Y Wendy Huynh1, Anthony Raimondi1, Andrew Finkner1, Jordan D Kuck1, Carly Selleck1, Rick A Bevins2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0308, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 238 Burnett Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0308, USA. rbevins1@unl.edu.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Menthol is a widely used tobacco constituent that has shown to enhance nicotine's reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether injected menthol also alters nicotine's stimulus effects, we used a drug discrimination task. METHODS: A total of 57 adult Sprague-Dawley rats (28M, 29F) received 20 positive and 20 negative days (intermixed) of discrimination training. On positive days, rats received a group-specific menthol and nicotine injection (VEH + 0.1 NIC, 1 M + 0.1 NIC, 5 M + 0.1 NIC, VEH + 0.4 NIC, 1 M + 0.4 NIC, 5 M + 0.4 NIC; mg/kg) before eight 15-s cue light presentations (conditioned stimulus (CS)), each followed by 4-s sucrose access. On negative days, all rats were injected with vehicle and saline before eight non-reinforced CS presentations. Next, rats underwent generalization testing with 30 dose combinations of menthol and nicotine. The change in drug-mediated anticipatory goal tracking during the CS was calculated as a difference score (CS minus pre-CS responding). RESULTS: All groups readily acquired drug discrimination. However, difference scores for the 5M + 0.1 NIC group were lower for females. Additionally, females had lower scores for 0.05, 0.1, and 0.4 mg/kg nicotine generalization tests. The lowest nicotine dose discriminable from saline was 0.05 mg/kg for females but 0.025 mg/kg for males. Co-administration with 5 or 10 mg/kg menthol weakened discrimination performance between 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg and between 0.1 and 0.05 mg/kg nicotine for 0.1 mg/kg nicotine training groups. CONCLUSIONS: Female rats that were trained with 0.1 mg/kg nicotine were more sensitive to menthol's modulatory effects on nicotine's stimulus effects. This highlights the importance of taking sex and training dose into account when evaluating the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and menthol.
RATIONALE: Menthol is a widely used tobacco constituent that has shown to enhance nicotine's reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether injected menthol also alters nicotine's stimulus effects, we used a drug discrimination task. METHODS: A total of 57 adult Sprague-Dawley rats (28M, 29F) received 20 positive and 20 negative days (intermixed) of discrimination training. On positive days, rats received a group-specific menthol and nicotine injection (VEH + 0.1 NIC, 1 M + 0.1 NIC, 5 M + 0.1 NIC, VEH + 0.4 NIC, 1 M + 0.4 NIC, 5 M + 0.4 NIC; mg/kg) before eight 15-s cue light presentations (conditioned stimulus (CS)), each followed by 4-s sucrose access. On negative days, all rats were injected with vehicle and saline before eight non-reinforced CS presentations. Next, rats underwent generalization testing with 30 dose combinations of menthol and nicotine. The change in drug-mediated anticipatory goal tracking during the CS was calculated as a difference score (CS minus pre-CS responding). RESULTS: All groups readily acquired drug discrimination. However, difference scores for the 5M + 0.1 NIC group were lower for females. Additionally, females had lower scores for 0.05, 0.1, and 0.4 mg/kg nicotine generalization tests. The lowest nicotine dose discriminable from saline was 0.05 mg/kg for females but 0.025 mg/kg for males. Co-administration with 5 or 10 mg/kg menthol weakened discrimination performance between 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg and between 0.1 and 0.05 mg/kg nicotine for 0.1 mg/kg nicotine training groups. CONCLUSIONS: Female rats that were trained with 0.1 mg/kg nicotine were more sensitive to menthol's modulatory effects on nicotine's stimulus effects. This highlights the importance of taking sex and training dose into account when evaluating the interoceptive stimulus effects of nicotine and menthol.
Entities:
Keywords:
Drug discrimination; Menthol; Nicotine; Occasion setter; Rats; Reinforcement learning; Sex differences; Tobacco
Authors: Gary A Giovino; Andrea C Villanti; Paul D Mowery; Varadan Sevilimedu; Raymond S Niaura; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams Journal: Tob Control Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Robert J Wickham; Eric J Nunes; Shannon Hughley; Phillip Silva; Sofia N Walton; Jinwoo Park; Nii A Addy Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Matthew F Thompson; Guillaume L Poirier; Martha I Dávila-García; Wei Huang; Kelly Tam; Maxwell Robidoux; Michelle L Dubuke; Scott A Shaffer; Luis Colon-Perez; Marcelo Febo; Joseph R DiFranza; Jean A King Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Jiu Ai; Kenneth M Taylor; Joseph G Lisko; Hang Tran; Clifford H Watson; Matthew R Holman Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-08-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea E Moran; Y Wendy Huynh; Andrew P Finkner; Carly Selleck; Aelyn Thompson; Scott T Barrett; Rick A Bevins Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Brady M Thompson; Scott T Barrett; Y Wendy Huynh; David A Kwan; Jennifer E Murray; Rick A Bevins Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.533