Literature DB >> 32449884

Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After a Single Negative Screening Colonoscopy.

Nastazja Dagny Pilonis1, Marek Bugajski1, Paulina Wieszczy1, Robert Franczyk2, Joanna Didkowska3, Urszula Wojciechowska3, Malgorzata Pisera2, Maciej Rupinski1, Jaroslaw Regula1, Michal Filip Kaminski4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a 10-year interval between screening colonoscopies, but evidence is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and death from CRC after a high- and low-quality single negative screening colonoscopy.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SETTING: Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program. PARTICIPANTS: Average-risk individuals aged 50 to 66 years who had a single negative colonoscopy (no neoplastic findings). MEASUREMENTS: Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of CRC after high- and low-quality single negative screening colonoscopy. High-quality colonoscopy included a complete examination, with adequate bowel preparation, performed by endoscopists with an adenoma detection rate of 20% or greater.
RESULTS: Among 165 887 individuals followed for up to 17.4 years, CRC incidence (0.28 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.30]) and mortality (0.19 [CI, 0.16 to 0.21]) were 72% and 81% lower, respectively, than in the general population. High-quality examination resulted in 2-fold lower CRC incidence (SIR, 0.16 [CI, 0.13 to 0.20]) and mortality (SMR, 0.10 [CI, 0.06 to 0.14]) than low-quality examination (SIR, 0.32 [CI, 0.29 to 0.35]; SMR, 0.22 [CI, 0.18 to 0.25]). In multivariable analysis, the hazard ratios for CRC incidence after high-quality versus low-quality colonoscopy were 0.55 (CI, 0.35 to 0.86) for 0 to 5 years, 0.54 (CI, 0.38 to 0.77) for 5.1 to 10 years, and 0.46 (CI, 0.25 to 0.86) for 10 to 17.4 years. Only after high-quality colonoscopy did the SIR and SMR for 10.1 to 17.4 years of follow-up not differ compared with earlier observation periods. LIMITATION: The general population was used as the comparison group.
CONCLUSION: A single negative screening colonoscopy was associated with reduced CRC incidence and mortality for up to 17.4 years. Only high-quality colonoscopy yielded profound and stable reductions in CRC incidence and mortality throughout the entire follow-up. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Polish Ministry of Health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32449884     DOI: 10.7326/M19-2477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  12 in total

1.  External validation of two prediction models for adequate bowel preparation in Asia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xin Yuan; Hui Gao; Cenqin Liu; Weihong Wang; Jiarong Xie; Zhixin Zhang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Roel M M Bogie; Chantal M C le Clercq; Quirinus J M Voorham; Martijn Cordes; Daoud Sie; Christian Rausch; Evert van den Broek; Sara D J de Vries; Nicole C T van Grieken; Robert G Riedl; Prapto Sastrowijoto; Ernst-Jan Speel; Rein Vos; Bjorn Winkens; Manon van Engeland; Bauke Ylstra; Gerrit A Meijer; Ad A M Masclee; Beatriz Carvalho
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 9.075

3.  Comparison of diagnostic performance between convolutional neural networks and human endoscopists for diagnosis of colorectal polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yixin Xu; Wei Ding; Yibo Wang; Yulin Tan; Cheng Xi; Nianyuan Ye; Dapeng Wu; Xuezhong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Preparation for endoscopic examinations in patients with diabetes and hypoglycaemia.

Authors:  Konrad Lewandowski; Grażyna Rydzewska; Tomasz K Ledwoń
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-12-19

5.  Application Potential of CTHRC1 as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Indicator for Colon Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chen Pang; Hongwei Wang; Chengcheng Shen; Houjie Liang
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-01

6.  Microsimulation Model for Prevention and Intervention of Coloretal Cancer in China (MIMIC-CRC): Development, Calibration, Validation, and Application.

Authors:  Bin Lu; Le Wang; Ming Lu; Yuhan Zhang; Jie Cai; Chenyu Luo; Hongda Chen; Min Dai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Oxaliplatin induces ferroptosis and oxidative stress in HT29 colorectal cancer cells by inhibiting the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Ben Liu; Hui Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  RNA-sequencing identification and validation of genes differentially expressed in high-risk adenoma, advanced colorectal cancer, and normal controls.

Authors:  Namjoo Kim; Jeong-An Gim; Beom Jae Lee; Byung Il Choi; Seung Bin Park; Hee Sook Yoon; Sang Hee Kang; Seung Han Kim; Moon Kyung Joo; Jong-Jae Park; Chungyeul Kim; Han-Kyeom Kim
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.410

9.  Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.

Authors:  Derek W Ebner; Jason D Eckmann; Kelli N Burger; Douglas W Mahoney; Jamie Bering; Allon Kahn; Eduardo A Rodriguez; David O Prichard; Michael B Wallace; Sunanda V Kane; Lila J Finney Rutten; Suryakanth R Gurudu; John B Kisiel
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  New risk stratification after colorectal polypectomy reduces burden of surveillance without increasing mortality.

Authors:  Elisabeth Waldmann; Andreas Kammerlander; Irina Gessl; Daniela Penz; Barbara Majcher; Anna Hinterberger; Michael Trauner; Monika Ferlitsch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.