Gary A Giovino1, Andrea C Villanti2, Paul D Mowery3, Varadan Sevilimedu3, Raymond S Niaura2, Donna M Vallone4, David B Abrams5. 1. Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA. 2. The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Legacy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA Department of Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3. Biostatistics, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 4. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Department of Research and Evaluation, Legacy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 5. The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Legacy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA Department of Health, Behavior and Society, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time. METHODS: We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004-2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12-17 year olds (56.7%) and 18-25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 34.7%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004-2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camel menthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
INTRODUCTION: Mentholated cigarettes are at least as dangerous to an individual's health as non-mentholated varieties. The addition of menthol to cigarettes reduces perceived harshness of smoke, which can facilitate initiation. Here, we examine correlates of menthol use, national trends in smoking menthol and non-menthol cigarettes, and brand preferences over time. METHODS: We estimated menthol cigarette use during 2004-2010 using annual data on persons ≥12 years old from the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. We adjusted self-reported menthol status for selected brands that were either exclusively menthol or non-menthol, based on sales data. Data were weighted to provide national estimates. RESULTS: Among cigarette smokers, menthol cigarette use was more common among 12-17 year olds (56.7%) and 18-25 year olds (45.0%) than among older persons (range 30.5% to 34.7%). In a multivariable analysis, menthol use was associated with being younger, female and of non-Caucasian race/ethnicity. Among all adolescents, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes decreased from 2004-2010, while menthol smoking rates remained constant; among all young adults, the percentage who smoked non-menthol cigarettes also declined, while menthol smoking rates increased. The use of Camelmenthol and Marlboro menthol increased among adolescent and young adult smokers, particularly non-Hispanic Caucasians, during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Young people are heavy consumers of mentholated cigarettes. Progress in reducing youth smoking has likely been attenuated by the sale and marketing of mentholated cigarettes, including emerging varieties of established youth brands. This study should inform the Food and Drug Administration regarding the potential public health impact of a menthol ban. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Disparities; Prevention; Priority/Special Populations; Public Policy; Surveillance and Monitoring
Authors: Aashir Nasim; Mignonne C Guy; Eric K Soule; Caroline O Cobb; Melissa D Blank; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Kimberly D Miller; Jiemin Ma; Rebecca L Siegel; Stacey A Fedewa; Farhad Islami; Susan S Devesa; Michael J Thun Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jessica M Rath; Andrea C Villanti; Valerie F Williams; Amanda Richardson; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna M Vallone Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Shyanika W Rose; Amanda L Johnson; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Bridget K Ambrose; Kevin Conway; K Michael Cummings; Cassandra A Stanton; Cristine Delnevo; Olivia A Wackowski; Kathryn C Edwards; Shari P Feirman; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jennifer Bernat; Enver Holder-Hayes; Victoria Green; Marushka L Silveira; Yitong Zhou; Haneen Abudayyeh; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2019-09-21 Impact factor: 7.552