Hematite (α-Fe2O3) is one of the most investigated anode materials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Its efficiency improves by doping with Ti, but the underlying mechanisms are not understood. One hurdle is separating the influence of doping on conductivity, surface states, and morphology, which all affect performance. To address this complexity, one needs well-defined model systems. We build such a model system by growing single-crystalline, atomically flat Ti-doped α-Fe2O3(11̅02) films by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). We characterize their surfaces, combining in situ scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) with density functional theory (DFT), and reveal how dilute Ti impurities modify the atomic-scale structure of the surface as a function of the oxygen chemical potential and Ti content. Ti preferentially substitutes subsurface Fe and causes a local restructuring of the topmost surface layers. Based on the experimental quantification of Ti-induced surface modifications and the structural model we have established, we propose a strategy that can be used to separate the effects of Ti-induced modifications to the surface atomic and electronic structures and bulk conductivity on the reactivity of Ti-doped hematite.
Hematite (α-Fe2O3) is one of the most investigated anode materials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Its efficiency improves by doping with Ti, but the underlying mechanisms are not understood. One hurdle is separating the influence of doping on conductivity, surface states, and morphology, which all affect performance. To address this complexity, one needs well-defined model systems. We build such a model system by growing single-crystalline, atomically flat Ti-doped α-Fe2O3(11̅02) films by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). We characterize their surfaces, combining in situ scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) with density functional theory (DFT), and reveal how dilute Ti impurities modify the atomic-scale structure of the surface as a function of the oxygen chemical potential and Ti content. Ti preferentially substitutes subsurface Fe and causes a local restructuring of the topmost surface layers. Based on the experimental quantification of Ti-induced surface modifications and the structural model we have established, we propose a strategy that can be used to separate the effects of Ti-induced modifications to the surface atomic and electronic structures and bulk conductivity on the reactivity of Ti-doped hematite.
It
has been almost half a century since sunlight was first used
to produce hydrogen via photoelectrochemical water splitting.[1] Since then, generations of scientists have searched
for ideal anodic materials and ways to improve their performance.
Hematite (α-Fe2O3; for simplicity of notation,
we will drop the “α” from now on) has long been
a leading player in the scene. Theoretically, hematite enables a solar-to-hydrogen
conversion efficiency of 15%, and with its high stability,[2] nontoxicity, and low cost,[3,4] it
is an ideal anode material. In practice, some of its intrinsic properties
severely limit performance, in particular fast charge recombination,
low conductivity, and poor kinetics for water oxidation.[3,4] Lightly doping the material with Ti has proven to be a good strategy
to improve the electrocatalytic performance.[5−9] Scaling of the performance with the doping level
is, however, not trivial.[7,8]To explain how
Ti doping enhances the solar-to-hydrogen conversion
efficiency, one first needs to understand how the dopants affect the
oxygen evolution reaction (OER), a crucial reaction occurring at the
surfaces of hematite photoanodes.[4] This
requires disentangling the properties of hematite that can affect
the OER and are possibly doping-dependent, such as the electrical
conductivity in the bulk and at the surface,[7] the morphology and the surface crystallographic orientation,[6,8,10,11] its atomic-scale structure,[8,12,13] and the surface states that are involved in the relevant processes.[14] The most commonly synthesized Ti-doped hematite
electrodes do not allow this, though, because their nanostructured
morphologies are neither easily controlled nor modeled.[4,8] Moreover, in nanostructured electrodes, both the morphology and
the photoelectrochemical activity are affected by the doping level,
e.g., via passivation of grain boundaries by the dopants.[6] Single-crystalline samples with atomically defined
surfaces are best suited for disentangling the contributions from
structural, morphological, electronic, and crystallographic effects.[9,12]Well-defined epitaxial Ti-doped hematite (Ti:Fe2O3) films with a (0001) orientation have been successfully
grown
by oxygen-plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)[9,15] and have provided valuable insights into the relation between Ti-induced
conductivity and photoelectrochemical activity. However, so far, it
has not been investigated how the atomic-scale details of the film
surfaces are modified by Ti impurities and how this precisely affects
the OER at hematite surfaces. This is partly due to the ongoing controversy
over the atomic-scale structure of (0001)-oriented Fe2O3.[12,16] In this respect, the less investigated (11̅02)
orientation (or “R-cut”) of hematite is a better-suited
model system. Recent surface science experiments combined with density
functional theory (DFT) studies[17,18] of pure (undoped) Fe2O3 have unveiled two relatively simple surface
terminations of this facet that are stable under ultrahigh vacuum
(UHV) conditions: the stoichiometric, bulk-truncated (1 × 1)
(see Figure ) and
the reduced (2 × 1) surfaces. Both surface structures can be
reproducibly prepared by standard sputtering–annealing cycles
at appropriate oxygen chemical potentials. Their reliable experimental
realization and the availability of a confirmed, atomic-scale model
make Fe2O3(11̅02) an ideal model system
to investigate how Ti impurities affect hematite surfaces.
Figure 1
Perspective
(top) and side view (bottom, looking along the [1̅101]
direction) of the (1 × 1) termination of the Fe2O3(11̅02) surface, as in ref (17). The direction perpendicular to the surface
is labeled (11̅02) in round brackets because there is no integer-index
vector corresponding to that direction for the (11̅02) plane.
The structure is characterized by zigzag rows of oxygen (small, red
spheres) and iron atoms (large, brown spheres) and has a unit cell
measuring 5.04 × 5.44 Å2 (black rectangle). The
coordination of Fe cations is indicated in round brackets, and labels
for the first few anion and cation layers are indicated on the right
side.
Perspective
(top) and side view (bottom, looking along the [1̅101]
direction) of the (1 × 1) termination of the Fe2O3(11̅02) surface, as in ref (17). The direction perpendicular to the surface
is labeled (11̅02) in round brackets because there is no integer-index
vector corresponding to that direction for the (11̅02) plane.
The structure is characterized by zigzag rows of oxygen (small, red
spheres) and iron atoms (large, brown spheres) and has a unit cell
measuring 5.04 × 5.44 Å2 (black rectangle). The
coordination of Fe cations is indicated in round brackets, and labels
for the first few anion and cation layers are indicated on the right
side.Doping this system with Ti should
enhance its conductivity,[6,7] a bonus for scanning
tunneling microscopy (STM). Typically, contaminant-free,
undoped Fe2O3(11̅02) single crystals are
not conductive enough for STM unless their bulk is reduced by repeated
sputtering–annealing cycles (60–100) to introduce oxygen
vacancies.[17] This treatment roughens the
surface, though, complicating STM measurements and the interpretation
of reactivity studies. Increasing the conductivity with Ti doping
would cut the need for harsh sputtering treatments, thus facilitating
and stimulating more surface science studies on this promising system.We produced single-crystalline Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02)
films by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). In previous works, we showed
that metal oxide films with atomically flat surfaces suited for surface
science investigations can be obtained by PLD, provided that the growth
parameters are carefully optimized (e.g., one has to tune the oxygen
background pressure and the substrate temperature that can affect
both the growth mode and the film morphology).[19−21] The introduction
of a dopant such as Ti adds the challenge of controlling both the
doping concentration and its distribution within the film. Doped films
can be grown by PLD, either from a single, doped target or by alternating
deposition from two targets. The latter approach yields high flexibility
in tuning the doping level but requires a careful calibration of the
deposited amounts: sticking effects, the oxygen chemical potential,
and the laser fluence can all affect the species deposited by PLD.[21,22]In this work, we optimized the PLD growth conditions for well-defined,
single-crystalline Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) films.
We tuned their doping level by alternating between Fe3O4 and TiO2 targets during deposition. We observed
that Ti partially segregates to the surface during growth, and we
found standard sputtering–annealing treatments to be effective
in removing this excess. For the doping levels explored in this work
(up to 3.1 atom %), the (2 × 1) surface of undoped Fe2O3(11̅02) single crystals appears unmodified by
the presence of Ti. On the (1 × 1) termination, line defects
are formed locally, but the surface is otherwise largely undisturbed.
With support from DFT, we investigated in depth how Ti affects the
(1 × 1) surface over a variety of oxygen chemical potentials.
Theory predicts that Ti preferentially substitutes Fe in the subsurface
layer, causing the formation of the line defects observed in experiments.The careful characterization of our Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) model surfaces allows us to set the stage for future
reactivity studies. We propose a strategy to disentangle the contributions
of the surface atomic and electronic structures and of the bulk conductivity
to the OER activity. We identify the coverage of line defects and
the surface doping as suitable descriptors for the surface atomic
and electronic structures, respectively, and highlight the unique
dependencies of these descriptors on the oxygen chemical potential,
the amount of Ti deposited after growth, and the bulk doping. One
can use these quantitative relations to shed light on the mechanisms
ruling the photocatalytic water-splitting activity of Fe2O3 model surfaces.
Experimental
and Computational Methods
Experimental Setup
The Ti:Fe2O3 films were deposited in a UHV
PLD chamber suited
for high-temperature and high-pressure depositions (base pressure
below 4 × 10 mbar after bake-out).[19] Substrate temperatures up to 1200 °C can
be reached, and background pressures can be up to 1 mbar while monitoring
the growth via reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED;
a doubly differentially pumped TorrRHEED gun from STAIB Instruments
GmbH, 35 keV beam energy). An ultraviolet KrF excimer laser was used
for growth (Coherent CompexPro 201, 248 nm, ∼20 ns pulses).
During growth, the sample was heated by a collimated continuous-wave
infrared laser (DILAS, 980 nm) directed on the back of the sample
through a hole in the sample plate, and O2 was dosed via
a leak valve. The temperature was monitored with an Impac IGA5 pyrometer
directed on the sample surface. The PLD chamber is connected via a
UHV transfer chamber with a surface science system with base pressure
below 5 × 10 mbar. This system
comprises an analysis chamber equipped with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS; Omicron nonmonochromatic Mg/Al Kα source, SPECS Phoibos
100 analyzer), low-energy electron diffraction (LEED; Omicron SpectaLEED),
and STM (SPECS Aarhus 150), as well as a preparation chamber where
Ar+-sputtering–annealing cycles can be performed
(typical parameters: 8 × 10 mbar
Ar, 1 keV, ∼6 μA, 12 min, plus annealing at the
conditions specified in the text). Some of the films were measured
in a separate, two-chamber UHV system, consisting of a preparation
chamber (base pressure <1 × 10 mbar) and an analysis chamber (base pressure <7 × 10 mbar), equipped with a commercial LEED
module (VSI), a nonmonochromatic Mg Kα X-ray source (VG), and
a SPECS Phoibos 100 analyzer for XPS, as well as an Omicron μ-STM
operated in constant-current mode. The preparation chamber of this
second UHV setup contains an electron-beam evaporator (Omicron), which
was used for deposition of Ti, and a quartz-crystal microbalance.
Substrates
Natural Fe2O3(11̅02) single crystals were used as substrates
(SurfaceNet GmbH, 5 × 5 × 0.5 mm3, one-side polished,
<0.3° miscut). To remove contamination resulting from polishing,
the as-received samples were sonicated in heated neutral detergent
(3% Extran MA 02, 2 × 30 min) and ultrapure water (Milli-Q, 10
min). To overcome the insulating nature of the (nominally undoped)
substrate, and ensure electrical contact of the conductive film to
the sample plate, Pt electrodes were deposited by magnetron sputtering
on the substrate prior to the film growth (the Pt covering the front
corners, sides, and a 0.5 mm-wide frame at the edge of the backside
of the sample), as described elsewhere.[21] The substrate was then mounted on an HNO3-cleaned Nicrofer
(high-temperature- and oxidation-resistant alloy) sample plate with
Nicrofer clips (spot-welded onto the plate) and inserted into the
UHV PLD system. Two cycles of Ar+ sputtering plus O2 annealing (1 h, 1 mbar, 900 °C) were performed prior
to each growth. This procedure yields contaminant-free surfaces (as
judged by XPS, not shown): neither typical contaminants coming from
the ex situ treatment (C, K, Na, Ca) nor foreign metals commonly present
in natural hematite crystals (e.g., Mn, Cr) were observed in the survey
spectra recorded with 50 eV pass energy (neither at normal nor at
grazing emission). Moreover, the surfaces are atomically flat, as
judged by ex situ atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Agilent 5500 ambient
AFM in intermittent contact mode in air with Si tips on Si cantilevers).
Growth Parameters
The films were
deposited by alternating deposition from Fe3O4 and TiO2 single-crystal targets. To remove contamination
from the target surfaces, they were preablated before each growth
by scanning them so that the excimer laser beam hit at least 10 times
each spot of the area later ablated for deposition. During preablation,
the substrate was kept in a separate, interconnected UHV chamber.
The substrate temperature and O2 background pressure, as
well as the doping level, were chosen to comply with three main (intertwined)
constraints: (i) stabilize the oxidized hematite phase; (ii) achieve
sufficient diffusion during growth to yield well-ordered, single-crystalline
films; and (iii) ensure a dilute, uniform distribution of Ti dopants
within the film. The hematite phase was stabilized by selecting appropriate
combinations of pressure and temperature, as inferred from the phase
stability diagram of iron oxides from the literature.[23] To achieve the highest possible crystallinity, we opted
for temperatures enforcing a step-flow regime, i.e., above 800 °C,
as judged by the real-time behavior of the intensity of the RHEED
specular spot during growth. Below 750 °C, RHEED oscillations
consistent with a layer-by-layer growth were observed instead. We
chose a growth temperature of 850 °C to achieve a uniform distribution
of the Ti dopants in the bulk of the film (more details in Section S2 of the Supporting Information). The
films discussed in this paper were grown at 850 °C, 2 ×
10 mbar O2, 2.0 J/cm2, 5 Hz, and 60 °C/min ramp rate for heating and cooling
and with no postannealing after growth. The doping levels of 0.8 and
3.1 atom % were achieved by running an automated growth
recipe consisting of 120 cycles in which one (or three, for 3.1 atom
%) laser pulse(s) was shot on the TiO2 target, followed
by 500 (375) laser pulses shot on the Fe3O4 target.
The low-doped films [120 cycles of (500 + 1) laser pulses] are of
91.5 ± 7.4 nm thickness, as evaluated from stylus profilometer
measurements (not shown).
XPS Analysis
The
intensity of the
Ti 2p peaks was evaluated in CasaXPS by normalizing their area to
the O 1s peak, after subtracting the normalized intensity of the O
1s satellite (originating from the Kβ line of the Al X-ray source)
superimposed to this feature. The intensity and line shape of the
O 1s satellite was previously measured on an undoped Fe2O3(11̅02) reference sample. All XPS peak areas were
evaluated after subtracting a Shirley-type background.
Definition of a Monolayer (ML)
Fe2O3 is composed of cation bilayers along the (11̅02)
direction, where each bilayer contains four Fe atoms per (1 ×
1) surface unit cell (see Figure ). In the following, we define one monolayer (ML) as
the number of Fe atoms in one cation layer per (1 × 1) surface
unit cell of Fe2O3(11̅02), i.e., two Fe
atoms per (1 × 1) surface unit cell, or 7.3 × 1014 atoms/cm2. Therefore, each cation bilayer of Fe2O3(11̅02) contains 2 ML of Fe.
Evaluation of Trench Coverages
Trench
coverages (θ) were evaluated with the image-processing software
ImageJ[24] and correspond to the fractional
amount (in monolayers) of missing Fe atoms in the topmost cation layer.
The trench coverages reported were obtained by averaging the values
measured on at least 10 atomically resolved 50 × 50 nm2 STM images acquired at different spots on the sample. To evaluate
the number of missing Fe atoms at the surface, a skeletonized mask
selecting only the lattice position of surface Fe atoms was overlaid
to the image (this mask was created from the maxima of the Fourier-filtered
image). A threshold function was then applied to the area of the image
under the mask to count the ratio of pixels of a trench with respect
to the number of total pixels selected by the mask. Regions in proximity
(∼2 nm) of steps were discarded from the analysis. Error bars
of the coverages represent 90% confidence intervals calculated with
a two-tailed Student’s t-distribution from
the standard error of the mean that was obtained by statistical evaluation
of the STM images. Error bars of derived quantities are calculated
assuming statistical independence of the quantities involved.
Definition of Experimental Oxygen Chemical
Potential
The “experimental” chemical potentials,
i.e., those derived from experimental quantities, were calculated
using the ideal gas relationwhere p0 = 1 ×
103 mbar; k is the Boltzmann constant; p and T are the oxygen pressure and
absolute temperature used in the experiment, respectively; and
μO0(T) is the chemical potential for gaseous O2 at pressure p0 and
temperature T as derived from the relation μO0(T) = HO(T, p0) – HO(0 K, p0) – T[SO(T, p0) – SO(0 K, p0)]. HO(T, p0) and SO(T, p0)
are the enthalpy and entropy per oxygen molecule, respectively,
and are derived from thermochemical tables.[25,26] “Experimental” oxygen chemical potentials are named
μOexp =
μO(T, p)/2 to distinguish them from the ones computed by DFT, μODFT, defined below.
Computational Details
All DFT calculations
employed the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package[27,28] (VASP), with the projector-augmented wave method[29,30] describing the electron–ion interactions. The Perdew, Burke,
and Ernzerhof[31] exchange–correlation
functional was employed together with a Hubbard U to treat the highly correlated Fe 3d electrons.[32] Consistent with previous studies,[17,33] we chose Ueff = 4.0 eV. This value has
been shown to best reproduce the experimental values of the band gap
and the Fe–Fe distances in the bulk of Fe2O3.[34] The same Ueff was used for the Ti dopant ions so as not to artificially
bias the 3d electron occupations among different transition-metal
cations.[35] For the best structures, calculations
were also repeated with Ueff = 5.0 eV
for Ti as derived from experiments and first-principles calculations,[35−37] with no significant changes in the relative stabilities of the structures.
The effects of the choice of Ueff on the
density of states for one exemplary structure are briefly addressed
in Section S5 of the Supporting Information.
The plane-wave basis-set cutoff energy was set to 450 eV. Asymmetric
slabs consisting of 20 atomic layers (i.e., four O–Fe–O–Fe–O
units, ≈13.3 Å slab thickness) were constructed based
on the previously optimized bulk structure. A vacuum gap of ≈16
Å was used to separate periodic images of the slab along the
direction normal to the surface.[17] Supercell
sizes for testing Ti dopant positions ranged from (2 × 1) to
(4 × 4), depending on the defects considered. A Γ-centered k-mesh of 4 × 8 × 1 was used for the (2 × 1)
cells and adjusted according to supercell size, down to 2 × 2
× 1 for the (4 × 4) slabs. All surface models were relaxed
until the residual forces acting on ions were smaller than 0.02 eV/Å.
The reference energy of a free oxygen molecule in the triplet state
in a 10 × 11 × 12 Å3 cell was calculated
with the same functional and potential as for the Fe2O3 slabs. The chemical potential of oxygen was referenced to
half of the energy of one oxygen molecule (1/2EO); in the following, we name this quantity μODFT. Notice that
this definition does not account for entropic contributions, as common
in ab initio thermodynamics.[26,38] In Section S4 of the Supporting Information, we provide estimates
for the discrepancy between μODFT and μOexp.We computed the “formation
energy” per Ti atom and per (1 × 1) unit cell of some
surface structures with Ti substituting Fe (refer to Figure and the main text) as[26]where n × m is the size of the slab in (1
× 1) unit cells; p and T are
the pressure and temperature of a gas-phase
O2 reservoir, respectively; −ΔNO and −ΔNFe are
the number of O and Fe atoms removed from the reference structure,
respectively; NTi is the number of Ti
atoms substituting Fe; E is the DFT energy of the slab; and μ(p,T) is the chemical
potential of Fe and O. To be more precise, eq yields the differences in the grand potentials
of one structure and its reference (see eq ) at constant area and constant number of
Ti atoms, assuming comparable entropic contributions. It is also related
to the difference in surface energy as Δϕ = ΔγA(1×1)/NTi, where A(1×1) is the area of one (1 × 1) cell. The energy of the reference
structure for an area of n × m unit cells is calculated aswhere E(1 × 1) is the DFT energy
of a (1 × 1)Ti structure
(Figure b), where
two Ti atoms replace Fe in layer C2 in a (2 × 1) cell (hence,
the factor 1/2), while E(1×1) is the DFT energy of a (1 × 1) cell of undoped Fe2O3(11̅02). In a nutshell, the reference energy
in eq for a given structure
with a n × m size and a number
of Ti atoms NTi is obtained by comparing
to an equivalently sized slab in which the same amount of Ti is accumulated
into the favored (1 × 1)Ti structure of Figure b. For selected structures,
we verified that eq yields the same energy as explicitly relaxing these composite slabs.
Notice that this choice of reference is natural for our system, as
the diffusion of Ti into the bulk is inhibited at the 550 °C
preparation temperature, so the number of Ti atoms in the subsurface
is constant. As a consequence of this choice of reference, eq does not contain the chemical
potential of Ti. In other words, minimizing Δϕ yields
the best structure for accommodating NTi atoms in the near-surface. Notice also that it is sufficient to
represent Δϕ as a function of μODFT, since the chemical potentials
of Fe and O are linked by the cohesive free energy of bulk hematite.[26]
Figure 6
Surface
phase diagram and structures of Ti-doped Fe2O3(11̅02) as a function of μODFT. (a) Formation energies per
Ti atom and per (1 × 1) unit cell of trench structures with different
spacings, relative to surfaces with the same amount of Ti doping in
the subsurface, but without trenches, i.e., a combination of undoped
(1 × 1) and the (1 × 1)Ti structure of panel
(b) (see Section for details). The inset shows the region around μODFT = −2.3
eV in greater detail. (b) Perspective view of the (1 × 1)Ti structure with two Ti atoms per (2 × 1) unit cell.
(c, d) Perspective views of trenches indefinitely extended along the
[11̅01̅] direction, with a periodicity of two and four
unit cells along the [112̅0] direction, respectively; (e–g)
short trenches with and without one additional oxygen vacancy (VO) per supercell. The dimensions of the supercells are indicated
in the panels.
Experimental Results
UHV-Prepared PLD Films
Figure compares
how different bulk
doping levels affect the surfaces of UHV-prepared, Fe2O3(11̅02) films with Ti doping levels of 0.77 ± 0.06
and 3.09 ± 0.24 atom %. The Ti concentrations are given in atomic
percent of cations, such that 0.77 atom % doping corresponds to x = 0.0077 in the commonly used (Fe1–Ti)2O3 notation. In Section S3 of the
Supporting Information, we describe in detail how we estimated the
doping level from an independent evaluation of the amounts of Fe and
Ti deposited with each laser pulse shot on the corresponding targets.
For simplicity of notation, we will often refer to these doping levels
as 0.8 and 3.1 atom % or as “low” and “high”.
After growth, the film surfaces were prepared following the procedures
for single-crystalline, undoped Fe2O3(11̅02)
samples.[17] One can either prepare a (2
× 1) structure under reducing conditions (Ar+ sputtering
plus UHV annealing at ≈600 °C) or a stoichiometric, bulk-terminated
(1 × 1) structure (Figure ) under slightly oxidizing conditions (Ar+ sputtering
plus annealing at >1 × 10 mbar
O2, ≈550 °C). Due to their strongly insulating
nature, hematite surfaces of undoped crystals can only be imaged in
STM after sufficient reduction of the bulk, commonly achieved with
several (60–100) sputtering–annealing cycles.[17] Remarkably, both Ti-doped films are conductive
in STM at Usample = 2 V, It = 0.1 nA at room temperature (RT) after a single sputtering–annealing
cycle. Figure a1–c1 shows the mesoscale appearance of their
surfaces after two sputtering–annealing cycles. The 50–200
nm-wide, atomically flat terraces are separated by monoatomic steps
of ≈3.5 Å height. The surface quality of these Ti-doped
films is significantly higher than that of the severely roughened
surfaces typical of undoped crystals following the harsh sputtering
treatments.
Figure 2
UHV-prepared surfaces of differently doped Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) films. (a1–c1)
40 × 40 nm2 STM images, (a2–c2) 9 × 4.5 nm2 STM images, and (a3–c3) corresponding LEED patterns. Left and middle
columns: (2 × 1) and (1 × 1) terminations, respectively,
obtained on the 0.8 atom % Ti-doped films with standard sputtering–annealing
cycles [anneal 20 min at 600 °C, UHV for the (2 × 1), and
20 min at 550 °C, 7 × 10–6 mbar O2 for the (1 × 1); the corresponding experimental oxygen
chemical potentials μOexp are ≤−1.95 and −1.55
eV, respectively; see Section for the definition of μOexp]. Except for the presence of
dark rows (one marked by a black oval), the surfaces are very similar
to those found on undoped single crystals. Right column: surface of
a 3.1 atom %-doped film after preparation at slightly oxidizing conditions
(550 °C, 7 × 10–6 mbar O2);
a mostly (1 × 1) surface is obtained, with additional dark rows
along the [11̅01̅] direction. The (1 × 1) periodicity
is seen in the close-up STM (c2); faint streaks corresponding
to an (n × 1) periodicity are observed in LEED
(c3). Preparing the 3.1 atom %-doped film at reducing conditions
results in a (2 × 1) reconstruction comparable to the one shown
in the left column (not shown).
UHV-prepared surfaces of differently doped Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) films. (a1–c1)
40 × 40 nm2 STM images, (a2–c2) 9 × 4.5 nm2 STM images, and (a3–c3) corresponding LEED patterns. Left and middle
columns: (2 × 1) and (1 × 1) terminations, respectively,
obtained on the 0.8 atom % Ti-doped films with standard sputtering–annealing
cycles [anneal 20 min at 600 °C, UHV for the (2 × 1), and
20 min at 550 °C, 7 × 10–6 mbar O2 for the (1 × 1); the corresponding experimental oxygen
chemical potentials μOexp are ≤−1.95 and −1.55
eV, respectively; see Section for the definition of μOexp]. Except for the presence of
dark rows (one marked by a black oval), the surfaces are very similar
to those found on undoped single crystals. Right column: surface of
a 3.1 atom %-doped film after preparation at slightly oxidizing conditions
(550 °C, 7 × 10–6 mbar O2);
a mostly (1 × 1) surface is obtained, with additional dark rows
along the [11̅01̅] direction. The (1 × 1) periodicity
is seen in the close-up STM (c2); faint streaks corresponding
to an (n × 1) periodicity are observed in LEED
(c3). Preparing the 3.1 atom %-doped film at reducing conditions
results in a (2 × 1) reconstruction comparable to the one shown
in the left column (not shown).On the low-doped film, we reproduced both the (1 × 1) and
the (2 × 1) surface structures known from undoped samples, as
seen from the close-up STM images (Figure a2,b2) and the LEED
patterns (Figure a3,b3). The (2 × 1) surface (Figure a2) shows paired
rows of bright protrusions running along the [11̅01̅]
direction with a 10.1 Å periodicity along the [112̅0] direction,
in agreement with STM images obtained on undoped samples.[17] The (1 × 1) surface (Figure b2) is also in line with previous
experimental reports, with zigzag lines of bright protrusions (Fe
atoms) along the [11̅01̅] direction, separated by ≈5.0
Å in the [112̅0] direction (also compare with the structural
model of Figure ).
We note that there is no evidence for Ti impurities at the (2 ×
1) surface (the observed defects are also typical for undoped single
crystals). On the (1 × 1) surface, however, some new features
are present in the form of dark rows oriented along the [11̅01̅]
direction, as highlighted by the black oval in Figure b1. Below, we argue that these
defects are induced by the presence of subsurface Ti and that they
form when a zigzag row of surface Fe atoms is missing. From an STM
evaluation of the coverage of dark lines, we can obtain the amount
of Fe atoms missing at the surface (details in Section ); on the (1 × 1) surface
of the 0.8 atom % film in Figure b1, 2.08 ± 0.39% of Fe surface
atoms are missing.On films with a 4-times larger doping level,
the same (2 ×
1) reconstruction apparently unmodified by Ti can be prepared as for
the 0.8 atom % film (not shown). However, some changes are observed
when the surface is exposed to oxidizing conditions to achieve the
(1 × 1) termination: while the mesoscale morphology is atomically
flat (Figure c1), more dark rows along the [11̅01̅] direction
appear, suggesting a correlation between dark rows and Ti doping.
Apart from the dark rows, the surface still resembles the (1 ×
1) termination. The (1 × 1) periodicity is observed in the LEED
pattern in Figure c3 (together with a faint, streaky intensity in between
the integer-order spots), and the typical zigzag lines are seen in
the close-up STM images of Figure c2. The coverage of dark rows now corresponds
to 18.4 ± 1.1% of surface Fe sites.We need to point out
that the properties of the UHV-prepared films
are somewhat different from those of the as-grown films: as we show
in Section S1 of the Supporting Information,
the conditions employed during growth result in a partialTi segregation
to the surface and in ill-defined, poorly ordered, Ti-rich phases.
By removing the excess Ti with Ar+ sputtering, we can instead
investigate the effect of minor doping levels on well-controlled hematite
surfaces. After this first sputtering–annealing cycle, the
amount of Ti at the surface remains unchanged even after tens of sputtering
cycles at standard, UHV-compatible preparation conditions. This is
seen in XPS (no change in the Ti 2p intensity) and in STM (unchanged
coverage of dark rows at the surface), indicating a uniform doping
level throughout the film. However, we observed a small increase in
the Ti content at the surface after hundreds of cycles. We attribute
this to the smaller sputter yield for Ti than for Fe and to the fact
that Ti atoms sit in the subsurface (see Section ).
Postgrowth Ti Deposition
To confirm that the dark rows are indeed associated
with
the Ti dopants, we deposited by PLD submonolayer amounts of Ti on
the surface in Figure b, i.e., on an almost defect-free (1 × 1) surface. We also deposited
Ti by MBE on an undoped Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1
× 1) sample. The results are shown in Figure a,b, respectively. Both depositions, by PLD
and MBE, result in the formation of dark rows at the surface, confirming
their correlation with Ti. Additionally, small and irregular islands
are formed; they exhibit the same (1 × 1) surface structure with
dark rows as the terrace (Figure d). In areas with a large number of dark rows, neighboring
lines assemble to form an (n × 1) periodicity,
with a local minimum spacing of n = 2 lattice units
along the [112̅0] direction. This local arrangement is also
reflected in the LEED pattern of Figure c: in between the main (1 × 1) spots,
a faint horizontal streak characteristic of an (n × 1) periodicity is visible, with enhanced intensity in the
region of half-integer spots. The similarity between PLD and MBE deposition
allows us to exclude that the dark rows are caused by sputter-induced
damage from energetic species ablated in PLD. Notice that the nominal
amounts of Ti deposited by MBE for these experiments (calibrated by
a quartz-crystal microbalance) and the coverage of trenches measured
by STM are in agreement with the one-to-one relation between Ti coverage
and trench coverage derived from our DFT model (see below).
Figure 3
Deposition
of submonolayer amounts of TiO2 on Fe2O3(11̅02). (a, b) 28 × 28 nm2 STM images
showing the effect of submonolayer deposition of Ti on
(a) a (1 × 1)-terminated 0.8 atom % Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) film such as in Figure b and (b) on an undoped Fe2O3(11̅02) substrate. Similar results are achieved both
by PLD [(a) 0.095 ML Ti, 550 °C, 2 × 10–2 mbar O2, 2 J/cm2] and by MBE [(b) 0.15 ML
Ti, 500 °C, 5 × 10–6 mbar O2]. On the terraces, dark rows along the [11̅01̅] direction
appear without significant alteration of the remaining (1 × 1)-structured
areas. Additionally, small and irregular islands are formed. (c) LEED
pattern corresponding to the surface in (b): an additional faint,
half-integer periodicity indicates areas with dark rows in a local
(2 × 1) arrangement. (d) 14.6 × 8 nm2 STM image
of the sample in (b), showing that the small islands appearing on
the surface after deposition display the same (1 × 1) periodicity
as the underlying terrace in the areas where trenches are not present.
Deposition
of submonolayer amounts of TiO2 on Fe2O3(11̅02). (a, b) 28 × 28 nm2 STM images
showing the effect of submonolayer deposition of Ti on
(a) a (1 × 1)-terminated 0.8 atom % Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) film such as in Figure b and (b) on an undoped Fe2O3(11̅02) substrate. Similar results are achieved both
by PLD [(a) 0.095 ML Ti, 550 °C, 2 × 10–2 mbar O2, 2 J/cm2] and by MBE [(b) 0.15 ML
Ti, 500 °C, 5 × 10–6 mbar O2]. On the terraces, dark rows along the [11̅01̅] direction
appear without significant alteration of the remaining (1 × 1)-structured
areas. Additionally, small and irregular islands are formed. (c) LEED
pattern corresponding to the surface in (b): an additional faint,
half-integer periodicity indicates areas with dark rows in a local
(2 × 1) arrangement. (d) 14.6 × 8 nm2 STM image
of the sample in (b), showing that the small islands appearing on
the surface after deposition display the same (1 × 1) periodicity
as the underlying terrace in the areas where trenches are not present.
Effect of μOexp on Trench Coverages
The coverage
of dark rows at the (1 × 1) surface can be controlled by varying
the bulk doping, as seen in Figure b,c. For the low-doped film, we also observed a dependence
of the coverage of dark rows on the oxygen chemical potential μOexp used during
annealing (Figure ). The almost pristine (1 × 1) surface of the 0.8 atom % doped
films in Figure a
exposes more dark rows after annealing at higher μOexp (Figure b). Specifically, the initial
2.08 ± 0.39% coverage of dark rows, observed at 550 °C,
7 × 10 mbar (μOexp = −1.55
eV), changes to 4.57 ± 1.40% after 10 min at 550 °C, 3 ×
10 mbar (μOexp = −1.25 eV). The coverage
of dark rows does not change upon further annealing at the same conditions:
a coverage of 4.03 ± 0.47% was measured after 40 min. Furthermore,
the process is fully reversible: the initial coverage of dark rows
is recovered by annealing again for 20 min at 550 °C, 7 ×
10 mbar. Intriguingly, this phenomenon
was not observed on the highly doped films: there, the coverage of
dark rows is preserved at all O2 pressures between 7 ×
10–9 mbar (μOexp = −1.79 eV) and 3 × 10–2 mbar (μOexp = −1.25 eV) at 550 °C.
Figure 4
Effect of μO on the surface structure. The density
of dark rows on the surface of a 0.8 atom %-doped Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1 × 1) film increases upon annealing
at more oxidizing conditions: (a) annealing at 550 °C, 7 ×
10–6 mbar O2, corresponding to μOexp = −1.55
eV (see Section for the definition of μOexp); (b) annealing at 550 °C, 3 ×
10–2 mbar O2, corresponding to μOexp = −1.25
eV. STM images are 40 × 40 nm2 in size and were acquired
at Usample = +2 V, It = 0.2 nA.
Effect of μO on the surface structure. The density
of dark rows on the surface of a 0.8 atom %-doped Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1 × 1) film increases upon annealing
at more oxidizing conditions: (a) annealing at 550 °C, 7 ×
10–6 mbar O2, corresponding to μOexp = −1.55
eV (see Section for the definition of μOexp); (b) annealing at 550 °C, 3 ×
10–2 mbar O2, corresponding to μOexp = −1.25
eV. STM images are 40 × 40 nm2 in size and were acquired
at Usample = +2 V, It = 0.2 nA.
Computational
Results
Preferred Sites for Ti Substitution
We performed DFT calculations to find a structural model for the
Ti-correlated dark lines that appear on the (1 × 1) surface of
our Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) films. We tested different
Ti concentrations based on the model for the (1 × 1) surface
in Figure . Since
previous works have demonstrated that dilute Ti impurities substitute
Fe,[7,15] we first tested only Ti substitution without
introducing additional defects. In a (2 × 2) supercell, we placed
a single, isolated Ti atom in five different positions, one in each
of the first five cation layers (for this set of calculations, we
used asymmetric slabs with 30 atomic layers). The corresponding energy
gains were compared to the energy gain of one Ti ion substituting
Fe in a (2 × 2 × 3) bulk supercell [containing the same
number of O, Fe, and Ti atoms as the (2 × 2) surface slabs; the
supercell volume was fixed]. The results are shown in black in Figure a. Substituting one
Fe atom for Ti in layers deeper than C3 is comparable to substitution
in the bulk, while for layers C1, C2, and C3, there is an energy gain.
Substitution in layer C2 shows the strongest energy gain (0.29 eV
gain compared to substitution in the bulk and 0.23 and 0.19 eV compared
to layers C1 and C3, respectively).
Figure 5
(a) Black: calculated formation energies
for substituting one Fe
atom by one Ti atom in a given layer in a (2 × 2) supercell of
the Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1 × 1) surface.
For these calculations (polaron not artificially removed), the reference
configuration is a bulk structure with a unit cell containing the
same number of atoms as the slabs. Red: calculated formation energies
for the same systems but with one electron artificially removed such
that the polaron is not present. In this case, Ti substitution in
layer C5 was used as a reference. (b, c) Calculated surface structures
for two Ti atoms per (2 × 1) unit cell (i.e., 0.5 ML Ti). Ti
is accumulated in layer C2 and preferentially orders in zigzag rows
along the [11̅01̅] direction. (b) (1 × 1)Ti structure, stable at reducing conditions: the structure of undoped
(1 × 1) is retained, and surface Fe atoms above Ti have a charge
state of 2+. (c) (2 × 1) trench structure, stable at oxidizing
conditions: an equal number of Fe and O atoms is removed from the
surface, allowing every remaining surface Fe to maintain a 3+ charge
state. Atoms are labeled according to their coordination with oxygen.
(a) Black: calculated formation energies
for substituting one Fe
atom by one Ti atom in a given layer in a (2 × 2) supercell of
the Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1 × 1) surface.
For these calculations (polaron not artificially removed), the reference
configuration is a bulk structure with a unit cell containing the
same number of atoms as the slabs. Red: calculated formation energies
for the same systems but with one electron artificially removed such
that the polaron is not present. In this case, Ti substitution in
layer C5 was used as a reference. (b, c) Calculated surface structures
for two Ti atoms per (2 × 1) unit cell (i.e., 0.5 ML Ti). Ti
is accumulated in layer C2 and preferentially orders in zigzag rows
along the [11̅01̅] direction. (b) (1 × 1)Ti structure, stable at reducing conditions: the structure of undoped
(1 × 1) is retained, and surface Fe atoms above Ti have a charge
state of 2+. (c) (2 × 1) trench structure, stable at oxidizing
conditions: an equal number of Fe and O atoms is removed from the
surface, allowing every remaining surface Fe to maintain a 3+ charge
state. Atoms are labeled according to their coordination with oxygen.During our calculations, we observed that introducing
one Ti dopant
always results in the formation of an electron polaron. The polaron
localizes at one Fe cation, which acquires a charge state of 2+. For
Ti substitution in layers C1, C2, and C3, the polaron preferentially
localizes on an Fe atom in the topmost cation layer C1. Ti substitution
in layers C4 and C5 causes the polaron to localize in layers C3 and
C6, respectively. To address how the interaction between the dopant
and the polaron affects the formation energies given in Figure a, we calculated the same structures
with one electron artificially removed from the cell, thus removing
the polaron and its interaction with the dopant.[39] The energy gains with respect to substitution in layer
C5 are plotted in red in Figure a (Ti substitution in layer C5 was used as a reference
in this case as this layer is sufficiently far from the surface to
be considered bulklike; since the dopants have the same distances
in all slabs, this choice allows us to neglect charge corrections[40] other than the jellium automatically included
in the VASP code). The C2 layer is again preferred over neighboring
ones, but the energy differences are less pronounced than when the
polaron is present. Moreover, the substitution of isolated Ti atoms
in layer C5 appears slightly more favorable than in layers closer
to the surface when the polaron is removed. Therefore, we attribute
most of the energy difference between C2 and the deeper layers to
the dopant–polaron interaction.
Ti-Induced
Surface Modifications
We also considered how two (or more)
Ti atoms interact and thus preferentially
arrange in the system. Rather than staying isolated, two Ti atoms
in a (2 × 2) surface slab pair in the C2 layer along the [11̅01̅]
direction such that they share an O-bonding partner in the A3 layer.
This results in an energy gain of 0.08 eV, i.e., 0.04 eV per Ti. The
best arrangement for two Ti atoms per (2 × 1) supercell (twice
the amount of Ti) is shown in Figures b and 6b and labeled in the following as (1 × 1)Ti. It is
the most favorable arrangement of near-surface Ti, with 0.08 eV energy
gain per Ti atom relative to isolated Ti in a C2 site, if one allows
only cation substitutions without further modifying the composition.
It consists of an infinite zigzag chain of Ti atoms in the C2 layer
running along the [11̅01̅] direction, in which each Ti
shares both of its O-bonding partners in layer A3 with a neighboring
Ti. The top layer appears as a structurally unmodified (1 × 1).
The calculated spin magnetic moments suggest that the surface Fe atoms
directly above the Ti rows take on an Fe2+ charge state
(3.5 μB), while all other iron atoms remain
Fe3+ (4 μB).[41] Further increasing the Ti concentration and substituting every Fe
in layer C2 by Ti do not cause extra energy gain or energy cost.Surface
phase diagram and structures of Ti-doped Fe2O3(11̅02) as a function of μODFT. (a) Formation energies per
Ti atom and per (1 × 1) unit cell of trench structures with different
spacings, relative to surfaces with the same amount of Ti doping in
the subsurface, but without trenches, i.e., a combination of undoped
(1 × 1) and the (1 × 1)Ti structure of panel
(b) (see Section for details). The inset shows the region around μODFT = −2.3
eV in greater detail. (b) Perspective view of the (1 × 1)Ti structure with two Ti atoms per (2 × 1) unit cell.
(c, d) Perspective views of trenches indefinitely extended along the
[11̅01̅] direction, with a periodicity of two and four
unit cells along the [112̅0] direction, respectively; (e–g)
short trenches with and without one additional oxygen vacancy (VO) per supercell. The dimensions of the supercells are indicated
in the panels.When modifications in the composition
are allowed, another structure
is more favorable than the (1 × 1)Ti surface at some
values of μODFT. This is shown in Figures c and 6c. We call it trench
reconstruction. The trenches are formed in the surface layers as a
result of removing two Fe and two O atoms per (2 × 1) unit cell
from the C1 and A1 layers, respectively. Because of this modification,
the remaining surface Fe returns to a 3+ charge state, while Ti remains
4+ (see Figure c).
We note that the concentration of Ti discussed here, i.e., two atoms
per (2 × 1) unit cell all over the surface, is well above what
is experimentally achieved with our doped films. For smaller concentrations,
the trench spacing along [112̅0] can be expanded (see, for example, Figure d) and/or short trench
structures can be constructed by breaking the periodicity along [11̅01̅]. Figure e–g shows
a few examples (an additional oxygen atom per unit cell is missing
in the structures of panels f and g).Figure a shows
the differences in the formation energies of these reconstructions
as a function of μODFT, normalized to the supercell area and the number of Ti
atoms. As detailed in Section , it plots the normalized differences Δϕ
in the grand potentials of each structure and its reference, taken
as a surface with the same amount of Ti doping in the subsurface but
without trenches. Overall, DFT predicts the Ti-induced trench defects
to be stable over a wide range of oxygen chemical potentials. The
infinite trenches (solid black and gray lines, perspective views in Figure c,d) are more stable
than the (1 × 1)-terminated surface (red line, perspective view
in Figure b) when
μODFT ≳
−2.3 eV. The spacing between the trenches does not play a major
role: the black and gray lines are degenerate within the accuracy
of DFT. Similarly, we observe that the spacing between the trenches
along [112̅0] is irrelevant for the short trenches. As can be
seen from the dotted line in Figure a (structure in Figure e), shortening the trench along [11̅01̅]
results in a significant energy cost, associated with a 2-fold coordinated
O atom at one end of the trench (highlighted by a red circle in Figure e). The short trenches
can compete with the infinite ones when this 2-fold coordinated O
atom is removed from the trench edge (see Figure f,g and the corresponding dashed lines in
the phase diagram): in the μODFT region between −2.4 and −2.3
eV, the short trenches with one additional oxygen vacancy are slightly
preferred. Removing this weakly bound O atom results in an overall
slightly more reduced stoichiometry, with the excess charge forming
one Fe2+ at each end of the trench defect (Figure f,g). One can eliminate these
polarons by removing two additional FeO units at the trench ends of
this structure (not shown). The formation energy of this structure
is degenerate with the one of Figure e and, thus, unfavorable (not shown).
Experimental vs Simulated STM Images
High-resolution
STM images of the trench defects imaging filled and
empty states are shown in Figure , together with the superimposed STM simulations from
the model of the Ti-induced trench (Figure d). Both the simulated and the experimental
filled-state images (negative sample bias, Figure a), where oxygen appears bright,[17] show that the missing zigzag row of oxygen in
the topmost layer (referred to as A1 in Figure c) appears as a dark line. The match between
theory and experiment is further supported by comparing experimental
and simulated empty-state images (positive sample bias, Figure b): at these conditions, the
STM tip images the unsaturated dangling bonds of Fe, which are slightly
tilted away from their topmost O neighbors.[17] In the presence of a trench, two Fe zigzag rows are replaced by
a dark area lined by isolated point features on both sides. The dark
area relates to the missing iron atoms in the topmost layer (C1, see Figure c), while the
isolated points are the remains of the two zigzag rows affected by
the removal of Fe cations.
Figure 7
Experimental (main panels) and simulated (insets)
STM images of
the Ti-modified (1 × 1) surface of Fe2O3(11̅02). At negative sample bias (a), the surface reconstruction
appears as a missing zigzag row of O atoms in the topmost layer along
the [11̅01̅] direction. At positive sample bias (b), two
Fe rows are missing from the top cation layer and are imaged as a
dark area surrounded on both sides by isolated point features. The
experimental STM images qualitatively match with those simulated assuming
the trench defect model. The STM simulations were performed at a constant
height (3 Å above the surface) on a (6 × 1) supercell,
with Usample = −2 and +2 V
in (a) and (b), respectively. The STM images are 9 × 9 nm2.
Experimental (main panels) and simulated (insets)
STM images of
the Ti-modified (1 × 1) surface of Fe2O3(11̅02). At negative sample bias (a), the surface reconstruction
appears as a missing zigzag row of O atoms in the topmost layer along
the [11̅01̅] direction. At positive sample bias (b), two
Fe rows are missing from the top cation layer and are imaged as a
dark area surrounded on both sides by isolated point features. The
experimental STM images qualitatively match with those simulated assuming
the trench defect model. The STM simulations were performed at a constant
height (3 Å above the surface) on a (6 × 1) supercell,
with Usample = −2 and +2 V
in (a) and (b), respectively. The STM images are 9 × 9 nm2.It is worth noting that the local
corrugation of the surface is
not uniform (this effect is especially evident at negative bias, Figure a, see the white
circle): atoms close to the trench appear brighter, as do some atoms
within the structurally unmodified (1 × 1) areas. A modulation
in the apparent height of the surface atoms is also visible in Figure b2. As
we discuss in Section S5, the long-range
modulation of the apparent height of the surface is due to the Ti-induced
modification of the density of states for surface Fe and O atoms far
away from the trench itself.
Discussion
Consistent with previous studies on Fe2O3(0001),[7,15] we observe that Ti dopants in low concentration
(in our case, below 3.1 atom %) do not tend to agglomerate to form
titania phases in Fe2O3(11̅02). On the
contrary, the (2 × 1) surface of slightly reduced, undoped single
crystals is fully preserved, while the stoichiometric (1 × 1)
surface is only slightly modified by Ti substituting Fe (leading to
dark lines along the [11̅01̅] direction). In the following,
we will focus on the (1 × 1) surface and the observed Ti-induced
modifications.DFT suggests that Ti preferentially occupies
the first subsurface
layer (C2, see Figure a), independent of the Ti concentration or μODFT. This allows Ti to maintain
a sixfold coordination to oxygen and a charge state of 4+ (Figure b,c). Based on the
results of Figure a, we attribute the preference for the C2 layer over deeper layers
to the attractive interaction of the Ti-induced electron polaron (preferentially
localizing on an Fe atom of layer C1) with a neighboring Ti dopant.
Purely structural effects seem to play a minor role, as the energy
differences between layer C2 and deeper layers are only 0.02–0.04
eV when the polaron is removed. The preference for the C2 layer over
the immediate surface layer C1 is likely due to the different oxygen
affinities of the cations: Ti has a higher oxygen affinity than Fe
and will therefore maximize its coordination with O atoms. This is
possible if Ti occupies the subsurface layer C2, while it would be
fivefold coordinated if it replaced Fe in layer C1.
Structural
Model of Ti-Induced Trenches
Among the structures with subsurface
Ti, presented in Figures and 6, we propose the Ti-induced trench
structure, shown as infinitely
long trenches in Figures c and 6c,d and as short trenches in Figure f,g, as the best
model for the dark lines observed on the (1 × 1) surface of our
UHV-prepared films (Figure b,c). This structure is characterized by missing rows of surface
Fe and O and substitutional Ti in the subsurface. The charge of the
two missing Fe3+O2– units per unit cell
length is compensated by replacing two subsurface Fe3+ atoms
with Ti4+.Several facts support this assignment.
(i) First, the high-resolution STM images of the dark lines are in
excellent agreement with the STM simulations of the trench structure
(Figure ). (ii) Moreover,
deposition of Ti on a pristine (1 × 1) surface causes the formation
of not only dark lines but also hematite islands, as seen in Figure . The hematite islands
likely consist of oxygen from the gas phase and Fe atoms displaced
as a result of both the substitutional Ti and the formation of the
trenches. (iii) Finally, the predictions of the theoretical phase
diagram of Figure are qualitatively confirmed experimentally. On the 3.1 atom %-doped
film, we observe long, at times bunched, trenches that are well modeled
by the infinite trench structures of Figure c,d. These are predicted to be preferred
at all experimentally accessible values of oxygen chemical potentials
at 550 °C (this temperature was chosen because Ti diffusion is
largely inhibited;[42−44] see Section S2): at the
lower limit of O2 partial pressure of ∼1 ×
10–13 mbar and at 550 °C, μOexp = −2.19
eV, which is higher than the theoretical threshold for the trench
formation of μODFT = −2.3 eV. (In practice, since equilibrium at these
low partial pressures will not be reached in a reasonable time, the
smallest experimentally accessible value of μOexp is even larger.) Consistently,
the coverage of dark lines on the 3.1 atom %-doped film does
not change upon annealing over the accessible range of oxygen chemical
potentials. (We varied μOexp from −1.80 to −1.25 eV by
annealing at 550 °C for 20 min at oxygen pressures ranging from
7 × 10–9 to 3 × 10–2 mbar.) On the low-doped film (0.8 atom %), the defects are shorter
and sparser because of the smaller doping level, and their coverage
decreases when annealing at μOexp ≤ −1.55 eV (Figure ). We interpret this transition
as the evolution to the defect-free (1 × 1)Ti surface
from the trench structure. Note that the content of Ti in layer C2
stays unchanged, as suggested by the saturation of the coverage of
line defects after a few minutes of annealing (Figure ) and the fact that at the annealing temperature
of 550 °C bulk diffusion of Ti is inhibited (see Section S2). Hence, the transition essentially
consists of filling up the trenches by Fe and O (Fe atoms likely come
from steps, as Fe diffusion in the bulk is inhibited at 550 °C,[42−44] while O is taken from the sample or the gas phase). This behavior
is qualitatively in line with the prediction of DFT that the (1 ×
1)Ti surface can be stabilized upon crossing a certain
threshold of μODFT (see the inset of Figure a, μODFT ≤ −2.4 eV). For the smaller
doping level, we refrain from quantitative comparisons between theory
and experiments because (i) the smallest concentration of dopants
achievable with DFT with acceptable computational efforts is significantly
larger than the experimental one; (ii) kinetic limitations are not
considered: these could limit the agglomeration of short trenches
into infinite ones; and (iii) entropic contributions (including, e.g.,
mixing terms) are also not taken into account in the DFT results and
could affect the relative formation energies in nontrivial ways.While for both infinite and short trenches, a 2× periodicity
in the [112̅0] direction is predicted to be degenerate with
a 4× periodicity, experiments may suggest a preference for the
2×, especially in the vicinity of steps. In fact, a local (2
× 1) periodicity is observed when sufficiently large amounts
of Ti (around 0.1–0.2 ML) are deposited on an Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1 × 1) surface, followed by oxygen
annealing (see, for example, some of the islands in Figure ). The full (2 × 1)-periodic
ordering of the Ti-induced trenches was not observed on the as-grown
films because the amount of near-surface Ti in our films is not sufficient
to produce this superstructure. This full coverage can, however, be
obtained by depositing Ti amounts around and above 0.5 ML. In Section S7, we show that the corresponding STM
images are in good agreement with those simulated from the trench
model with (2 × 1) periodicity. This further supports our assignment
of the trench structure model for the observed defects.
Experimental Route for Mechanistic Insights
into the Photocatalysis of Ti-Doped Hematite
During photocatalytic
reactions, charge carriers generated by absorbed light are transferred
to adsorbed molecules that react at the surface. The overall reactivity
of the photocatalyst is determined by the combination of several factors:
First, the efficiency of light absorption and charge migration to
the surface, which are influenced by the bulk electronic structure
and conductivity (e.g., critical factors are recombination centers
or charge traps in the bulk). Second, the local electronic structure
of the surface, which establishes how efficiently charge carriers
are exchanged between the reactants and the catalyst.[4] Finally, the specific arrangement and the coordination
of the topmost atoms, defining which sites are available and preferred
for adsorption, dissociation, and reaction.[2,13,45−48] Although the specific reaction
pathways are defined by the electronic and geometric details of the
surface, their role is often overlooked. This is partly because photoelectrochemical
current–voltage measurements, commonly used to quantify the
overall efficiency of a photocatalyst, lack the ability of isolating
these factors. When dopants are introduced in the system and cause
an increase in its photocatalytic activity, it is even harder to pinpoint
the exact cause, as the foreign elements will affect all of the above
ingredients.Our Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02)
system should be suited to address these effects one by one. The Ti
dopants introduce excess electron carriers in the bulk, which affect
the electrical conductivity. Ti also modifies the local surface electronic
structure (Section S5): the distribution
of states is altered far from the trench, and, in its proximity, a
new in-gap state appears close to the valence band maximum. These
may modify the adsorption energy of molecules, the localization of
charge carriers, and the effectiveness of charge transfer to adsorbates.
Finally, the Ti-induced modification in the surface atomic structure
(trenches) makes new atoms available as possible reaction sites [Fe
in layer C2, O in layer A3, not accessible on the undoped Fe2O3(11̅02)-(1 × 1) surface] and changes the
local coordination of others (the O atoms in layer A2 at the trench
edge become 3-fold coordinated). All of these effects are expected
to influence reactions. In the following, we propose an experimental
route to disentangle the roles of the efficiency of charge transport
in the bulk and of surface electronic and atomic structures in the
photocatalytic activity of our model system. To this end, for each
factor, we identify suitable descriptors that can be quantified experimentally.
To describe the effect of Ti on the surface atomic structure, we use
the coverage of trenches θ (expressed as the fraction of surface
unit cells composing trenches), which can be measured by STM or other
scanning probe techniques. For quantifying the Ti-induced changes
on the surface electronic structure, we define the near-surface concentration
of the dopants. This quantity affects both the local density of states
of Fe and O atoms potentially available as reaction sites and the
availability of electrons directly accessible to adsorbed molecules.
Consistent with our definition of the bulk doping in atomic percent,
we define “surface” doping as cTis = nTi/(nTi + nFe), where nTi and nFe are the total numbers of Ti and Fe cations
in layers C1 and C2. At oxidizing conditions, all available subsurface
Ti atoms produce trenches with coverage θ. It can be derived
that the surface doping equals cTis = θ/(2 – θ)
at these conditions (see Section S6). Hence,
the surface doping levels of the 0.8- and 3.1 atom %-doped films correspond
to 2.06 ± 0.24 and 10.1 ± 0.7%, respectively (as derived
from the corresponding θ values; see Section ). The ratio between these surface doping
levels is 4.93 ± 0.67, close to the ratio of the bulk doping
levels of the two films. Note also that the surface doping levels
are approximately 3 times larger than the nominal bulk doping levels.
This is likely due to the strong preference of Ti to occupy the C2
layer over the neighboring ones: C2 acts as a “potential well”
(Figure a), attracting
some Ti atoms from deeper layers. Finally, one can use the bulk conductivity
as a measure of the efficiency of charge separation.[8]In Table , we summarize
how these descriptors (columns) are affected by three independent
experimental “handles” (rows), i.e., the oxygen chemical
potential, the amount of Ti deposited after growth, and the bulk doping.
Table 1
Dependence of Intrinsic Properties
of Ti:Fe2O3(11̅02) Model Surfaces on Some
Experimental Parameters
experimental
parameter
trench coverage
surface doping
bulk conductivity
oxygen chemical potential, μO
f(μO)
amount of Ti deposited after growth, θTi
θTia
θTi/(2 – θTi)
bulk doping, cTib
6cTib a
3cTib/(1 – 3cTib)
f(cTib)
At large enough Ti amounts and/or
μO.
At large enough Ti amounts and/or
μO.• Oxygen Chemical Potential. As discussed
above, μO can influence the coverage
of trenches at the surface. However, the surface doping is not affected
because the amount of both subsurface Ti and near-surface Fe stays
unchanged when trenches are formed (recall that bulk diffusion of
both Ti and Fe is inhibited at the temperatures used; see Sections and S2). In the range of temperatures and oxygen
pressures employed, the bulk conductivity is also not affected.[49]• Amount of Ti Deposited after Growth. Deposition of controlled
amounts of Ti by PLD or MBE affects the
coverage of trenches θ and the surface doping but not the bulk
conductivity. θ can be expressed as a function of the amount
of Ti deposited in monolayers, θTi. A total of 0.5
ML of Ti, i.e., one Ti atom per (1 × 1) unit cell or two Ti atoms
per (2 × 1) unit cell, corresponds to the highest trench coverage
of 50% (Figures b
and 6c), i.e., two Fe atoms missing per (2
× 1) unit cell or θ = 0.5 ML. Hence, θ = θTi (up to the 0.5 ML saturation coverage of trenches). The
surface doping changes according to its relation with θ.• Bulk Doping. A
change in the
bulk doping, i.e., the concentration of Ti dopants in the bulk, cTib, tunes the bulk conductivity
and the coverage of trenches θ: our STM evaluations reveal that
θ is ≈6 times larger than the bulk doping (for low Ti
concentrations, this is valid at oxidizing conditions only). The change
in θ translates in a modification of the surface doping.To gain insights into the role of dopants
in reactivity,
one would prepare several samples with different values of bulk doping
(cTib) and evaluate how the reactivity changes with cTib. Most often,
however, this dependence will be a combination of the three relations
in the last row of Table , as a result of the entanglement of the factors in the top
row of Table . With
the two additional “handles” identified here (θTi and μO), one can modify the coverage of
trenches and/or surface doping of the samples by either depositing
Ti after growth or using μO. The contributions of
trenches and surface doping can then be isolated by comparing the
experimental dependencies of the reactivity on θTi and μO with the relations in Table . After the critical factors are identified,
further atomic-scale investigations, supported by theoretical calculations
based on the structural models established here, can be used to shed
light on the reaction pathways and mechanisms of interest.
Conclusions
In our combined PLD/surface science
setup, we have grown high-quality,
epitaxial Ti-doped α-Fe2O3(11̅02)
films, which are atomically flat and can be imaged with STM after
standard UHV preparation. At doping levels up to at least 3.1 atom %,
the native surface reconstructions of undoped Fe2O3 are largely preserved, except for local trench defects that
are induced by the Ti dopants, for which we provide DFT-based modeling.
Combining this model with experimental observations, we suggest a
route to isolate the effects of the surface structure, the surface
doping, and the bulk doping on the photocatalytic water-splitting
performance of Ti-doped Fe2O3.
Authors: Florian Kraushofer; Lena Haager; Moritz Eder; Ali Rafsanjani-Abbasi; Zdeněk Jakub; Giada Franceschi; Michele Riva; Matthias Meier; Michael Schmid; Ulrike Diebold; Gareth S Parkinson Journal: ACS Energy Lett Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 23.101