Literature DB >> 26287791

Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy.

.   

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal screening that uses cell-free DNA from the plasma of pregnant women offers tremendous potential as a screening method for fetal aneuploidy. A number of laboratories have validated different techniques for the use of cell-free DNA as a screening test for fetal aneuploidy. All tests have a high sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 18 and trisomy 21, regardless of which molecular technique is used. Women whose results are not reported, indeterminate, or uninterpretable (a "no call" test result) from cell-free DNA screening should receive further genetic counseling and be offered comprehensive ultrasound evaluation and diagnostic testing because of an increased risk of aneuploidy. Patients should be counseled that cell-free DNA screening does not replace the precision obtained with diagnostic tests, such as chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis and, therefore, is limited in its ability to identify all chromosome abnormalities. Cell-free DNA screening does not assess risk of fetal anomalies such as neural tube defects or ventral wall defects. Patients who are undergoing cell-free DNA screening should be offered maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening or ultrasound evaluation for risk assessment. The cell-free DNA screening test should not be considered in isolation from other clinical findings and test results. Management decisions, including termination of the pregnancy, should not be based on the results of the cell-free DNA screening alone. Patients should be counseled that a negative cell-free DNA test result does not ensure an unaffected pregnancy. Given the performance of conventional screening methods, the limitations of cell-free DNA screening performance, and the limited data on cost-effectiveness in the low-risk obstetric population, conventional screening methods remain the most appropriate choice for first-line screening for most women in the general obstetric population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26287791     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  73 in total

1.  PURLs: Aneuploidy screening: Newer noninvasive test gains traction.

Authors:  Sarah Nickolich; Narges Farahi; Kohar Jones; Anne Mounsey
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Repeated failed non-invasive prenatal testing in a woman with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid syndrome: lessons learnt.

Authors:  C Y Y Hui; W C Tan; E L Tan; L K Tan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-05

3.  Impact of the increased adoption of prenatal cfDNA screening on non-profit patient advocacy organizations in the United States.

Authors:  Stephanie Meredith; Christopher Kaposy; Victoria J Miller; Megan Allyse; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Prenatal Testing for Adult-Onset Conditions: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Laura Hercher; Wendy R Uhlmann; Erin P Hoffman; Shanna Gustafson; Kelly M Chen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Pregnancy-associated changes in cervical noncoding RNA.

Authors:  Kristin D Gerson; Miriam J Haviland; Dayna Neo; Jonathan L Hecht; Andrea A Baccarelli; Kasey Jm Brennan; Alexandra E Dereix; Steven J Ralston; Michele R Hacker; Heather H Burris
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.778

6.  A Hierarchical Bayes Approach to Modeling Heterogeneity in Discrete Choice Experiments: An Application to Public Preferences for Prenatal Screening.

Authors:  Tima Mohammadi; Wei Zhang; Julie Sou; Sylvie Langlois; Sarah Munro; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 7.  Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kathryn J Gray; Louise E Wilkins-Haug
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-03-17

8.  Talking Points: Women's Information Needs for Informed Decision-Making About Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Aimée C Dane; Madelyn Peterson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Cell-Free DNA Screening: Complexities and Challenges of Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Matthew R Grace; Emily Hardisty; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; Neeta L Vora; Jeffrey A Kuller
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.347

10.  Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women's Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections.

Authors:  Erin Floyd; Megan A Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.