Literature DB >> 7895014

The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception.

G Beckers1, S Zeki.   

Abstract

We studied the capacity of normal humans to discriminate the direction of motion of visual stimuli when areas V1 or V5 were reversibly inactivated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We found that (i) magnetic stimulation of V5 at intervals of -20 to +10 ms before or after the onset of visual stimulation was effective in abolishing motion perception--other delays were not; (ii) magnetic stimulation of V1 abolished motion perception only marginally and at delays which were significantly different from those obtained with V5, the stimulation now being effective only at delays of 60-70 ms after the onset of visual stimulation. We conclude (i) that stimulation of V5 is a much more potent way of inducing akinetopsia (motion imperception) than stimulation of V1; (ii) that perceptually effective visual motion signals reach V5 at or before 30 ms and reach V1 at or before 60 ms--consequently, perceptually effective motion signals reach V5 before they reach V1; (iii) that, given the time course of arrival of signals in V1 and V5, it takes about 30-50 ms for signals from V1 to reach V5. We conclude further that there are probably two components reaching V5 from the retina, a fast one which bypasses V1 and a slow one which reaches it through V1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7895014     DOI: 10.1093/brain/118.1.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  49 in total

Review 1.  The clinical and functional measurement of cortical (in)activity in the visual brain, with special reference to the two subdivisions (V4 and V4 alpha) of the human colour centre.

Authors:  S Zeki; A Bartels
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Bartres-Faz; J P Keenan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Motion opponency in visual cortex.

Authors:  D J Heeger; G M Boynton; J B Demb; E Seidemann; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modality-specific cognitive function of medial and lateral human Brodmann area 6.

Authors:  Satoshi Tanaka; Manabu Honda; Norihiro Sadato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

Review 6.  Visual field map clusters in human cortex.

Authors:  Brian A Wandell; Alyssa A Brewer; Robert F Dougherty
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The primary visual cortex, and feedback to it, are not necessary for conscious vision.

Authors:  Dominic H Ffytche; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over MT/MST fails to impair judgments of implied motion.

Authors:  James L Alford; Paul van Donkelaar; Paul Dassonville; Richard T Marrocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; Lisa Koski; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.