Literature DB >> 32437287

The Sweetened Beverage Tax in Cook County, Illinois: Lessons From a Failed Effort.

Jamie F Chriqui1, Christina N Sansone1, Lisa M Powell1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To describe the public health and policy lessons learned from the failure of the Cook County, Illinois, Sweetened Beverage Tax (SBT).Methods. This retrospective, mixed-methods, qualitative study involved key informant (KI) and discussion group interviews and document analysis including news media, court documents, testimony, letters, and press releases. Two coders used Atlas.ti v.8A to analyze 321 documents (from September 2016 through December 2017) and 6 KI and discussion group transcripts (from December 2017 through August 2018).Results. Key lessons were (1) the SBT process needed to be treated as a political campaign, (2) there was inconsistent messaging regarding the tax purpose (i.e., revenue vs public health), (3) it was important to understand the local context and constraints, (4) there was implementation confusion, and (5) the media influenced an antitax backlash.Conclusions. The experience with the implementation and repeal of the Cook County SBT provides important lessons for future beverage tax efforts.Public Health Implications. Beverage taxation efforts need to be treated as political campaigns requiring strong coalitions, clear messaging, substantial resources, and work within the local context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32437287      PMCID: PMC7287549          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   11.561


  23 in total

1.  News coverage of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: pro- and antitax arguments in public discourse.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Sarah E Gollust; Marian P Jarlenski; Ashley M Nathanson; Colleen L Barry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Exploring perceptions of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax among adolescents in north-west Mexico: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ana G Ortega-Avila; Angeliki Papadaki; Russell Jago
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.

Authors:  M Arantxa Colchero; Juan Rivera-Dommarco; Barry M Popkin; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process: Implications for Policy Development and Advocacy.

Authors:  Jonathan Purtle; Brent Langellier; Félice Lê-Scherban
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb

5.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption 3 Years After the Berkeley, California, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.

Authors:  Matthew M Lee; Jennifer Falbe; Dean Schillinger; Sanjay Basu; Charles E McCulloch; Kristine A Madsen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.

Authors:  Lynn D Silver; Shu Wen Ng; Suzanne Ryan-Ibarra; Lindsey Smith Taillie; Marta Induni; Donna R Miles; Jennifer M Poti; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study.

Authors:  M Arantxa Colchero; Barry M Popkin; Juan A Rivera; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-06

9.  Beverages Sales in Mexico before and after Implementation of a Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax.

Authors:  M A Colchero; Carlos Manuel Guerrero-López; Mariana Molina; Juan Angel Rivera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tapping the Power of Soda Taxes: A Call for Multidisciplinary Research and Broad-Based Advocacy Coalitions - A Response to the Recent Commentaries.

Authors:  Sarah A Roache; Lawrence O Gostin
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-07-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of Seattle's sweetened beverage tax on tax support and perceived economic and health impacts.

Authors:  Vanessa M Oddo; Melissa A Knox; Lina Pinero Walkinshaw; Brian E Saelens; Nadine Chan; Jessica C Jones-Smith
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Implementation Science Is Important for Understanding and Advancing Beverage Taxes.

Authors:  Sara N Bleich; Jamie Chriqui; Shu Wen Ng
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 11.561

3.  Effectiveness and Policy Determinants of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.

Authors:  L L Hagenaars; P P T Jeurissen; N S Klazinga; S Listl; M Jevdjevic
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Missed Opportunities: The Need to Promote Public Knowledge and Awareness of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.

Authors:  Emily A Altman; Kristine A Madsen; Laura A Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  How should we evaluate sweetened beverage tax policies? A review of worldwide experience.

Authors:  Shu Wen Ng; M Arantxa Colchero; Martin White
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Identifying barriers and facilitators in the development and implementation of government-led food environment policies: a systematic review.

Authors:  SeeHoe Ng; Heather Yeatman; Bridget Kelly; Sreelakshmi Sankaranarayanan; Tilakavati Karupaiah
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.846

7.  Low-income parents' perceptions of a sweetened beverage tax in Philadelphia.

Authors:  Emma K Edmondson; Judy A Shea; Emily F Gregory; Christina A Roberto; Stephanie M Garcia; Jeemin Kwon; Senbagam Virudachalam
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2022-08-22

Review 8.  Sugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review.

Authors:  Sarah Forberger; Lucia Reisch; Biljana Meshkovska; Karolina Lobczowska; Daniel Alexander Scheller; Janine Wendt; Lara Christianson; Jennifer Frense; Jürgen Michael Steinacker; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-03-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.