Andrew Wentzel1, Peter Hanula2, Lisanne V van Dijk3, Baher Elgohari4, Abdallah S R Mohamed3, Carlos E Cardenas5, Clifton D Fuller3, David M Vock6, Guadalupe Canahuate7, G E Marai8. 1. Department of Computer Science, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA. Electronic address: awentze2@uic.edu. 2. Department of Computer Science, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt. 5. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 6. Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 7. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA. 8. Department of Computer Science, The University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA. Electronic address: gmarai@uic.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Using a 200 Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patient cohort, we employ patient similarity based on tumor location, volume, and proximity to organs at risk to predict radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) in a new patient receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients were treated using curative-intent IMRT. Anatomical features were extracted from contrast-enhanced tomography scans acquired pre-treatment. Patient similarity was computed using a topological similarity measure, which allowed for the prediction of normal tissues' mean doses. We performed feature selection and clustering, and used the resulting groups of patients to forecast RAD. We used Logistic Regression (LG) cross-validation to assess the potential toxicity risk of these groupings. RESULTS: Out of 200 patients, 34 patients were recorded as having RAD. Patient clusters were significantly correlated with RAD (p < .0001). The area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) using pre-established, baseline features gave a predictive accuracy of 0.79, while the addition of our cluster labels improved accuracy to 0.84. CONCLUSION: Our results show that spatial information available pre-treatment can be used to robustly identify groups of RAD high-risk patients. We identify feature sets that considerably improve toxicity risk prediction beyond what is possible using baseline features. Our results also suggest that similarity-based predicted mean doses to organs can be used as valid predictors of risk to organs.
PURPOSE: Using a 200 Head and Neck cancer (HNC) patient cohort, we employ patient similarity based on tumor location, volume, and proximity to organs at risk to predict radiation-associated dysphagia (RAD) in a new patient receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients were treated using curative-intent IMRT. Anatomical features were extracted from contrast-enhanced tomography scans acquired pre-treatment. Patient similarity was computed using a topological similarity measure, which allowed for the prediction of normal tissues' mean doses. We performed feature selection and clustering, and used the resulting groups of patients to forecast RAD. We used Logistic Regression (LG) cross-validation to assess the potential toxicity risk of these groupings. RESULTS: Out of 200 patients, 34 patients were recorded as having RAD. Patient clusters were significantly correlated with RAD (p < .0001). The area under the receiver-operator curve (AUC) using pre-established, baseline features gave a predictive accuracy of 0.79, while the addition of our cluster labels improved accuracy to 0.84. CONCLUSION: Our results show that spatial information available pre-treatment can be used to robustly identify groups of RAD high-risk patients. We identify feature sets that considerably improve toxicity risk prediction beyond what is possible using baseline features. Our results also suggest that similarity-based predicted mean doses to organs can be used as valid predictors of risk to organs.
Authors: Kim Wopken; Hendrik P Bijl; Arjen van der Schaaf; Hans Paul van der Laan; Olga Chouvalova; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Patricia Doornaert; Ben J Slotman; Sjoukje F Oosting; Miranda E M C Christianen; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jan L N Roodenburg; C René Leemans; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: A Wentzel; P Hanula; T Luciani; B Elgohari; H Elhalawani; G Canahuate; D Vock; C D Fuller; G E Marai Journal: IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 4.579
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Shao Hui Huang; Jie Su; Adam S Garden; Erich M Sturgis; Kristina Dahlstrom; Nancy Lee; Nadeem Riaz; Xin Pei; Shlomo A Koyfman; David Adelstein; Brian B Burkey; Jeppe Friborg; Claus A Kristensen; Anita B Gothelf; Frank Hoebers; Bernd Kremer; Ernst-Jan Speel; Daniel W Bowles; David Raben; Sana D Karam; Eugene Yu; Wei Xu Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Lisette van der Molen; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Rianne de Jong; Maya A van Rossum; Ludi E Smeele; Coen R N Rasch; Frans J M Hilgers Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Musaddiq J Awan; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Jan S Lewin; Charles A Baron; G Brandon Gunn; David I Rosenthal; F Christopher Holsinger; David L Schwartz; Clifton D Fuller; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Miranda E M C Christianen; Cornelis Schilstra; Ivo Beetz; Christina T Muijs; Olga Chouvalova; Fred R Burlage; Patricia Doornaert; Phil W Koken; C René Leemans; Rico N P M Rinkel; Marieke J de Bruijn; G H de Bock; Jan L N Roodenburg; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Ben J Slotman; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Hendrik P Bijl; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Johannes A Langendijk; Patricia Doornaert; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Charles R Leemans; Neil K Aaronson; Ben J Slotman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carla Floricel; Nafiul Nipu; Mikayla Biggs; Andrew Wentzel; Guadalupe Canahuate; Lisanne Van Dijk; Abdallah Mohamed; C David Fuller; G Elisabeta Marai Journal: IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 4.579
Authors: Mikayla Biggs; Carla Floricel; Lisanne Van Dijk; Abdallah S R Mohamed; C David Fuller; G Elisabeta Marai; Xinhua Zhang; Guadalupe Canahuate Journal: Artif Intell Med Conf Artif Intell Med (2005-) Date: 2021-06-08
Authors: Yaohua Wang; Lisanne Van Dijk; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton David Fuller; Xinhua Zhang; G Elisabeta Marai; Guadalupe Canahuate Journal: Proc Int Database Eng Appl Symp Date: 2021-09-07
Authors: Elisa Tardini; Xinhua Zhang; Guadalupe Canahuate; Andrew Wentzel; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Lisanne Van Dijk; Clifton D Fuller; G Elisabeta Marai Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Andrew Wentzel; Timothy Luciani; Lisanne V van Dijk; Nicolette Taku; Baher Elgohari; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Guadalupe Canahuate; Clifton D Fuller; David M Vock; G Elisabeta Marai Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 6.901
Authors: Harsh Patel; David M Vock; G Elisabeta Marai; Clifton D Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Guadalupe Canahuate Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 4.379