| Literature DB >> 32444868 |
Amirhossein Modabbernia1, Abraham Reichenberg1,2, Alex Ing3, Dominik A Moser1,4, Gaelle E Doucet1, Eric Artiges5,6, Tobias Banaschewski7, Gareth J Barker8, Andreas Becker9, Arun L W Bokde10, Erin Burke Quinlan11, Sylvane Desrivières11, Herta Flor12,13, Juliane H Fröhner14, Hugh Garavan15, Penny Gowland16, Antoine Grigis17, Yvonne Grimmer7, Andreas Heinz18, Corinna Insensee9, Bernd Ittermann19, Jean-Luc Martinot20, Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot21,22, Sabina Millenet7, Frauke Nees7,12, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos17, Tomáš Paus23, Jani Penttilä24, Luise Poustka25, Michael N Smolka14, Argyris Stringaris26, Betteke M van Noort27, Henrik Walter18, Robert Whelan28, Gunter Schumann11,29,30,31, Sophia Frangou32,33.
Abstract
Adolescence is a period of major brain reorganization shaped by biologically timed and by environmental factors. We sought to discover linked patterns of covariation between brain structural development and a wide array of these factors by leveraging data from the IMAGEN study, a longitudinal population-based cohort of adolescents. Brain structural measures and a comprehensive array of non-imaging features (relating to demographic, anthropometric, and psychosocial characteristics) were available on 1476 IMAGEN participants aged 14 years and from a subsample reassessed at age 19 years (n = 714). We applied sparse canonical correlation analyses (sCCA) to the cross-sectional and longitudinal data to extract modes with maximum covariation between neuroimaging and non-imaging measures. Separate sCCAs for cortical thickness, cortical surface area and subcortical volumes confirmed that each imaging phenotype was correlated with non-imaging features (sCCA r range: 0.30-0.65, all PFDR < 0.001). Total intracranial volume and global measures of cortical thickness and surface area had the highest canonical cross-loadings (|ρ| = 0.31-0.61). Age, physical growth and sex had the highest association with adolescent brain structure (|ρ| = 0.24-0.62); at baseline, further significant positive associations were noted for cognitive measures while negative associations were observed at both time points for prenatal parental smoking, life events, and negative affect and substance use in youth (|ρ| = 0.10-0.23). Sex, physical growth and age are the dominant influences on adolescent brain development. We highlight the persistent negative influences of prenatal parental smoking and youth substance use as they are modifiable and of relevance for public health initiatives.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32444868 PMCID: PMC7981783 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-0757-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Psychiatry ISSN: 1359-4184 Impact factor: 13.437