| Literature DB >> 32441705 |
Camilla Weum Stjern1, Bjørn Hallvard Samset1, Gunnar Myhre1, Piers M Forster2, Øivind Hodnebrog1, Timothy Andrews3, Olivier Boucher4, Gregory Faluvegi5,6, Trond Iversen7, Matthew Kasoar8, Viatcheslav Kharin9, Alf Kirkevåg7, Jean-François Lamarque10, Dirk Olivié7, Thomas Richardson2, Dilshad Shawki8, Drew Shindell11, Christopher J Smith2, Toshihiko Takemura12, Apostolos Voulgarakis8.
Abstract
We investigate the climate response to increased concentrations of black carbon (BC), as part of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP). A tenfold increase in BC is simulated by 9 global coupled-climate models, producing a model-median effective radiative forcing (ERF) of 0.82 (ranging from 0.41 to 2.91) Wm-2, and a warming of 0.67 (0.16 to 1.66) K globally and 1.24 (0.26 to 4.31) K in the Arctic. A strong positive instantaneous radiative forcing (median of 2.10 Wm-2 based on five of the models) is countered by negative rapid adjustments (-0.64 Wm-2 for the same five models), which dampen the total surface temperature signal. Unlike other drivers of climate change, the response of temperature and cloud profiles to the BC forcing is dominated by rapid adjustments. Low-level cloud amounts increase for all models, while higher-level clouds are diminished. The rapid temperature response is particularly strong above 400 hPa, where increased atmospheric stabilization and reduced cloud cover contrast the response pattern of the other drivers. In conclusion, we find that this substantial increase in BC concentrations does have considerable impacts on important aspects of the climate system. However, some of these effects tend to offset one another, leaving a relatively small global warming of 0.47 K per Wm-2 - about 20 % lower than the response to a doubling of CO2. Translating the tenfold increase in BC to the present-day impact of anthropogenic BC (given the emissions used in this work) would leave a warming of merely 0.07 K.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 32441705 PMCID: PMC7241673 DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Geophys Res Atmos ISSN: 2169-897X Impact factor: 4.261