Jiu Ai1, Kenneth M Taylor2, Joseph G Lisko3, Hang Tran3, Clifford H Watson3, Matthew R Holman1. 1. Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; 2. Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; Kenneth.taylor@fda.hhs.gov. 3. Tobacco Products Laboratory, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 2011 menthol cigarettes accounted for 32 percent of the market in the United States, but there are few literature reports that provide measured menthol data for commercial cigarettes. To assess current menthol application levels in the US cigarette market, menthol levels in cigarettes labeled or not labeled to contain menthol was determined for a variety of contemporary domestic cigarette products. METHOD: We measured the menthol content of 45 whole cigarettes using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: In 23 cigarette brands labeled as menthol products, the menthol levels of the whole cigarette ranged from 2.9 to 19.6mg/cigarette, with three products having higher levels of menthol relative to the other menthol products. The menthol levels for 22 cigarette products not labeled to contain menthol ranged from 0.002 to 0.07mg/cigarette. The type of packaging (soft vs. hard pack) for a given cigarette product does not appear to affect menthol levels based on the current limited data. CONCLUSIONS: Menthol levels in cigarette products labeled as containing menthol are approximately 50- to 5000-fold higher than those in cigarette products not labeled as containing menthol. In general, menthol content appears to occur within discrete ranges for both mentholated and nonmentholated cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that menthol may be present in non-mentholated cigarettes and adds to the understanding of how menthol may be used in cigarette products. It is the first systematic study from the same laboratory which will readily enable comparison among menthol and non-menthol cigarettes.
INTRODUCTION: In 2011 menthol cigarettes accounted for 32 percent of the market in the United States, but there are few literature reports that provide measured menthol data for commercial cigarettes. To assess current menthol application levels in the US cigarette market, menthol levels in cigarettes labeled or not labeled to contain menthol was determined for a variety of contemporary domestic cigarette products. METHOD: We measured the menthol content of 45 whole cigarettes using a validated gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: In 23 cigarette brands labeled as menthol products, the menthol levels of the whole cigarette ranged from 2.9 to 19.6mg/cigarette, with three products having higher levels of menthol relative to the other menthol products. The menthol levels for 22 cigarette products not labeled to contain menthol ranged from 0.002 to 0.07mg/cigarette. The type of packaging (soft vs. hard pack) for a given cigarette product does not appear to affect menthol levels based on the current limited data. CONCLUSIONS:Menthol levels in cigarette products labeled as containing menthol are approximately 50- to 5000-fold higher than those in cigarette products not labeled as containing menthol. In general, menthol content appears to occur within discrete ranges for both mentholated and nonmentholated cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: This study shows that menthol may be present in non-mentholated cigarettes and adds to the understanding of how menthol may be used in cigarette products. It is the first systematic study from the same laboratory which will readily enable comparison among menthol and non-menthol cigarettes.
Authors: Careen Merckel; Fritz Pragst; Astrid Ratzinger; Beat Aebi; Werner Bernhard; Frank Sporkert Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2006-03-31 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: S M Gordon; M C Brinkman; R Q Meng; G M Anderson; J C Chuang; R R Kroeger; I L Reyes; P I Clark Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Carolyn C Celebucki; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Gregory N Connolly; James F Pankow; Elsa I Chang Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Jennifer M Kreslake; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Hillel R Alpert; Howard K Koh; Gregory N Connolly Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gary A Giovino; Stephen Sidney; Joseph C Gfroerer; Patrick M O'Malley; Jane A Allen; Patricia A Richter; K Michael Cummings Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sam N Cwalina; Anuja Majmundar; Jennifer B Unger; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Y Wendy Huynh; Anthony Raimondi; Andrew Finkner; Jordan D Kuck; Carly Selleck; Rick A Bevins Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Shannon Kozlovich; Gang Chen; Christy J W Watson; William J Blot; Philip Lazarus Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2019-10-02 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Patricia Richter; Pappas R Steven; Roberto Bravo; Joseph G Lisko; Maria Damian; Nathalie Gonzalez-Jimenez; Naudia Gray; Lisa M Keong; Jacob B Kimbrell; Peter Kuklenyik; Tameka S Lawler; Grace E Lee; Magaly Mendez; Jose Perez; Shakia Smith; Hang Tran; Robert Tyx; Clifford H Watson Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2016