Literature DB >> 35344082

Depression, anxiety and stress in women with breech pregnancy compared to women with cephalic presentation-a cross-sectional study.

Madeleine Schauer1, Elisabetta Latartara1,2, Maria Alonso-Espias1,3, Emma Rossetti1,4, Pimrapat Gebert5,6, Wolfgang Henrich1, Larry Hinkson7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the level of psychological distress for women with breech compared to cephalic presentation. We hypothesized, that women with breech presentation have higher levels of depression, stress and anxiety. Secondary objectives were to analyze potential demographic risk factors and comorbidity of psychological distress in breech pregnancy.
METHODS: The breech study group was formed by 379 women with breech presentation. A sample of 128 women with cephalic presentation was recruited during routine clinical care. Depression, anxiety and stress symptoms were ascertained by means of the Depression-Anxiety-Stress-Score (DASS)-21 questionnaire. Categorial data was analyzed with Chi-square or exact test, continuous data with unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Demographic risk factors were identified using a binary logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Prevalence of psychological distress among women with breech was not higher compared to those of other pregnant women. Symptomatic depression, anxiety and stress affected 5.8%, 14.5% and 11.9% of women with breech, respectively. Decreasing age was identified as a risk factor for anxiety (p = 0.006). Multiparity increased risk for depression (p = 0.001), for anxiety (p = 0.026) and for perinatal stress (p = 0.010). More than 80% of women with depressive symptoms had comorbidities of psychological distress.
CONCLUSIONS: Breech presentation compared to cephalic presentation was not associated with higher levels of psychological distress. However, breech pregnancies are affected by symptoms of potential mental disorder. Multiparous women and younger women may need additional support and would benefit from a standardized screening tool for the assessment of perinatal psychological distress. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethical approval (EA2/241/18) was granted by the Ethics Commission of the Charité University Hospital on the 23.01.2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03827226).
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Breech; Depression; Stress

Year:  2022        PMID: 35344082     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06509-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  47 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of antenatal depression among women with high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ioannis Tsakiridis; Vasiliki Bousi; Themistoklis Dagklis; Chrysanthi Sardeli; Vasiliki Nikolopoulou; Georgios Papazisis
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study.

Authors:  Georg Macharey; Mika Gissler; Leena Rahkonen; Veli-Matti Ulander; Mervi Väisänen-Tommiska; Mika Nuutila; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  [Evoked potentials in the follow-up and prognosis of patients with craniocerebral trauma].

Authors:  J Zeitlhofer; M Steiner; E Zadrobilek; E Häusl; P Sporn; S Asenbaum; W Oder; C Baumgartner; L Deecke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice.

Authors:  Christine Dunkel Schetter; Lynlee Tanner
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  [Vaginal birth versus Cesarean section on demand - which mode of delivery is preferred by pregnant women?].

Authors:  F Hainer; I Kowalcek
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 0.685

Review 6.  Psychological science on pregnancy: stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and emerging research issues.

Authors:  Christine Dunkel Schetter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Prevalence, course, and risk factors for antenatal anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Antoinette M Lee; Siu Keung Lam; Stephanie Marie Sze Mun Lau; Catherine Shiu Yin Chong; Hang Wai Chui; Daniel Yee Tak Fong
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Breech Presentation: Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery, Which Intervention Leads to the Best Outcomes?

Authors:  Andreia Fonseca; Rita Silva; Inês Rato; Ana Raquel Neves; Carla Peixoto; Zita Ferraz; Inês Ramalho; Ana Carocha; Nisa Félix; Sandra Valdoleiros; Ana Galvão; Daniela Gonçalves; Joana Curado; Maria João Palma; Isabel Lobo Antunes; Nuno Clode; Luís Mendes Graça
Journal:  Acta Med Port       Date:  2017-06-30

9.  Predictors of mental health during pregnancy.

Authors:  Razieh Rezaee; Mahbobeh Framarzi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-02

10.  Preterm Birth, Low Gestational Age, Low Birth Weight, Parity, and Other Determinants of Breech Presentation: Results from a Large Retrospective Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Stefania Antonia Noli; Ilaria Baini; Fabio Parazzini; Paola Agnese Mauri; Michele Vignali; Sandro Gerli; Alessandro Favilli; Sonia Cipriani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.