Roel M M Bogie1, Chantal M C le Clercq1, Quirinus J M Voorham2, Martijn Cordes3, Daoud Sie3, Christian Rausch2, Evert van den Broek2, Sara D J de Vries3, Nicole C T van Grieken3, Robert G Riedl4,5, Prapto Sastrowijoto5, Ernst-Jan Speel4, Rein Vos6, Bjorn Winkens6, Manon van Engeland4, Bauke Ylstra3, Gerrit A Meijer2, Ad A M Masclee7, Beatriz Carvalho2. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Department of Pathology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Pathology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 7. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. a.masclee@mumc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) pose challenges in clinical practice. PCCRCs occur due to a combination of procedural and biological causes. In a nested case-control study, we compared clinical and molecular features of PCCRCs and detected CRCs (DCRCs). METHODS: Whole-genome chromosomal copy number changes and mutation status of genes commonly affected in CRC were examined by low-coverage WGS and targeted sequencing, respectively. MSI and CIMP status was also determined. RESULTS: In total, 122 PCCRCs and 98 DCRCs with high-quality DNA were examined. PCCRCs were more often located proximally (P < 0.001), non-polypoid appearing (P = 0.004), early stage (P = 0.009) and poorly differentiated (P = 0.006). PCCRCs showed significantly less 18q loss (FDR < 0.2), compared to DCRCs. No significant differences in mutations were observed. PCCRCs were more commonly CIMP high (P = 0.014) and MSI (P = 0.029). After correction for tumour location, only less 18q loss remained significant (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Molecular features associated with the sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms (CRNs) are more commonly seen in PCCRCs than in DCRCs. These together with the clinical features observed support the hypothesis that SSLs and non-polypoid CRNs are contributors to the development of PCCRCs. The future focus should be directed at improving the detection and endoscopic removal of these non-polypoid CRN and SSLs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR3093 in the Dutch trial register ( www.trialregister.nl ).
BACKGROUND: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers (PCCRCs) pose challenges in clinical practice. PCCRCs occur due to a combination of procedural and biological causes. In a nested case-control study, we compared clinical and molecular features of PCCRCs and detected CRCs (DCRCs). METHODS: Whole-genome chromosomal copy number changes and mutation status of genes commonly affected in CRC were examined by low-coverage WGS and targeted sequencing, respectively. MSI and CIMP status was also determined. RESULTS: In total, 122 PCCRCs and 98 DCRCs with high-quality DNA were examined. PCCRCs were more often located proximally (P < 0.001), non-polypoid appearing (P = 0.004), early stage (P = 0.009) and poorly differentiated (P = 0.006). PCCRCs showed significantly less 18q loss (FDR < 0.2), compared to DCRCs. No significant differences in mutations were observed. PCCRCs were more commonly CIMP high (P = 0.014) and MSI (P = 0.029). After correction for tumour location, only less 18q loss remained significant (P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Molecular features associated with the sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and non-polypoid colorectal neoplasms (CRNs) are more commonly seen in PCCRCs than in DCRCs. These together with the clinical features observed support the hypothesis that SSLs and non-polypoid CRNs are contributors to the development of PCCRCs. The future focus should be directed at improving the detection and endoscopic removal of these non-polypoid CRN and SSLs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR3093 in the Dutch trial register ( www.trialregister.nl ).
Authors: Shin ei Kudo; René Lambert; John I Allen; Hiroaki Fujii; Takahiro Fujii; Hiroshi Kashida; Takahisa Matsuda; Masaki Mori; Hiroshi Saito; Tadakazu Shimoda; Shinji Tanaka; Hidenobu Watanabe; Joseph J Sung; Andrew D Feld; John M Inadomi; Michael J O'Brien; David A Lieberman; David F Ransohoff; Roy M Soetikno; George Triadafilopoulos; Ann Zauber; Claudio Rolim Teixeira; Jean François Rey; Edgar Jaramillo; Carlos A Rubio; Andre Van Gossum; Michael Jung; Michael Vieth; Jeremy R Jass; Paul D Hurlstone Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Yark Hazewinkel; Maria López-Cerón; James E East; Amit Rastogi; Maria Pellisé; Takeshi Nakajima; Susanne van Eeden; Kristien M A J Tytgat; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Douglas J Robertson; David A Lieberman; Sidney J Winawer; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Arthur Schatzkin; Amanda J Cross; Ann G Zauber; Timothy R Church; Peter Lance; E Robert Greenberg; María Elena Martínez Journal: Gut Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Chantal M C le Clercq; Mariëlle W E Bouwens; Eveline J A Rondagh; C Minke Bakker; Eric T P Keulen; Rogier J de Ridder; Bjorn Winkens; Ad A M Masclee; Silvia Sanduleanu Journal: Gut Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Eveline J A Rondagh; Mariëlle W E Bouwens; Robert G Riedl; Bjorn Winkens; Rogier de Ridder; Tonya Kaltenbach; Roy M Soetikno; Ad A M Masclee; Silvia Sanduleanu Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Manon de Krijger; Beatriz Carvalho; Christian Rausch; Anne S Bolijn; Pien M Delis-van Diemen; Marianne Tijssen; Manon van Engeland; Nahid Mostafavi; Roel M M Bogie; Evelien Dekker; Ad A M Masclee; Joanne Verheij; Gerrit A Meijer; Cyriel Y Ponsioen Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 7.290