade and prior treatment of primary bladder cancer. PD-L1 expressions on the membrane of neoplastic and CD8+ immune cells were assessed in tumor specimens (n = 240) of primary and relapsed luminal, basal and double-negative p53-mutant NMIBC. Association between relapse-free survival and PD-L1 expression was estimated for high- and low-grade relapsed NMIBC according to previous treatment and their molecular profile, using the Kaplan-Meier method, and assessed by using the log-rank test. Potential confounders were adjusted by Cox regression models. In a group of patients who underwent only TUR without intravesical therapy, there were significant differences in relapse time between high- and low-grade tumors in basal and luminal molecular subtypes; for basal relapsed carcinoma, RFS was shorter in cases where tumors were less malignant. Both intravesical mitomycin and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy significantly extended the time of recurrence of low-grade luminal and basal bladder malignancies with no intergroup differences in double-negative NMIBC. PD-L1 expression status was associated with RFS for luminal relapsed NMIBCs in the group without previous frontline intervention, and with RFS in the group of patients with luminal relapsed bladder cancer previously utilized BCG. Obtained results may be considered as a promising approach for further clinical implementation.Entities:
Keywords: PD-L1 expression; immune cells; malignant cells; molecular subtype; non-muscular invasive bladder cancer; relapse; survival; tumor grade
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455829 PMCID: PMC7281187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Figure A1Histological and immunohistochemical characteristic of the study groups: (1) primary NMIBC; (2) first untreated relapse of bladder cancer; (3) first relapse of NMIBC after prior intravesical mitomycin treatment; (4) first relapse of NMIBC treated with intravesical BCG. (A) Hematoxylin-eosin staining specimens, ×500. (B) IHC-staining with anti-GATA3 antibody, ×500. (C) IHC-staining with anti-KRT5/6 antibody, ×500. (D) IHC-staining with anti-p53 antibody, ×500.
Figure 1PD-L1 expression in primary and recurrent NMIBC. Boxplots show Medians of percentage of anti-PD-L1 positively stained cells in high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) primary (1), relapsed untreated (2), relapsed mitomycin-treated (3) and Bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG)-utilized (4) tumor specimens of luminal molecular subtype of bladder cancer (A); basal subtype of urothelial carcinoma (B) and double-negative (Do.Ne.) p53-expressing NMIBC (C): *—p < 0.05, intergroup comparison between HG and LG tumors of the same molecular subtype, independent t-test. Microphotographs of anti-PD-L1-stained tumor sections, IHC, ×500.
Figure 2Tumor-associated immune CD8+ cells infiltration in primary and relapsed NMIBCs. Boxplots summarized primary data and Medians of CD8+ expression in high-grade (HG) and low-grade (LG) luminal (A), basal (B) and double-negative (Do.Ne.) p53-expressing (C) primary (1), relapsed untreated tumors (2) and recurrent urothelial cancers of patients utilized intravesical mitomycin (3) and BCG (4): *—p < 0.05, intergroup comparison between HG and LG tumors of the same molecular subtype, independent t-test. Microphotographs display brown-colored nuclei of anti-CD8+ IHC-stained immune cells, ×500.
Figure 3High and Low PD-L1 status of primary and relapsed NMIBC.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier actuarial analysis of relapse-free survival time in groups of patients with High- and Low-grade of luminal, basal and double-negative p53-expressing molecular subtypes of NMIBC. Plots depict cumulative survival (Cum Survival) separately for each grade and molecular subtype of the tumor, in association with previously utilized frontline treatment.
Univariate Cox regression analysis of association between PD-L1 expression status (High vs. Low) and relapse-free survival.
| Relapse | Subgroups | HR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Luminal NMIBC | 0.29 | 0.10–0.83 | 0.022 |
| Basal NMIBC | 3.59 | 0.98–13.14 | 0.053 | |
| Double-negative NMIBC | - | - | - | |
|
| Luminal NMIBC | - | - | - |
| Basal NMIBC | - | - | - | |
| Double-negative NMIBC | - | - | - | |
|
| Luminal NMIBC | 0.04 | 0.006–0.37 | 0.004 |
| Basal NMIBC | - | - | - | |
| Double-negative NMIBC | 1.44 | 0.49–4.17 | 0.50 |
Figure A2Study design.
Disease-specific characteristics of patients, according to their distribution to the study groups.
| Study Group | Tumor Stage, Grade, n | Gender (n) | Age, Mean ± SD | Tumor Histology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary tumors, | ||||
| Luminal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (3), F (5) | 54.2 ± 4.1 | Urothelial papillary carcinoma, micropapillary carcinoma |
| T1, LG, | M (8), F (4) | 57.6 ± 3.8 | ||
| Basal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (3), F (3) | 61.4 ± 5.3 | |
| T1, LG, | M (9), F (5) | 60.2 ± 4.4 | ||
| Double-negative | CIS, HG, | M (0), F (1) | 72 | |
| T1, HG, | M (4), F (3) | 58.3 ± 2.9 | ||
| T1, LG, | M (7), F (5) | 55.9 ± 3.7 | ||
| Total | LG (41), HG (19) | M (34), F (26) | Average 57.7 ± 3.6 | |
| Immunotherapy/chemotherapy-naive relapsed tumors, | ||||
| Luminal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (6), F (3) | 63.7 ± 4.1 | Urothelial papillary carcinoma |
| T1, LG, | M (8), F (3) | 58.7 ± 4.6 | ||
| Basal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (4), F (3) | 64.3 ± 3.3 | |
| T1, LG, | M (8), F (5) | 51.5 ± 4.5 | ||
| Double-negative | T1, HG, | M (3), F (2) | 53.1 ± 5.4 | |
| T1, LG, | M (7), F (8) | 54.6 ± 2.8 | ||
| Total | LG (39), HG (21) | M (36), F (24) | Average 55.4 ± 3.8 | |
| First relapse after prior intravesical Mitomycin treatment, | ||||
| Luminal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (4), F (4) | 50.2 ± 3.2 | Urothelial papillary carcinoma |
| T1, LG, | M (7), F (5) | 54.2 ± 2.7 | ||
| Basal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (2), F (4) | 64.0 ± 3.6 | |
| T1, LG, | M (11), F (3) | 59.4 ± 3.5 | ||
| Double-negative | T1, HG, | M (3), F (6) | 55.6 ± 4.8 | |
| T1, LG, | M (5), F (6) | 54.7 ± 3.5 | ||
| Total | LG (37), HG (23) | M (32), F (28) | Average 56.4 ± 3.5 | |
| First relapse after prior intravesical BCG treatment, | ||||
| Luminal NMIBC | CIS, HG, | M (2), F (0) | 56; 67 | Urothelial papillary carcinoma, micropapillary carcinoma, squamous cancer |
| T1, HG, | M (4), F (3) | 61.1 ± 3.2 | ||
| T1, LG, | M (7), F (4) | 58.9 ± 2.6 | ||
| Basal NMIBC | T1, HG, | M (2), F (1) | 48.4 ± 4.5 | |
| T1, LG, | M (9), F (8) | 53.2 ± 2.9 | ||
| Double-negative | T1, HG, | M (3), F (1) | 55.9 ± 3.8 | |
| T1, LG, | M (9), F (7) | 57.5 ± 3.0 | ||
| Total | LG (46), HG (14) | M (36), F (24) | Average 53.8 ± 3.4 | |
M—male; F—female; LG—low grade; HG—high grade.