| Literature DB >> 32428302 |
Xuexun Li1, Jianping Li2, Hongxia Chu2, Xingpeng Liu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from left ventricular (LV) summit remain challenging for the risk of coronary artery injury. Computed tomographic or intracardiac echocardiography may be helpful, but both still have many limitations. CartoUNIVU module has rarely been used in PVC ablation.Entities:
Keywords: catheter ablation; left ventricular summit; premature ventricular contraction; ventricular arrhythmia
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32428302 PMCID: PMC7462194 DOI: 10.1002/clc.23390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cardiol ISSN: 0160-9289 Impact factor: 2.882
FIGURE 1Electrocardiography of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) from left ventricular (LV) summit
Basic characteristics of the patients in the study
| Sample size | 22 |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 56.4 ± 13.3 |
| Male, n (%) | 14 (63.6%) |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 10 (45.5%) |
| CAD, n (%) | 7 (46.7%) |
| LVEF (%) | 62.7 ± 4.4 |
| Ablation failure history, n (%) | 6 (27.3%) |
Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.
FIGURE 2Integration of fixed fluoroscopy images into the 3D electroanatomical mapping system. A, RAO30° and, B, LAO45°. IVC, inferior vena cava; GCV, great cardiac vein; RA, right atrium; SVC, superior vena cava; TC, tricuspid valve
Procedural characteristics
| Sample size | 22 |
|---|---|
| Procedural time, min | 78.6 ± 22.7 |
| Fluoroscopy time, min | 12.5 ± 3.1 |
| Ablation time, min | 7.5 ± 3.1 |
| Distance between the target and coronary artery, mm | 8.0 ± 3.1 |
| Successful ablation area | |
| GCV, n (%) | 3 (13.6) |
| LCC, n (%) | 6 (27.3) |
| LV, n (%) | 4 (18.2) |
| AMC, n (%) | 7 (31.8) |
| LCC‐RCC commissure, n (%) | 2 (9.1) |
| Ablation success, n (%) | 22 (100) |
Abbreviations: AMC, aortic mitral commissure; GCV, giant cardiac vein; LCC, left coronary cusp; LV, left ventricular.