Literature DB >> 26847116

Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantations and New-Onset Conduction Abnormalities With the SAPIEN 3 Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Oliver Husser1, Costanza Pellegrini2, Thorsten Kessler2, Christof Burgdorf2, Hannah Thaller2, N Patrick Mayr3, Albert M Kasel2, Adnan Kastrati4, Heribert Schunkert4, Christian Hengstenberg4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the influence of implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing on conduction abnormalities (CA) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) implantation.
BACKGROUND: CA and PPIs are frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN 3). The potential underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood.
METHODS: Of 244 patients treated with SAPIEN 3,208 without a previous pacemaker and 184 without baseline CA were analyzed. We assessed the association of angiographic implantation depth (% of frame height below the annulus) and degree of oversizing with PPI and CA.
RESULTS: New PPI and new or worsened CA or PPI occurred in 16% (34 of 208) and 31% (57 of 184), respectively. Patients requiring PPI had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (44% vs. 24%; p = 0.017), complete right bundle branch block (27% vs. 5%; p = 0.001), and bradycardia (<60 beats/min, 38% vs. 21%; p = 0.034). In patients with new CA or PPI, implantation depth was lower (at septal side: 29 ± 8% vs. 25 ± 7%; p = 0.003), and rate of oversizing was higher (19% [11 of 57] vs. 6% [8 of 126]; p = 0.007). Independent predictors of new or worsened CA or PPI were implantation depth at septal side (odds ratio [OR]: 1.063 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.017 to 1.110]; p = 0.006 per % of frame below the aortic annulus), oversizing (OR: 3.489 [95% CI: 1.236 to 9.848]; p = 0.018), and QRS duration (OR: 1.033 [95% CI: 1.011 to 1.056]; p = 0.003 per ms).
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing were associated with a higher rate of new CA or PPI using the SAPIEN 3. Thus, avoidance of deep implantation and extreme oversizing may reduce these complications.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conduction abnormalities; permanent pacemaker implantation; predictors; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26847116     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  38 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comprehensive Review and Present Status.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; Jacob A Misenheimer; Radhakrishnan Ramaraj
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 2.  Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: why is this still happening?

Authors:  Stefan Toggweiler; Richard Kobza
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement-where are we?

Authors:  Sameer Arora; John P Vavalle
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  The Impact of Size and Position of a Mechanical Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Novel Insights Through Computational Modelling and Simulation.

Authors:  Giorgia Rocatello; Nahid El Faquir; Ole de Backer; Martin J Swaans; Azeem Latib; Luca Vicentini; Patrick Segers; Matthieu De Beule; Peter de Jaegere; Peter Mortier
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Permanent pacemaker insertion in patients with conduction abnormalities post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Amit Nanda; Samuel Latham; Issa Pour-Ghaz; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

6.  Cardiac Tamponade after Removal of a Temporary Pacing Wire for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ying-Hsiang Wang; Hung-Yen Ke; Cheng-Chung Cheng; Tzu-Chiao Lin; Chien-Sung Tsai; Chih-Yuan Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.672

7.  Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

Authors:  Birgid Gonska; Julia Seeger; Mirjam Keßler; Alexander von Keil; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Predictors of right ventricular pacing and pacemaker dependence in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

Authors:  Esseim Sharma; Antony F Chu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Comparison of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement for patients with aortic stenosis at low-intermediate risk.

Authors:  Mahin R Khan; Waleed T Kayani; Malalai Manan; Ahmad Munir; Ihab Hamzeh; Salim S Virani; Yochai Birnbaum; Hani Jneid; Mahboob Alam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

10.  Overcoming the transcatheter aortic valve replacement Achilles heel: conduction abnormalities-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Alperi; Guillem Muntané-Carol; Afonso B Freitas-Ferraz; Lucia Junquera; David Del Val; Laurent Faroux; François Philippon; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.