Literature DB >> 32431779

High-Dimensional Confounding Adjustment Using Continuous Spike and Slab Priors.

Joseph Antonelli1, Giovanni Parmigiani2, Francesca Dominici3.   

Abstract

In observational studies, estimation of a causal effect of a treatment on an outcome relies on proper adjustment for confounding. If the number of the potential confounders (p) is larger than the number of observations (n), then direct control for all potential confounders is infeasible. Existing approaches for dimension reduction and penalization are generally aimed at predicting the outcome, and are less suited for estimation of causal effects. Under standard penalization approaches (e.g. Lasso), if a variable Xj is strongly associated with the treatment T but weakly with the outcome Y, the coefficient βj will be shrunk towards zero thus leading to confounding bias. Under the assumption of a linear model for the outcome and sparsity, we propose continuous spike and slab priors on the regression coefficients βj corresponding to the potential confounders Xj . Specifically, we introduce a prior distribution that does not heavily shrink to zero the coefficients (βj s) of the Xj s that are strongly associated with T but weakly associated with Y. We compare our proposed approach to several state of the art methods proposed in the literature. Our proposed approach has the following features: 1) it reduces confounding bias in high dimensional settings; 2) it shrinks towards zero coefficients of instrumental variables; and 3) it achieves good coverages even in small sample sizes. We apply our approach to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data to estimate the causal effects of persistent pesticide exposure on triglyceride levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bayesian variable selection; causal inference; high-dimensional data; shrinkage priors

Year:  2019        PMID: 32431779      PMCID: PMC7236769          DOI: 10.1214/18-ba1131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bayesian Anal        ISSN: 1931-6690            Impact factor:   3.728


  23 in total

Review 1.  Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

Authors:  R J Little; D B Rubin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 3.  Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Christopher Paul Wild
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  A database of human exposomes and phenomes from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Chirag J Patel; Nam Pho; Michael McDuffie; Jeremy Easton-Marks; Cartik Kothari; Isaac S Kohane; Paul Avillach
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 6.444

5.  Model averaged double robust estimation.

Authors:  Matthew Cefalu; Francesca Dominici; Nils Arvold; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.

Authors:  Susan M Shortreed; Ashkan Ertefaie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Accounting for uncertainty in confounder and effect modifier selection when estimating average causal effects in generalized linear models.

Authors:  Chi Wang; Francesca Dominici; Giovanni Parmigiani; Corwin Matthew Zigler
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  An Environment-Wide Association Study (EWAS) on type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Chirag J Patel; Jayanta Bhattacharya; Atul J Butte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Exposome: time for transformative research.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Rajeshwari Sundaram
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Studying the elusive environment in large scale.

Authors:  Chirag J Patel; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

1.  Causal inference in high dimensions: A marriage between Bayesian modeling and good frequentist properties.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Georgia Papadogeorgou; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.