Oliver Husser1, Costanza Pellegrini2, Thorsten Kessler2, Christof Burgdorf2, Hannah Thaller2, N Patrick Mayr3, Albert M Kasel2, Adnan Kastrati4, Heribert Schunkert4, Christian Hengstenberg4. 1. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: oliver.husser@gmail.com. 2. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 3. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Institut für Anästhesiologie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 4. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz- und Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) e.V. (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the influence of implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing on conduction abnormalities (CA) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) implantation. BACKGROUND: CA and PPIs are frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN 3). The potential underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. METHODS: Of 244 patients treated with SAPIEN 3,208 without a previous pacemaker and 184 without baseline CA were analyzed. We assessed the association of angiographic implantation depth (% of frame height below the annulus) and degree of oversizing with PPI and CA. RESULTS: New PPI and new or worsened CA or PPI occurred in 16% (34 of 208) and 31% (57 of 184), respectively. Patients requiring PPI had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (44% vs. 24%; p = 0.017), complete right bundle branch block (27% vs. 5%; p = 0.001), and bradycardia (<60 beats/min, 38% vs. 21%; p = 0.034). In patients with new CA or PPI, implantation depth was lower (at septal side: 29 ± 8% vs. 25 ± 7%; p = 0.003), and rate of oversizing was higher (19% [11 of 57] vs. 6% [8 of 126]; p = 0.007). Independent predictors of new or worsened CA or PPI were implantation depth at septal side (odds ratio [OR]: 1.063 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.017 to 1.110]; p = 0.006 per % of frame below the aortic annulus), oversizing (OR: 3.489 [95% CI: 1.236 to 9.848]; p = 0.018), and QRS duration (OR: 1.033 [95% CI: 1.011 to 1.056]; p = 0.003 per ms). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing were associated with a higher rate of new CA or PPI using the SAPIEN 3. Thus, avoidance of deep implantation and extreme oversizing may reduce these complications.
OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the influence of implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing on conduction abnormalities (CA) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) implantation. BACKGROUND: CA and PPIs are frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN 3). The potential underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. METHODS: Of 244 patients treated with SAPIEN 3,208 without a previous pacemaker and 184 without baseline CA were analyzed. We assessed the association of angiographic implantation depth (% of frame height below the annulus) and degree of oversizing with PPI and CA. RESULTS: New PPI and new or worsened CA or PPI occurred in 16% (34 of 208) and 31% (57 of 184), respectively. Patients requiring PPI had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (44% vs. 24%; p = 0.017), complete right bundle branch block (27% vs. 5%; p = 0.001), and bradycardia (<60 beats/min, 38% vs. 21%; p = 0.034). In patients with new CA or PPI, implantation depth was lower (at septal side: 29 ± 8% vs. 25 ± 7%; p = 0.003), and rate of oversizing was higher (19% [11 of 57] vs. 6% [8 of 126]; p = 0.007). Independent predictors of new or worsened CA or PPI were implantation depth at septal side (odds ratio [OR]: 1.063 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.017 to 1.110]; p = 0.006 per % of frame below the aortic annulus), oversizing (OR: 3.489 [95% CI: 1.236 to 9.848]; p = 0.018), and QRS duration (OR: 1.033 [95% CI: 1.011 to 1.056]; p = 0.003 per ms). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing were associated with a higher rate of new CA or PPI using the SAPIEN 3. Thus, avoidance of deep implantation and extreme oversizing may reduce these complications.
Authors: Giorgia Rocatello; Nahid El Faquir; Ole de Backer; Martin J Swaans; Azeem Latib; Luca Vicentini; Patrick Segers; Matthieu De Beule; Peter de Jaegere; Peter Mortier Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Birgid Gonska; Julia Seeger; Mirjam Keßler; Alexander von Keil; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Alberto Alperi; Guillem Muntané-Carol; Afonso B Freitas-Ferraz; Lucia Junquera; David Del Val; Laurent Faroux; François Philippon; Josep Rodés-Cabau Journal: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-11