Importance: Imaging of the choriocapillaris in vivo is challenging with existing technology. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), if optimized, could make the imaging less challenging. Objective: To investigate multiple en face image averaging on OCTA images of the choriocapillaris. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational, cross-sectional case series at a referral institutional practice in Los Angeles, California. From the original cohort of 21 healthy individuals, 17 normal eyes of 17 participants were included in the study. The study dates were August to September 2016. Exposures: All participants underwent OCTA imaging of the macula covering a 3 × 3-mm area using OCTA software (Cirrus 5000 with AngioPlex; Carl Zeiss Meditec). One eye per participant was repeatedly imaged to obtain 9 OCTA cube scan sets. Registration was first performed using superficial capillary plexus images, and this transformation was then applied to the choriocapillaris images. The 9 registered choriocapillaris images were then averaged. Quantitative parameters were measured on binarized OCTA images and compared with the unaveraged OCTA images. Main Outcome and Measure: Vessel caliber measurement. Results: Seventeen eyes of 17 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [6.0] years; 9 [53%] female; and 9 [53%] of white race/ethnicity) with sufficient image quality were included in this analysis. The single unaveraged images demonstrated a granular appearance, and the vascular pattern was difficult to discern. After averaging, en face choriocapillaris images showed a meshwork appearance. The mean (SD) diameter of the vessels was 22.8 (5.8) µm (range, 9.6-40.2 µm). Compared with the single unaveraged images, the averaged images showed more flow voids (1423 flow voids [95% CI, 967-1909] vs 1254 flow voids [95% CI, 825-1683], P < .001), smaller average size of the flow voids (911 [95% CI, 301-1521] µm2 vs 1364 [95% CI, 645-2083] µm2, P < .001), and greater vessel density (70.7% [95% CI, 61.9%-79.5%] vs 61.9% [95% CI, 56.0%-67.8%], P < .001). The distribution of the number vs sizes of the flow voids was skewed in both unaveraged and averaged images. A linear log-log plot of the distribution showed a more homogeneous distribution in the averaged images compared with the unaveraged images. Conclusions and Relevance: Multiple en face averaging can improve visualization of the choriocapillaris on OCTA images, transforming the images from a granular appearance to a level where the intervascular spaces can be resolved in healthy volunteers.
Importance: Imaging of the choriocapillaris in vivo is challenging with existing technology. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), if optimized, could make the imaging less challenging. Objective: To investigate multiple en face image averaging on OCTA images of the choriocapillaris. Design, Setting, and Participants: Observational, cross-sectional case series at a referral institutional practice in Los Angeles, California. From the original cohort of 21 healthy individuals, 17 normal eyes of 17 participants were included in the study. The study dates were August to September 2016. Exposures: All participants underwent OCTA imaging of the macula covering a 3 × 3-mm area using OCTA software (Cirrus 5000 with AngioPlex; Carl Zeiss Meditec). One eye per participant was repeatedly imaged to obtain 9 OCTA cube scan sets. Registration was first performed using superficial capillary plexus images, and this transformation was then applied to the choriocapillaris images. The 9 registered choriocapillaris images were then averaged. Quantitative parameters were measured on binarized OCTA images and compared with the unaveraged OCTA images. Main Outcome and Measure: Vessel caliber measurement. Results: Seventeen eyes of 17 participants (mean [SD] age, 35.1 [6.0] years; 9 [53%] female; and 9 [53%] of white race/ethnicity) with sufficient image quality were included in this analysis. The single unaveraged images demonstrated a granular appearance, and the vascular pattern was difficult to discern. After averaging, en face choriocapillaris images showed a meshwork appearance. The mean (SD) diameter of the vessels was 22.8 (5.8) µm (range, 9.6-40.2 µm). Compared with the single unaveraged images, the averaged images showed more flow voids (1423 flow voids [95% CI, 967-1909] vs 1254 flow voids [95% CI, 825-1683], P < .001), smaller average size of the flow voids (911 [95% CI, 301-1521] µm2 vs 1364 [95% CI, 645-2083] µm2, P < .001), and greater vessel density (70.7% [95% CI, 61.9%-79.5%] vs 61.9% [95% CI, 56.0%-67.8%], P < .001). The distribution of the number vs sizes of the flow voids was skewed in both unaveraged and averaged images. A linear log-log plot of the distribution showed a more homogeneous distribution in the averaged images compared with the unaveraged images. Conclusions and Relevance: Multiple en face averaging can improve visualization of the choriocapillaris on OCTA images, transforming the images from a granular appearance to a level where the intervascular spaces can be resolved in healthy volunteers.
Authors: Emily D Cole; Eduardo A Novais; Ricardo N Louzada; Eric M Moult; Byung-Kun Lee; Andre J Witkin; Nadia K Waheed; Jay S Duker; Caroline R Baumal Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Robert F Mullins; Desi P Schoo; Elliott H Sohn; Miles J Flamme-Wiese; Grefachew Workamelahu; Rebecca M Johnston; Kai Wang; Budd A Tucker; Edwin M Stone Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2014-09-07 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: David R P Almeida; Li Zhang; Eric K Chin; Robert F Mullins; Murat Kucukevcilioglu; D Brice Critser; Milan Sonka; Edwin M Stone; James C Folk; Michael D Abràmoff; Stephen R Russell Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Robert F Mullins; Micaela N Johnson; Elizabeth A Faidley; Jessica M Skeie; Jian Huang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Nieraj Jain; Yali Jia; Simon S Gao; Xinbo Zhang; Richard G Weleber; David Huang; Mark E Pennesi Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Giselle Lynch; Jorge S Andrade Romo; Rachel Linderman; Brian D Krawitz; Shelley Mo; Amir Zakik; Joseph Carroll; Richard B Rosen; Toco Y P Chui Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Yingying Shi; Qinqin Zhang; Fang Zheng; Jonathan F Russell; Elie H Motulsky; James T Banta; Zhongdi Chu; Hao Zhou; Nimesh A Patel; Luis de Sisternes; Mary K Durbin; William Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Ruikang K Wang; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jost L Lauermann; Y Xu; P Heiduschka; M Treder; F Alten; N Eter; M Alnawaiseh Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jesse J Jung; Daryle Jason G Yu; Anne Zeng; Michael H Chen; Yue Shi; Marco Nassisi; Kenneth M Marion; Srinivas R Sadda; Quan V Hoang Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Yingying Shi; Zhongdi Chu; Liang Wang; Qinqin Zhang; William Feuer; Luis de Sisternes; Mary K Durbin; Giovanni Gregori; Ruikang K Wang; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Fang Zheng; Qinqin Zhang; Yingying Shi; Jonathan F Russell; Elie H Motulsky; James T Banta; Zhongdi Chu; Hao Zhou; Nimesh A Patel; Luis de Sisternes; Mary K Durbin; William Feuer; Giovanni Gregori; Ruikang Wang; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 5.258