Literature DB >> 32420226

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer.

Ahmed Yassin Hemida1, Omar M Said2, Asser A E Abdel-Meguid3, Mohammed Iqbal4, Amani E Badawi5.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a femtosecond laser for flap creation using ocular response analyzer (ORA) and Goldmann applanation tonometry, and to identify factors that may influence the preoperative and postoperative IOP.
METHODS: A prospective study conducted on myopic patients who underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser for flap fashioning. Enrolled patients were evaluated preoperatively, 6wk and 3mo postoperatively for manifest refraction (MR), keratometric (K) readings and central corneal thickness (CCT) using a scheimpflug-based topography. Corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal hysteresis (CH), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg) and corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc) were measured using ORA besides IOP assessment by Goldman applanation tonometry (GAT).
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant decrease in measures of IOPg by 3.35±0.83 mm Hg, followed by GAT which decreased by 2.2±0.44 mm Hg, and the least affected by operation was IOPcc which decreased only by 0.87±0.1 mm Hg after 6wk. After 3mo follow up there was a statistically significant decrease in IOPcc which decreased only by 0.76±0.4 mm Hg, followed by IOP GAT by 1.6±0.5 mm Hg, and the most affected by operation was IOPg which decreased by 2.3±0.3 mm Hg. Correspondingly, there was a statistically significant decrease in CH and CRF after 6wk and 3mo. At 3mo, the preoperative MR and preoperative GAT were prominent significant predictors of the postoperative GAT changes. The prediction equation was subsumed.
CONCLUSION: IOP measurements and corneal biomechanical factors reduce significantly after LASIK with a femtosecond laser for flap creation. The IOPcc values are less influenced by changes in corneal properties than IOPg and GAT, indicating that IOPcc may provide the most reliable measurement of IOP after this procedure. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corneal biomechanics; femtosecond laser; intraocular pressure; laser in situ keratomileusis; myopia; ocular response analyzer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420226      PMCID: PMC7201364          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.05.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  22 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure change after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis as measured on the central and peripheral cornea.

Authors:  Qi Fan; Jianhua Zhang; Lei Zheng; Huazhang Feng; Hongying Wang
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Causes of visual loss and their risk factors: an incidence summary from the Barbados Eye Studies.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Suh-Yuh Wu; Barbara Nemesure; Anselm Hennis
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2010-04

3.  Association between myopia and glaucoma in the United States population.

Authors:  Mary Qiu; Sophia Y Wang; Kuldev Singh; Shan C Lin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comparison of real-time intraocular pressure during laser in situ keratomileusis and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis in porcine eyes.

Authors:  José L Hernández-Verdejo; Laura de Benito-Llopis; Miguel A Teus
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.

Authors:  Hua Li; Yan Wang; Rui Dou; Pinghui Wei; Jiamei Zhang; Wei Zhao; Liuyang Li
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Biomechanical corneal changes induced by different flap thickness created by femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Fabricio W Medeiros; Abhijit Sinha-Roy; Milton R Alves; William J Dupps
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Comparison of Intraocular Pressure before and after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Refractive Surgery Measured with Perkins Tonometry, Noncontact Tonometry, and Transpalpebral Tonometry.

Authors:  Isabel Cacho; Juan Sanchez-Naves; Laura Batres; Jesús Pintor; Gonzalo Carracedo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Validity of Tono-pachymetry for Measuring Corrected Intraocular Pressure in Non-surgical and Post-photorefractive Keratectomy Eyes.

Authors:  In Kyun Hahn; Jae Yong Kim; Myoung Joon Kim; Hungwon Tchah; Chan Hee Moon
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-02

9.  Evaluation of femtosecond laser in flap and cap creation in corneal refractive surgery for myopia: a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mohamed Nagy Elmohamady; Walid Abdelghaffar; Ahmed Daifalla; Tamer Salem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Mohamed Hosny; Fayrouz Aboalazayem; Hoda El Shiwy; Mohsen Salem
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.