Literature DB >> 29750666

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Assay Concordance in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Anjelica Hodgson1,2, Elzbieta Slodkowska1,2, Achim Jungbluth3, Stanley K Liu4, Danny Vesprini5, Danny Enepekides5, Kevin Higgins5, Nora Katabi3, Bin Xu1,2, Michelle R Downes1,2.   

Abstract

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry is used to guide treatment decisions regarding the use of checkpoint immunotherapy in the management of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and hypopharyngeal (HP) squamous cell carcinoma. With increasing PD-L1 testing options, a need has arisen to assess the analytical comparability of diagnostic assays in order to develop a more sustainable testing strategy. Using tissue microarrays, PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) was manually scored in 197 cases and 27 cases of bladder and HP cancer, respectively. Three commercial kits (Ventana SP263, Ventana SP142, Dako 22C3) and 1 platform-independent test (Cell Signalling Technologies E1L3N) were utilized. Across the 3 commercially available clones, 14% and 74% of urothelial carcinomas were positive and negative, respectively, whereas 7% and 78% of HP carcinomas were positive and negative, respectively. Twelve percent of bladder and 15% HP cases showed discrepant PD-L1 classification results. Regardless of the scoring algorithm used, E1L3N provided comparable PD-L1 staining results. Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses demonstrated substantial agreement among all antibody clones (k=0.639 to 0.791) and excellent reliability among SP263, 22C3, and E1L3N antibodies (ICC, 0.929 to 0.949) in TC staining. Compared with the other 3 clones, SP142 TC staining was lower with only moderate correlation (ICC, 0.500 to 0.619). Generally, the reliability of immune cell staining was lower compared with TC staining (ICC, 0.519 to 0.866). Our results demonstrate good analytic comparability of all 4 antibodies. The results are encouraging and support growing optimism in the pathology and oncology communities concerning strategies in PD-L1 assay use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29750666      PMCID: PMC6750743          DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  29 in total

1.  Prognostic value of PD-L1 combined positive score in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Chien-Hsu Chen; Mu-Yao Tsai; Ping-Chia Chiang; Ming-Tse Sung; Hao-Lun Luo; Jau-Ling Suen; Eing-Mei Tsai; Po-Hui Chiang
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  PD-L1 Expression in Urothelial Carcinoma With Predominant or Pure Variant Histology: Concordance Among 3 Commonly Used and Commercially Available Antibodies.

Authors:  Henning Reis; Rene Serrette; Jennifer Posada; Vincent Lu; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Samson W Fine; Satish K Tickoo; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Gopa Iyer; Samuel A Funt; Min Yuen Teo; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Dean F Bajorin; Guido Dalbagni; Bernard H Bochner; David B Solit; Victor E Reuter; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Combined assessment of peritumoral Th1/Th2 polarization and peripheral immunity as a new biomarker in the prediction of BCG response in patients with high-risk NMIBC.

Authors:  Roberto Martínez; Gustavo Tapia; Silvia De Muga; Alba Hernández; Maria González Cao; Cristina Teixidó; Victor Urrea; Elisabet García; Sònia Pedreño-López; Luis Ibarz; Julià Blanco; Bonaventura Clotet; Cecilia Cabrera
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 8.110

4.  PD-L1 testing in urothelial carcinoma: are we there yet?

Authors:  Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

5.  PD-L1 expression in bladder primary in situ urothelial carcinoma: evaluation in BCG-unresponsive patients and BCG responders.

Authors:  Francesco Pierconti; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Maurizio Martini; Luigi Maria Larocca; Pier Francesco Bassi; Riccardo Bientinesi; Gianna Baroni; Andrea Minervini; Guido Petracco; Giacomo Maria Pini; Carlo Patriarca
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 6.  [Predictive diagnostics for checkpoint inhibitors].

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Wilko Weichert
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  PD-L1 testing in urothelial bladder cancer: essentials of clinical practice.

Authors:  Julien Adam; Yves Allory; Mathieu Rouanne; Camélia Radulescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Programmed cell death-ligand 1 assessment in urothelial carcinoma: prospect and limitation.

Authors:  Kyu Sang Lee; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2021-04-07

9.  Evaluation of programmed death ligand 1 expression in cytology to determine eligibility for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhonghua Liu; Michelle Williams; John Stewart; Bonnie S Glisson; Clifton Fuller; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Automated tumor proportion scoring for PD-L1 expression based on multistage ensemble strategy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Boju Pan; Yuxin Kang; Yan Jin; Lin Yang; Yushuang Zheng; Lei Cui; Jian Sun; Jun Feng; Yuan Li; Lingchuan Guo; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.