Literature DB >> 32704205

A PDRMIP multi-model study on the impacts of regional aerosol forcings on global and regional precipitation.

L Liu1, D Shawki2, A Voulgarakis2, M Kasoar2, B H Samset3, G Myhre3, P M Forster4, Ø Hodnebrog3, J Sillmann3, S G Aalbergsjø3, O Boucher5, G Faluvegi6, T Iversen7, A Kirkevåg7, J-F Lamarque8, D Olivié9, T Richardson10, D Shindell11, T Takemura12.   

Abstract

Atmospheric aerosols such as sulfate and black carbon (BC) generate inhomogeneous radiative forcing and can affect precipitation in distinct ways compared to greenhouse gases (GHGs). Their regional effects on the atmospheric energy budget and circulation can be important for understanding and predicting global and regional precipitation changes, which act on top of the background GHG-induced hydrological changes. Under the framework of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Inter-comparison Project (PDRMIP), multiple models were used for the first time to simulate the influence of regional (Asian and European) sulfate and BC forcing on global and regional precipitation. The results show that, as in the case of global aerosol forcing, the global fast precipitation response to regional aerosol forcing scales with global atmospheric absorption, and the slow precipitation response scales with global surface temperature response. Asian sulphate aerosols appear to be a stronger driver of global temperature and precipitation change compared to European aerosols, but when the responses are normalised by unit radiative forcing or by aerosol burden change, the picture reverses, with European aerosols being more efficient in driving global change. The global apparent hydrological sensitivities of these regional forcing experiments are again consistent with those for corresponding global aerosol forcings found in the literature. However, the regional responses and regional apparent hydrological sensitivities do not align with the corresponding global values. Through a holistic approach involving analysis of the energy budget combined with exploring changes in atmospheric dynamics, we provide a framework for explaining the global and regional precipitation responses to regional aerosol forcing.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 32704205      PMCID: PMC7376680          DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0439.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clim        ISSN: 0894-8755            Impact factor:   5.148


  9 in total

1.  Aerosol indirect effect on biogeochemical cycles and climate.

Authors:  Natalie Mahowald
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Anthropogenic aerosols and the weakening of the South Asian summer monsoon.

Authors:  Massimo A Bollasina; Yi Ming; V Ramaswamy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing.

Authors:  K S Carslaw; L A Lee; C L Reddington; K J Pringle; A Rap; P M Forster; G W Mann; D V Spracklen; M T Woodhouse; L A Regayre; J R Pierce
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Flood or drought: how do aerosols affect precipitation?

Authors:  Daniel Rosenfeld; Ulrike Lohmann; Graciela B Raga; Colin D O'Dowd; Markku Kulmala; Sandro Fuzzi; Anni Reissell; Meinrat O Andreae
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Atmospheric science. Climate effects of aerosol-cloud interactions.

Authors:  Daniel Rosenfeld; Steven Sherwood; Robert Wood; Leo Donner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  How shorter black carbon lifetime alters its climate effect.

Authors:  Øivind Hodnebrog; Gunnar Myhre; Bjørn H Samset
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Rapid adjustments cause weak surface temperature response to increased black carbon concentrations.

Authors:  Camilla Weum Stjern; Bjørn Hallvard Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; Gregory Faluvegi; Trond Iversen; Matthew Kasoar; Viatcheslav Kharin; Alf Kirkevåg; Jean-François Lamarque; Dirk Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Dilshad Shawki; Drew Shindell; Christopher J Smith; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.261

8.  Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle.

Authors:  V Ramanathan; P J Crutzen; J T Kiehl; D Rosenfeld
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Local biomass burning is a dominant cause of the observed precipitation reduction in southern Africa.

Authors:  Øivind Hodnebrog; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M Forster; Jana Sillmann; Bjørn H Samset
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Insights Into Persistent HIV-1 Infection and Functional Cure: Novel Capabilities and Strategies.

Authors:  Tram M Ta; Sajjaf Malik; Elizabeth M Anderson; Amber D Jones; Jocelyn Perchik; Maryann Freylikh; Luca Sardo; Zackary A Klase; Taisuke Izumi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Scientific data from precipitation driver response model intercomparison project.

Authors:  Gunnar Myhre; Bjørn Samset; Piers M Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Marit Sandstad; Christian W Mohr; Jana Sillmann; Camilla W Stjern; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; Gregory Faluvegi; Trond Iversen; Jean-Francois Lamarque; Matthew Kasoar; Alf Kirkevåg; Ryan Kramer; Longbo Liu; Johannes Mülmenstädt; Dirk Olivié; Johannes Quaas; Thomas B Richardson; Dilshad Shawki; Drew Shindell; Chris Smith; Philip Stier; Tao Tang; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis; Duncan Watson-Parris
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.444

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.