Literature DB >> 32436048

Is intracytoplasmic sperm (ICSI) better than traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF): confirmation of higher blastocyst rates per oocyte using a split insemination design.

May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler1, Warren J Huber2,3, Phinnara Has4, Chloe Shen5, Richard Hackett5, Ruben Alvero6, Shunping Wang5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the effects of traditional vs. intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) insemination method on the outcome of high-quality blastocyst development in a split sibling oocyte cohort.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 62 ICSI/IVF split cycles. Sibling oocytes were randomly assigned to ICSI or IVF insemination. Two hundred thirty-four ICSI-only cycles and 152 IVF-only cycles were also analyzed for comparison. Blastocysts were graded by Gardner's embryo grading and were considered a high-quality blastocyst if 3BB or better (Gardner 1999).
RESULTS: In the ICSI/IVF split group, (1) ICSI oocytes had a higher fertilization rate per oocyte allocated (73% vs 62%, p < 0.001), (2) more high-quality day 2 embryos (69% vs 55%, p < 0.005), (3) ICSI oocytes had a lower blastulation rate per 2PN (46% vs 54%, p < 0.05), but a higher blastulation rate when calculated per oocyte allocated (40% vs 32%, p < 0.05). The ICSI-only group had a lower fertilization rate (65% vs 70%, p < 0.001) but more high-quality day 2 embryos in comparison to the IVF-only group (68% vs 64%, p < .05). The total high-quality blastulation rate was higher for the IVF-only group per 2PN (49% vs 43%, p < 0.05) and per oocyte retrieved (34% vs 28%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: This distinctive IVF/ICSI sibling oocyte split design demonstrated a higher-quality blastulation rate in the IVF group compared to the ICSI group when calculated per 2PN, but not per oocyte allocated to each insemination procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology (ART); Blastulation rate; In vitro fertilization; Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32436048      PMCID: PMC7376810          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01819-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  20 in total

Review 1.  The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects.

Authors:  Patrizia Rubino; Paola Viganò; Alice Luddi; Paola Piomboni
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Timing of oocyte activation, pronucleus formation and cleavage in humans after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with testicular spermatozoa and after ICSI or in-vitro fertilization on sibling oocytes with ejaculated spermatozoa.

Authors:  Z P Nagy; C Janssenswillen; R Janssens; A De Vos; C Staessen; H Van de Velde; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure.

Authors:  T A Griffiths; A P Murdoch; M Herbert
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure.

Authors:  Lisbet Van Landuyt; Anick De Vos; Hubert Joris; Greta Verheyen; Paul Devroey; André Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from couples with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen.

Authors:  Alisa Komsky-Elbaz; Arieh Raziel; Shevach Friedler; Deborah Strassburger; Esti Kasterstein; Daphna Komarovsky; Raphael Ron-El; Ido Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Medical outcome of 8-year-old singleton ICSI children (born >or=32 weeks' gestation) and a spontaneously conceived comparison group.

Authors:  F Belva; S Henriet; I Liebaers; A Van Steirteghem; S Celestin-Westreich; M Bonduelle
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Examination of the safety of intracytoplasmic injection procedures by using bovine zygotes.

Authors:  M Motoishi; K Goto; K Tomita; S Ookutsu; Y Nakanishi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Akanksha Mehta; Dmitry M Kissin; Lee Warner; Jennifer F Kawwass; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Comparison of embryo quality between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in sibling oocytes.

Authors:  R Yoeli; R Orvieto; J Ashkenazi; M Shelef; Z Ben-Rafael; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1,219 consecutive cycles.

Authors:  Rossella Mazzilli; Danilo Cimadomo; Alberto Vaiarelli; Antonio Capalbo; Lisa Dovere; Erminia Alviggi; Ludovica Dusi; Carlo Foresta; Francesco Lombardo; Andrea Lenzi; Herman Tournaye; Carlo Alviggi; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a prospective control trial.

Authors:  Changjian Yin; Lian-Jie Li; Shuiying Ma; Hui Zhao; Lihong Xu; Cheng Li; Haibin Zhao; Qing Li; Kai Xu; Mei Li
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Embryo blastulation and quality between days 5 and 6 of extended embryo culture.

Authors:  E B Nguyen; E A Jacobs; K M Summers; A E Sparks; B J Van Voorhis; V E Klenov; E H Duran
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Effect of early rescue ICSI and split IVF-ICSI in preventing low fertilization rate during the first ART cycle: A real-world retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Linlin Jiang; Yifan Qian; Xiaoli Chen; Xiaohui Ji; Songbang Ou; Ruiqi Li; Dongzi Yang; Yu Li
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Frozen blastocysts: Assessing the importance of day 5/day 6 blastocysts or blastocyst quality.

Authors:  Yan Jiang; Ge Song; Xu-Hui Zhang; Sui-Bing Miao; Xiao-Hua Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection May Not Improve Clinical Outcomes Despite Its Positive Effect on Embryo Results: A Retrospective Analysis of 1130 Half-ICSI Treatments.

Authors:  Nan Peng; Shuiying Ma; Cheng Li; Hui Liu; Haibin Zhao; Lian-Jie Li; Qing Li; Mei Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.055

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.