Literature DB >> 24370552

Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function.

Marina Urena1, John G Webb, Corrado Tamburino, Antonio J Muñoz-García, Asim Cheema, Antonio E Dager, Vicenç Serra, Ignacio J Amat-Santos, Marco Barbanti, Sebastiano Immè, Juan H Alonso Briales, Luis Miguel Benitez, Hatim Al Lawati, Angela Maria Cucalon, Bruno García Del Blanco, Javier López, Eric Dumont, Robert Delarochellière, Henrique B Ribeiro, Luis Nombela-Franco, François Philippon, Josep Rodés-Cabau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.30; P=0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.17; P=0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.30; P=0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.85; P=0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time (P=0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, -2.26; 95% confidence interval, -4.07 to -0.44; P=0.013; R(2)=0.121).
CONCLUSIONS: The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; aortic valve; death, sudden, cardiac; heart valves; pacemaker, artificial

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24370552     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  47 in total

1.  Rapid adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate- and high-risk patients to treat severe aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Sigitas Cesna; Ole De Backer; Lars Søndergaard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Head to head transcatheter heart valve comparisons: when theory becomes reality.

Authors:  Gabriela Tirado-Conte; German Armijo; Luis Nombela-Franco
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 4.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced left bundle branch block: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas T Poels; Patrick Houthuizen; Leen A F M Van Garsse; Jos G Maessen; Peter de Jaegere; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Deceleration capacity of heart rate predicts 1-year mortality of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Martin Duckheim; Charlotte Bensch; Linn Kittlitz; Nin Götz; Katharina Klee; Patrick Groga-Bada; Lars Mizera; Meinrad Gawaz; Christine Zuern; Christian Eick
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Impact of prior permanent pacemaker on long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Li; Wei-Wei Zhang; Xiao-Xiao Yang; Ning Li; Xing-Biao Qiu; Xin-Kai Qu; Wei-Yi Fang; Yi-Qing Yang; Ruo-Gu Li
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  The Lotus dilemma-respond to paravalvular leakage, but not answering pacemaker implantations?

Authors:  Costanza Pellegrini; Christian Hengstenberg; Oliver Husser
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Hammerstingl; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

Review 9.  Permanent pacemaker insertion in patients with conduction abnormalities post transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel; Amit Nanda; Samuel Latham; Issa Pour-Ghaz; William Paul Skelton; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

10.  Short-term pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Christiana Schernthaner; Johannes Kraus; Franz Danmayr; Matthias Hammerer; Jens Schneider; Uta C Hoppe; Bernhard Strohmer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.