Literature DB >> 32420093

Comparison of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic stenosis at low-intermediate risk.

Mahin R Khan1, Waleed T Kayani2, Malalai Manan3, Ahmad Munir1, Ihab Hamzeh2, Salim S Virani2,4, Yochai Birnbaum2, Hani Jneid2,4, Mahboob Alam2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at low-intermediate risk, given the paucity of robust data.
METHODS: We performed an aggregate data meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6,778 patients comparing TAVR with SAVR for aortic stenosis (AS) in low-intermediate risk patients (Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk-score ≤8%) using the random-effects model. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30-day, 1-year and 2-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included cardiac-mortality, stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), atrial fibrillation (AF), permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, major-bleeding, moderate-severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) and rehospitalization.
RESULTS: All-cause mortality, cardiac-mortality and stroke were comparable between the two groups. AF was higher with SAVR at 30-day [odds ratio (OR) 0.17, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.12-0.24] thorough to 2-year (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.21-0.55), while PPM implantation was higher with TAVR (30-day: OR 3.31, 95% CI: 1.64-6.66, 2-year: OR 3.17, 95% CI: 1.02-9.86). Moderate-severe PVR was more prevalent with TAVR at all follow-ups. On inter-group comparison, patients in the low-risk group had an even lower risk of AF, but a higher risk of PPM implantation as compared to the patients in the intermediate-risk group undergoing TAVR.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to SAVR, TAVR had comparable all-cause mortality and stroke, lower-risk of AF, but was associated with a higher risk of PPM implantation and moderate-severe PVR in low-intermediate-risk patients. Thus, highlighting the need for longer-term follow-up before robust inferences are drawn. 2020 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); low-intermediate risk; surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420093      PMCID: PMC7225446          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2020.02.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  22 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Baseline Characteristics and Prognostic Implications of Pre-Existing and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Results From the FRANCE-2 Registry.

Authors:  Romain Chopard; Emmanuel Teiger; Nicolas Meneveau; Sidney Chocron; Martine Gilard; Marc Laskar; Hélène Eltchaninoff; Bernard Iung; Pascal Leprince; Karine Chevreul; Alain Prat; Michel Lievre; Alain Leguerrier; Patrick Donzeau-Gouge; Jean Fajadet; Gauthier Mouillet; Francois Schiele
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 3.  Impact of access on TAVI procedural and midterm follow-up: a meta-analysis of 13 studies and 10,468 patients.

Authors:  Federico Conrotto; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Giordana Francesca; Chiara Colaci; Paolo Sacciatella; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Claudio Moretti; Maurizio D'Amico; Fiorenzo Gaita; Sebastiano Marra
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Robert A Guyton; Patrick T O'Gara; Carlos E Ruiz; Nikolaos J Skubas; Paul Sorajja; Thoralf M Sundt; James D Thomas; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Mark A Creager; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Robert A Guyton; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; William G Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement or surgical aortic valve replacement for high surgical risk patients with aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Pamela S Douglas; William N Anderson; Eugene H Blackstone; Susheel K Kodali; Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Samir Kapadia; Joseph Bavaria; Rebecca T Hahn; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis Babaliaros; Augusto Pichard; Howard C Herrmann; David L Brown; Mathew Williams; Jodi Akin; Michael J Davidson; Lars G Svensson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Acute kidney injury post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Pradhum Ram; Kenechukwu Mezue; Gregg Pressman; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Current Key Issues in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Undergoing a Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  In-Chang Hwang; Kentaro Hayashida; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Five-Year Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes from the Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION) Randomized Clinical Trial in Lower Surgical Risk Patients.

Authors:  Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod; Nikolaj Ihlemann; Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen; Henrik Nissen; Bo Juel Kjeldsen; Petur Petursson; Yanping Chang; Olaf Walter Franzen; Thomas Engstrøm; Peter Clemmensen; Peter Bo Hansen; Lars Willy Andersen; Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel; Peter Skov Olsen; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantations and New-Onset Conduction Abnormalities With the SAPIEN 3 Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Authors:  Oliver Husser; Costanza Pellegrini; Thorsten Kessler; Christof Burgdorf; Hannah Thaller; N Patrick Mayr; Albert M Kasel; Adnan Kastrati; Heribert Schunkert; Christian Hengstenberg
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function.

Authors:  Marina Urena; John G Webb; Corrado Tamburino; Antonio J Muñoz-García; Asim Cheema; Antonio E Dager; Vicenç Serra; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Marco Barbanti; Sebastiano Immè; Juan H Alonso Briales; Luis Miguel Benitez; Hatim Al Lawati; Angela Maria Cucalon; Bruno García Del Blanco; Javier López; Eric Dumont; Robert Delarochellière; Henrique B Ribeiro; Luis Nombela-Franco; François Philippon; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Louise Swift; Thomas Puehler; Kate Misso; Shona Helen Lang; Carol Forbes; Jos Kleijnen; Marion Danner; Christian Kuhn; Assad Haneya; Hatim Seoudy; Jochen Cremer; Norbert Frey; Georg Lutter; Robert Wolff; Fueloep Scheibler; Kai Wehkamp; Derk Frank
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.