| Literature DB >> 32422858 |
Alfonso Varela-López1, Pedro Bullón2, César L Ramírez-Tortosa3, María D Navarro-Hortal1, María Robles-Almazán4, Beatriz Bullón2, Mario D Cordero5,6, Maurizio Battino7,8,9, José L Quiles1,10.
Abstract
Increasing evidence connects periodontitis with a variety of systemic diseases, including metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The proposal of this study was to evaluate the role of diets rich in saturated fat and cholesterol in some aspects of periodontal diseases in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced model of periodontal disease in rabbits and to assess the influence of a periodontal intervention on hyperlipidemia, atherosclerosis, and NAFLD progression to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Male rabbits were maintained on a commercial standard diet or a diet rich in saturated fat (3% lard w/w) and cholesterol (1.3% w/w) (HFD) for 40 days. Half of the rabbits on each diet were treated 2 days per week with intragingival injections of LPS from Porphyromonas gingivalis. Morphometric analyses revealed that LPS induced higher alveolar bone loss (ABL) around the first premolar in animals receiving standard diets, which was exacerbated by the HFD diet. A higher score of acinar inflammation in the liver and higher blood levels of triglycerides and phospholipids were found in HFD-fed rabbits receiving LPS. These results suggest that certain dietary habits can exacerbate some aspects of periodontitis and that bad periodontal health can contribute to dyslipidemia and promote NAFLD progression, but only under certain conditions.Entities:
Keywords: NASH; atherogenic; atherosclerosis; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; periodontal diseases; periodontitis; rabbits
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32422858 PMCID: PMC7284766 DOI: 10.3390/nu12051405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Blood biochemistry.
| Marker | SD | HFD | SD + LPS | HFD + LPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 158.3 ± 21.0 a | 348.0 ± 28.3 b | 129.1 ± 20.5 a | 424.9 ± 41.3 b |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 89.9 ± 15.7 a | 386.2 ± 51.0 b | 55.0 ± 9.9 a | 845.0 ± 254.2 c |
| Phospholipids (mg/dL) | 63.1 ± 4.6 a | 586.2 ± 82.6 b | 57.5 ± 3.6 a | 915.9 ± 254.2 c |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 1.3 ± 0.3 a | 113.7 ± 5.2 b | 2.7 ± 0.6 a | 139.7 ± 14.3 b |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 16.6 ± 1.3 a | 138.7 ± 5.2 b | 14.5 ± 2.2 a | 187.4 ± 34.5 b |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 89.9 ± 15.7 a | 386.2 ± 51.0 b | 55.0 ± 9.9 a | 845.0 ± 254.2 b |
| LDH (U/L) | 334.3 ± 36.0 | 303.0 ± 61.6 | 379.1 ± 100.6 | 208.9 ± 59.6 |
| GGT (U/L) | 9.0 ± 0.2 a | 17.1 ± 6.0 a | 7.8 ± 1.2 a | 57.7 ± 17.6 b |
| ALT (U/L) | 28.5 ± 8.2 | 56.5 ± 21.7 | 28.8 ± 4.9 | 25.8 ± 10.2 |
| AST (U/L) | 42.4 ± 8.3 | 53.7 ± 11.4 | 49.3 ± 15.7 | 66.1 ± 16.9 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 2.8 ± 1.1 a,b | 5.5 ± 1.1 b | 1.6 ± 0.2 a | 10.6 ± 2.4 c |
| Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.6 ± 0.0 a | 3.2 ± 0.6 b | 0.4 ± 0.0 a | 3.7 ± 0.8 b |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.2 ± 0.1 a | 2.7 ± 0.2 b | 1.5 ± 0.1 a | 2.4 ± 0.7 a,b |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 1.3 ± 0.7 a | 34.0 ± 6.5 b | 0.7 ± 0.2 a | 65.4 ± 15.4 c |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 15.9 ± 1.1 a | 11.0 ± 8.2 a,b | 17.8 ± 2.5 a,b | 22.8 ± 2.4 b |
Abbreviations: AU, Arbitrary units; SD, Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD, high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; SD + LPS, Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS, High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine transaminase; CK, creatine kinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LDL: low-density lipoprotein. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Histopathological analysis of aorta and liver.
| SD | HFD | SD + LPS | HFD + LPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Aortic arch (AU) | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 2.38 ± 0.32 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.50 ± 0.22 b |
| Thoracic aorta (AU) | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 1.00 ± 0.19 c | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.33 ± 0.21 b |
| Abdominal aorta (AU) | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.25 ± 0.16 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.43 ± 0.22 b |
|
| ||||
| Steatosis (hepatocytes %) | 0.5 ± 0.5 a | 65.25 ± 7.09 b | 2.25 ± 1.48 a | 73.57 ± 19.11 b |
| Lobular inflammation (inflammatory foci/20 HPF) | 0.38 ± 0.26 a | 1.5 ± 0.54 b | 0.63 ± 0.63 a | 3 ± 0.57 c |
| Ballooning degeneration (AU) | 0.75 ± 0.31 a,b | 1.63 ± 0.18 b | 0 ± 0 a | 1.4 ± 0.29 b |
| NASH score (AU) | 1 ± 0.42 a | 5.125 ± 0.52 b | 0.63 ± 0.38 a | 5.86 ± 0.67 b |
Abbreviations: AU, Arbitrary units; SD, Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD, high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; SD + LPS, Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS, High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HPF, high-power field. Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Different superscript letters indicate statistically significant differences between experimental groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Gingival epithelium thickness. (a) Epithelium thickness measurements. Columns and error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean, respectively. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in thickness between the groups. (b) Histological section images. Dimension lines represent the thickness of the epithelium. Abbreviations: SD: Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD: high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HPF: high-power field; SD + LPS: Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS: High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 2Distance from the gingival epithelium to the periosteum. (a) Histological section images. Dimension lines represent the distance between the gingival epithelium and the periosteum. (b) Distance from the gingival epithelium to the periosteum measurements. Columns and error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean, respectively. Abbreviations: SD: Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD: high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HPF: high power field; SD + LPS: Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS: High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 3Gingival fibrosis. (a) Histological section images. Fibrosis of each gum sample was assessed in Masson’s Trichrome stained sections calculating the area and percentage of collagen located in the chorion of the mucosa. (b) Fibrosis values. Columns and error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean, respectively. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the line between the groups. Abbreviations: SD: Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD: high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HPF: high power field; SD + LPS: Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS: High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 4Gingival stroma cellularity. (a) Histological section images. (b) Cell amount. Columns and error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the line between the groups. Abbreviations: SD: Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD: high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HPF: high power field; SD + LPS: Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS: High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide.
Figure 5Histological features in gingival tissue II. (a) Chorion deposits of foamy macrophages. The black arrow is on the baseline epithelium of the gingiva. Hematoxylin and eosin 40X; (b) Macrophages count in the gingiva of the rabbits; (c) Gingival inflammatory infiltrate; Abbreviations: SD: Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD: high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HPF: high-power field; SD + LPS: Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD+LPS: High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Columns and error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean, respectively. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the line between the groups.
Figure 6Alveolar bone losses in rabbits. (a) Alveolar bone loss in the experimental groups. Columns and error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean, respectively. Asterisks (*) represent statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the line between the groups. (b) Images of the jaws stained with methylene blue show how bone resorption has been measured from the top of the cementoenamel junction of the tooth (upper part of the red mark) to the alveolar bone crest (lower part of the red mark). Abbreviations: SD: Standard diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD: high fat diet-fed rabbits non-treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; SD + LPS: Standard diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide; HFD + LPS: High fat diet-fed rabbits treated with bacterial lipopolysaccharide.