| Literature DB >> 32436628 |
Abstract
In the past, in vitro studies of invasion and tumor progression were performed primarily using cancer cells cultured on a flat, two-dimensional (2D) surface in a monolayer. In recent years, however, many studies have demonstrated differences in cell signaling and cell migration between 2D and 3D cell cultures. Traditional 2D monolayer cancer cell invasion models do not fully recapitulate 3D cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular matrix interactions that in vivo models can provide. Moreover, although in vivo animal models are irreplaceable for studying tumor biology and metastasis, they are costly, time-consuming, and impractical for answering preliminary questions. Thus, emergent and evolving 3D spheroid cell culture models have changed the way we study tumors and their interactions with their surrounding extracellular matrix. In the case of breast cancer, metastasis of breast cancer tumors results in high mortality rates, and thus development of robust cell culture models that are reproducible and practical for studying breast cancer progression is important for ultimately developing preventatives for cancer metastasis. This article provides a set of protocols for generating uniform spheroids with a thin sheet of basement membrane for studying the initial invasion of mammary epithelial cells into a surrounding collagen-rich extracellular matrix. Details are provided for generating 3D spheroids with a basement membrane, polymerizing collagen I, embedding the spheroids in the 3D collagen gel, and immunostaining the spheroids for invasion studies. Published 2020. U.S. Government. Basic Protocol 1: Growth of uniformly sized tumor spheroids with an encapsulating basement membrane Basic Protocol 2: Polymerization and embedding of tumor spheroids in a 3D type I collagen gel Alternate Protocol: Embedding of tumor spheroids in collagen gels using a sandwich method Basic Protocol 3: Fixing and immunostaining of tumor spheroids embedded in 3D collagen gels. Published 2020. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.Entities:
Keywords: 3D-model; basement membrane; invasion; spheroid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32436628 PMCID: PMC8172047 DOI: 10.1002/cpcb.105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Protoc Cell Biol ISSN: 1934-2616
Figure 1Schematic representation of procedures for generating uniform spheroids with intact basement membranes and embedding them in 3D collagen gels for invasion studies. (1) Seed 2000 cells per well in a low‐attachment 96 well U‐bottom plate. After centrifugation, aggregates form in the wells (A and B). (2) Adding 5% Matrigel solution results in a conversion of the aggregates into well‐formed spheroids in the wells (C and D). (3) After neutralizing the collagen gel, embed the spheroids in the collagen gels in MatTek dishes. Allow the gel to polymerize at 37°C for 30 min. (4) Add fresh medium to the dishes and allow cells to invade into the collagen‐rich ECM after 48 hr (E and F).
Troubleshooting Guide for Generating Uniform Spheroids with an Intact, Thin, Single‐Layer Basement Membrane, Embedding the Spheroids in Collagen Type I Gels, and Immunostaining
| Procedure | Problem | Possible cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform spheroid formation (Basic Protocol | Spheroids did not form (cells are still in aggregates and there is no defined edge) | Did not centrifuge the plates after seeding and/or after adding Matrigel | Centrifuge plates the day after seeding and after adding Matrigel. Note that this is also dependent on the cell type, and some cells may form spheroids that are irregular in shape |
| Polymerizing collagen and embedding spheroid with basement membrane in collagen gels (Basic Protocol | Matrigel is spread around the spheroid in an unorganized fashion | Did not wash the spheroid sufficiently with HBSS to remove excess Matrigel | Wash spheroids with HBSS and make sure you are removing more and more Matrigel/medium from the well with each wash |
| Collagen gel pops off the coverslip | There were bubbles present at the edge of the gel at the junction of the coverslip and the plastic MatTek dish | Always check under a microscope after putting the neutralized collagen solution into the MatTek dish to ensure you have spread the gel uniformly over the coverslip with no holes or bubbles present | |
| Cells die in the gel | The gel has a low pH and it was not adjusted to neutral pH | Make sure to wait 1‐2 min for the pH strip to show the correct pH and for the gel mixture to turn a peach hue | |
| Embedding the spheroids in collagen gels using the “sandwich” method ( | The cells migrate in between the two layers of gel | This can vary with different cells and their normal migration patterns in 3D. Some cells may find it easier to migrate through the two collagen layers instead of through the collagen fibers. | Follow Basic Protocol |
| Fixing and immunostaining the 3D spheroid model (Basic Protocol | There is no staining in the middle of the spheroid | The spheroid was not properly permeabilized | If permeabilized for only 2 hr, extend the permeabilization step for another 2‐4 hr |
Figure 2Spheroids with encapsulating basement membrane in 3D collagen gels. (A) MCF10A spheroids confined by a basement membrane stained with collagen IV antibody and imaged using a confocal microscope. (B) MDA‐231BO spheroid stained for collagen IV is shown as a confocal slice and a max‐projection of the collagen IV surrounding the 3D spheroid. (C) High‐resolution images of MDA‐231BO spheroids with an intact basement membrane before and after initial break through the basement membrane. (D) Six days after spheroids were incubated in 3D collagen gels, cells migrated into the 3D ECM. Note that the absence of a basement membrane or collagen IV staining is because the cells have broken out and migrated away from the initial spheroid, which is depicted by dashed lines.