| Literature DB >> 32429361 |
Viktorija Bakstytė1, Liveta Šniurevičiūtė1, Evelina Šimienė2, Justina Skruodytė2, Ingrida Janulevičienė2.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: choriocapillaris; flow deficits; ophthalmologically healthy children; optical coherence tomography angiography; retinal nerve fiber layer; swept-source optical coherence tomography
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32429361 PMCID: PMC7279138 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56050238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.430
Figure 13 × 3-mm-diameter scans used for visualization of the choriocapillaris and the areas used to calculate the percentage of flow deficits (FDs). (a) shows the 1-mm-diameter yellow circle and 2.5-mm-diameter red circle centered on the fovea that includes 3 regions: the 2.5-mm circle composed of a 1-mm circle and a 1.5-mm rim. (b) represents the choriocapillaris layer after artefact removal. (c) presents the choriocapillaris layer after binarization and thresholding. The white areas in the scan correspond to the flow deficits. (d) shows the circles used to measure the percentage of flow deficits within the regions. (a–d) Images from the same 9-year-old subject.
Figure 26 × 6-mm-diameter scans used for visualization of the choriocapillaris and the areas used to calculate the percentage of flow deficits. (a) shows the 1-mm-diameter yellow circle, 2.5-mm-diameter red circle, and 5-mm-diameter green circle centered on the fovea that includes 4 regions: the 5-mm circle composed of a 1-mm circle, a 1.5-mm inner rim, and a 2.5-mm outer rim. (b) represents the choriocapillaris layer after artefact removal. (c) presents the choriocapillaris layer after binarization and thresholding. The white areas in the scan correspond to the flow deficits. (d) shows the circles used to measure the percentage of flow deficits within the regions. (a–d) Images from the same 9-year-old subject.
Minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviations of the retinal nerve fiber layer retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL).
| RNFL | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNFL 1 | 100 | 190 | 147.89 | 21.469 |
| RNFL 2 | 63 | 166 | 89.88 | 16.991 |
| RNFL 3 | 48 | 98 | 63.95 | 8.935 |
| RNFL 4 | 51 | 128 | 76.93 | 14.693 |
| RNFL 5 | 108 | 196 | 149.23 | 19.888 |
| RNFL 6 | 82 | 204 | 146.88 | 24.644 |
| RNFL 7 | 71 | 161 | 108.35 | 19.814 |
| RNFL 8 | 45 | 121 | 80.68 | 15.197 |
| RNFL 9 | 46 | 95 | 63.78 | 10.852 |
| RNFL 10 | 69 | 145 | 100.22 | 17.084 |
| RNFL 11 | 86 | 163 | 123.66 | 18.763 |
| RNFL 12 | 65 | 183 | 121.66 | 24.826 |
| RNFL inferior | 99 | 169 | 134.85 | 15.459 |
| RNFL nasal | 54 | 115 | 81.62 | 11.932 |
| RNFL temporal | 56 | 128 | 76.95 | 11.825 |
| RNFL superior | 96 | 166 | 131.04 | 14.126 |
Distribution of RNFL quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, temporal) and twelve clock-hour (RNFL 1–12) independent sectors around the disc.
Figure 3The percentage of flow deficits in the 3 × 3-mm and 6 × 6-mm scans.
Figure 4The percentage of flow deficits in the (a) 1-mm circles, (b) 2.5-mm circles, and (c) 1.5-mm rims centered on fovea and compared between 3 × 3-mm and 6 × 6-mm scans.