BACKGROUND: Epicardial left ventricular (LV) idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) can be approached via the pericardial space, the coronary venous system (CVS), or other surrounding structures. The anatomic relationships between epicardial sites of origin (SOO) of VAs and surrounding anatomic structures have not been systematically described. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 17 patients with idiopathic epicardial VAs, the relationships between the SOO and the CVS and other neighboring anatomic structures were assessed by computed tomographic angiography. Ablation was successful in 12/17 patients (71%). In 10/17 patients, the SOO was at a distance of ≤4 mm from a coronary artery. The SOO was closer to the CVS (2.1 ± 1.5 mm) than to the pericardial space (9.7 ± 3.7 mm) or the LV endocardium (7.7 ± 2.7 mm). Successful ablations were carried out from the CVS (n = 3), the CVS and LV endocardium (n = 5), the CVS and the aortic cusp (n = 1), the CVS, the LV endocardium, and the aortic cusp (n = 1), the LV endocardium (n = 1), and the CVS and the pericardial space (n = 1). In the remaining 5 patients, a subxyphoid pericardial ablation procedure was attempted and failed in all 5 patients. CONCLUSION: The CVS is closer to the SOO of epicardial idiopathic VAs than the pericardial space, the ventricular endocardium, and the aortic cusps. Given the proximity to coronary arteries at the SOO, radiofrequency energy often cannot be safely delivered to eliminate a VA and ablation may also need to be performed from adjacent structures. A subxyphoid pericardial ablation procedure has a low probability of success in patients with idiopathic epicardial VAs.
BACKGROUND: Epicardial left ventricular (LV) idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) can be approached via the pericardial space, the coronary venous system (CVS), or other surrounding structures. The anatomic relationships between epicardial sites of origin (SOO) of VAs and surrounding anatomic structures have not been systematically described. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 17 patients with idiopathic epicardial VAs, the relationships between the SOO and the CVS and other neighboring anatomic structures were assessed by computed tomographic angiography. Ablation was successful in 12/17 patients (71%). In 10/17 patients, the SOO was at a distance of ≤4 mm from a coronary artery. The SOO was closer to the CVS (2.1 ± 1.5 mm) than to the pericardial space (9.7 ± 3.7 mm) or the LV endocardium (7.7 ± 2.7 mm). Successful ablations were carried out from the CVS (n = 3), the CVS and LV endocardium (n = 5), the CVS and the aortic cusp (n = 1), the CVS, the LV endocardium, and the aortic cusp (n = 1), the LV endocardium (n = 1), and the CVS and the pericardial space (n = 1). In the remaining 5 patients, a subxyphoid pericardial ablation procedure was attempted and failed in all 5 patients. CONCLUSION: The CVS is closer to the SOO of epicardial idiopathic VAs than the pericardial space, the ventricular endocardium, and the aortic cusps. Given the proximity to coronary arteries at the SOO, radiofrequency energy often cannot be safely delivered to eliminate a VA and ablation may also need to be performed from adjacent structures. A subxyphoid pericardial ablation procedure has a low probability of success in patients with idiopathic epicardial VAs.
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Philip L Mar; Mamta Barmeda; Marcelle A Stucky; Subodh R Devabahktuni; Jason Garlie; John M Miller; Rahul Jain Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2020-02-18