Jennifer J Ling1, Shahzad I Mian1, Joshua D Stein1,2,3, Moshiur Rahman1, Joel Poliskey4, Maria A Woodward1,2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W. K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Department of Health Management Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI; and. 4. University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of scleral contact lens (SCL) use on the risk for keratoplasty for people with keratoconus. METHODS: The electronic health records of patients receiving eye care at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center between August 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, were reviewed. Patients with a diagnostic code of keratoconus or corneal ectasia, no previous history of keratoplasty, and for whom data were available for both eyes were included. Using a multivariable Cox regression model, associations between SCL use and keratoplasty were tested and adjusted for sociodemographic factors, maximum keratometry, and current contact lens (CL) use. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred six eyes met the inclusion criteria. CL use in each eye was 36.2% with no CL, 7.2% soft, 33.9% rigid gas permeable (RGP), and 22.7% scleral. A total of 3.2% of eyes underwent keratoplasty. In the adjusted model, SCL or RGP CL use significantly lowered the hazard of undergoing keratoplasty (HR = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.39, P < 0.0001 and HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.52, P < 0.0001, respectively) when compared with no CL use. Factors associated with increased risk of keratoplasty were black race as compared to white (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.16, P = 0.02), younger age (HR = 0.92 per 5-year increment, 95% CI 0.86-0.99, P = 0.032), and lower socioeconomic status (HR = 1.08 per 5-point increase in the Area Deprivation Index, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, P = 0.0008). Keratoplasty was not associated with sex, insurance, or maximum keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should maximize the use of scleral or RGP CL because patients who successfully use CL have almost one-fifth the risk of undergoing keratoplasty.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of scleral contact lens (SCL) use on the risk for keratoplasty for people with keratoconus. METHODS: The electronic health records of patients receiving eye care at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center between August 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, were reviewed. Patients with a diagnostic code of keratoconus or corneal ectasia, no previous history of keratoplasty, and for whom data were available for both eyes were included. Using a multivariable Cox regression model, associations between SCL use and keratoplasty were tested and adjusted for sociodemographic factors, maximum keratometry, and current contact lens (CL) use. RESULTS: Two thousand eight hundred six eyes met the inclusion criteria. CL use in each eye was 36.2% with no CL, 7.2% soft, 33.9% rigid gas permeable (RGP), and 22.7% scleral. A total of 3.2% of eyes underwent keratoplasty. In the adjusted model, SCL or RGP CL use significantly lowered the hazard of undergoing keratoplasty (HR = 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.39, P < 0.0001 and HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.52, P < 0.0001, respectively) when compared with no CL use. Factors associated with increased risk of keratoplasty were black race as compared to white (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.10-3.16, P = 0.02), younger age (HR = 0.92 per 5-year increment, 95% CI 0.86-0.99, P = 0.032), and lower socioeconomic status (HR = 1.08 per 5-point increase in the Area Deprivation Index, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, P = 0.0008). Keratoplasty was not associated with sex, insurance, or maximum keratometry. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should maximize the use of scleral or RGP CL because patients who successfully use CL have almost one-fifth the risk of undergoing keratoplasty.
Authors: J H Lass; R G Lembach; S B Park; D L Hom; M E Fritz; G M Svilar; I F Nuamah; W J Reinhart; E G Stocker; R H Keates Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Carina Koppen; Elke O Kreps; Lieselotte Anthonissen; Maarten Van Hoey; Sorcha Ni Dhubhghaill; Louise Vermeulen Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Angelica C Scanzera; Marc Deeley; Charlotte Joslin; Timothy T McMahon; Ellen Shorter Journal: Eye Contact Lens Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 2.018