Literature DB >> 34802083

Efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a prospective control trial.

Changjian Yin1,2,3,4,5, Lian-Jie Li1,2,3,4,5, Shuiying Ma1,2,3,4,5, Hui Zhao1,2,3,4,5, Lihong Xu1,2,3,4,5,6, Cheng Li1,2,3,4,5, Haibin Zhao1,2,3,4,5, Qing Li1,2,3,4,5, Kai Xu1,2,3,4,5, Mei Li7,8,9,10,11,12,13.   

Abstract

To clarify the efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) application on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT) cycles, we designed the non-randomized concurrent control trial included 4039 VBT cycles in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, during the even days from November 2014 to December 2015. The VBT cycles were divided into LAH group (n = 1932) and non-LAH group (n = 2107) according to the date of blastocyst thawing. Laser-partial zona pellucida dissection was performed on all blastocysts thawed on that day every 4 days, and those blastocysts were assigned to the LAH group. There were a higher biochemical pregnancy rate (66.87% vs 63.69%; P = 0.034; rate ratio for LAH vs non-LAH group [RR], 1.050; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-1.098) and an increased live birth rate (48.81% vs 45.51%; P = 0.036; RR, 1.072; 95% CI, 1.005-1.145) with comparable ectopic pregnancy, twin or multiple pregnancies, spontaneous abortion and birth defect rates of the LAH group than those of the non-LAH group. Subgroup analysis showed that live birth rate, birth defect rate, and other pregnancy outcomes were comparable for patients younger than 35 years when blastocyst transfer, patients with endometrium thickness less than 0.9 cm during ovulation or the initiation of progesterone treatment, ICSI blastocysts, AC or BC blastocysts according to Gardner morphological criteria and day 5 blastocysts of the LAH group than it of non-LAH group. LAH could be performed selectively on vitrified-warmed blastocysts before transfer for better pregnancy outcomes. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000032975. Date of registration: May 17, 2020. Retrospectively registered.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth defect rate; Laser-assisted hatching; Live birth rate; Subgroup analysis; Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34802083     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03453-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  18 in total

1.  Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Cai-Yun Wan; Cheng Song; Liang-Hui Diao; Guan-Gui Li; Zhong-Jian Bao; Xiao-Dong Hu; Hong-Zhan Zhang; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  Frozen IVF Cycles to Circumvent the Hormonal Storm on Endometrium.

Authors:  Paola Viganò; Alessandra Alteri; Andrea Busnelli; Valeria Stella Vanni; Edgardo Somigliana
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 3.  Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah-Kate Carney; Sangeeta Das; Debbie Blake; Cindy Farquhar; Mourad M W Seif; Linsey Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

4.  Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women.

Authors:  Yuhua Shi; Yun Sun; Cuifang Hao; Heping Zhang; Daimin Wei; Yunshan Zhang; Yimin Zhu; Xiaohui Deng; Xiujuan Qi; Hong Li; Xiang Ma; Haiqin Ren; Yaqin Wang; Dan Zhang; Bo Wang; Fenghua Liu; Qiongfang Wu; Ze Wang; Haiyan Bai; Yuan Li; Yi Zhou; Mei Sun; Hong Liu; Jing Li; Lin Zhang; Xiaoli Chen; Songying Zhang; Xiaoxi Sun; Richard S Legro; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zi-Jiang Chen; Yuhua Shi; Yun Sun; Bo Zhang; Xiaoyan Liang; Yunxia Cao; Jing Yang; Jiayin Liu; Daimin Wei; Ning Weng; Lifeng Tian; Cuifang Hao; Dongzi Yang; Feng Zhou; Juanzi Shi; Yongle Xu; Jing Li; Junhao Yan; Yingying Qin; Han Zhao; Heping Zhang; Richard S Legro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Laser-assisted hatching of embryos is better than the chemical method for enhancing the pregnancy rate in women with advanced age.

Authors:  Yao-Yuan Hsieh; Chun-Chia Huang; Tzu-Chun Cheng; Chi-Chen Chang; Horng-Der Tsai; Maw-Sheng Lee
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Effect of laser zona pellucida opening on clinical outcome of assisted reproduction technology in patients with advanced female age, recurrent implantation failure, or frozen-thawed embryos.

Authors:  Mojtaba Rezazadeh Valojerdi; Poopak Eftekhari-Yazdi; Leila Karimian; Saeed Kazemi Ashtiani
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Laser-assisted hatching on clinical and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing single vitrified Blastocyst transfer: A propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yuji Endo; Shingo Mitsuhata; Momoko Hayashi; Yoshitaka Fujii; Hiroaki Motoyama
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-27

Review 9.  Effect of assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Da Li; Da-Lei Yang; Jing An; Jiao Jiao; Yi-Ming Zhou; Qi-Jun Wu; Xiu-Xia Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assisted hatching of vitrified-warmed blastocysts prior to embryo transfer does not improve pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Charis Ng; Marta Wais; Taryn Nichols; Sarah Garrow; Julius Hreinsson; Zhong-Cheng Luo; Crystal Chan
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.234

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Live birth from a blastocyst derived from a conjoined oocyte in a frozen embryo transfer cycle: a case report and a literature review.

Authors:  Li Fu; Shaowei Chen; Mingyong Wang; Guiying Huang; Fang Wang; Yunzhu Lan; Shuang Liu; Xia Jiang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.