Literature DB >> 2183122

Clinical management of keratoconus. A multicenter analysis.

J H Lass1, R G Lembach, S B Park, D L Hom, M E Fritz, G M Svilar, I F Nuamah, W J Reinhart, E G Stocker, R H Keates.   

Abstract

The clinical management of 746 eyes in 417 patients referred for keratoconus from January 1984 through January 1988 was retrospectively analyzed. In 357 patients, 554 eyes (74%) did not require surgery and were managed with contact lenses or spectacles, 156 eyes (21%) in 137 patients either underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK) (140 eyes) or surgery was recommended (16 eyes), and 36 eyes (4%) in 34 patients underwent epikeratoplasty. Comparing baseline and final examination findings, the nonsurgical group showed a significant improvement in average best-corrected visual acuity from 20/30 to 20/25, the PK group from 20/70 to 20/25, and the epikeratoplasty group from 20/40 to 20/30. Average keratometry was unchanged in the nonsurgical group, but decreased by 10.7 diopters (D) for the PK group and 6.5 D for the epikeratoplasty group. Corneal cylinder was unchanged in the nonsurgical group, whereas there was a reduction of the percentage of eyes with indeterminant cylinder from 55 to 2% in the PK group and from 36 to 0% in the epikeratoplasty group. Previous contact lens history, best-corrected visual acuity of 20/50 or worse, and average keratometry of 55 D or greater at baseline were associated with a significant risk for PK. No baseline variables were associated with significant risk for epikeratoplasty, suggesting that this group was similar to the nonsurgical group, except for contact lens intolerance. The nonsurgical management of keratoconus continues to play a predominant role in the management of this disorder in a referral population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2183122     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32569-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  29 in total

1.  The relation between disease asymmetry and severity in keratoconus.

Authors:  J J Nichols; K Steger-May; T B Edrington; K Zadnik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Contrast and glare testing in keratoconus and after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; P Schoneveld; R J Seto; D J Coster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  A genome-wide association study identifies a potential novel gene locus for keratoconus, one of the commonest causes for corneal transplantation in developed countries.

Authors:  Xiaohui Li; Yelena Bykhovskaya; Talin Haritunians; David Siscovick; Anthony Aldave; Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Sudha K Iyengar; Jerome I Rotter; Kent D Taylor; Yaron S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Impact of Zernike-fit error on simulated high- and low-contrast acuity in keratoconus: implications for using Zernike-based corrections.

Authors:  Jason D Marsack; Konrad Pesudovs; Edwin J Sarver; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  New clinical pathways for keratoconus.

Authors:  D M Gore; A J Shortt; B D Allan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Influence of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation on corneal biomechanical parameters in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Ebru Gorgun; Raciha Beril Kucumen; Nursal Melda Yenerel
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  The lifetime economic burden of keratoconus: a decision analysis using a markov model.

Authors:  Ronald L Rebenitsch; Steven M Kymes; Jeffrey J Walline; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  A retrospective analysis of vision correction and safety in keratoconus patients wearing Toris K soft contact lenses.

Authors:  Pinar Sultan; Cezmi Dogan; Guzin Iskeleli
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 9.  Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Sabrina Mukhtar; Balamurali K Ambati
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Changes in the quality-of-life of people with keratoconus.

Authors:  Steven M Kymes; Jeffrey J Walline; Karla Zadnik; John Sterling; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.