| Literature DB >> 32408584 |
Amaia Iriondo-DeHond1, Ana Sofía Elizondo1, Maite Iriondo-DeHond2, Maria Belén Ríos1, Romina Mufari1,3, Jose A Mendiola1, Elena Ibañez1, Maria Dolores Del Castillo1.
Abstract
Our research aimed to evaluate the formation of Maillard reaction products in sun-dried coffee cascara and their impact on the safety and health promoting properties of a novel beverage called "Instant Cascara" (IC) derived from this coffee by-product. Maillard reaction products in sun-dried coffee cascara have never been reported. "Instant Cascara" (IC) extract was obtained by aqueous extraction and freeze-drying. Proteins, amino acids, lipids, fatty acid profile, sugars, fiber, minerals, and vitamins were analyzed for its nutritional characterization. Acrylamide and caffeine were used as chemical indicators of safety. Colored compounds, also called melanoidins, their stability under 40 °C and in light, and their in vitro antioxidant capacity were also studied. A safe instant beverage with antioxidant properties was obtained to which the following nutritional claims can be assigned: "low fat", "low sugar" "high fiber" and "source of potassium, magnesium and vitamin C". For the first time, cascara beverage color was attributed to the presence of antioxidant melanoidins (>10 kDa). IC is a potential sustainable alternative for instant coffee, with low caffeine and acrylamide levels and a healthy composition of nutrients and antioxidants.Entities:
Keywords: Maillard reaction; acrylamide; coffee cascara; food safety; instant beverage; melanoidins
Year: 2020 PMID: 32408584 PMCID: PMC7278827 DOI: 10.3390/foods9050620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Total protein (%) and free and total amino acid content (mg/g) of raw dry coffee cascara (CA) and powdered Instant Cascara beverage (IC).
| CA | IC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Protein (%) | 9.55 ± 0.11 b | 6.25 ± 0.27 a | ||
| Amino Acids (mg/g) | Free | Total | Free | Total |
| Aminobutyric acid (GABA) | N.D. | N.A. | 0.3 ± 0.00 | N.A. |
| Glutamic acid (Glu) | N.D. | 2.13 ± 0.04 a | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 2.11 ± 0.17 a |
| Alanine (Ala) | N.D. | 2.06 ± 0.11 a | 2.27 ± 0.01 | 2.44 ± 0.05 a |
| Arginine (Arg) | N.D. | 0.48 ± 0.03 a | 1.39 ± 0.02 | 1.05 ± 0.04 b |
| Asparagine (Asp) | N.D. | 2.84 ± 0.14 a | 1.91 ± 0.05 | 7.79 ± 0.37 b |
| Cysteine (Cis) | N.D. | 0.18 ± 0.00 a | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.22 ± 0.02 a |
| Phenylalanine (Phe) | N.D. | 0.98 ± 0.10 a | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.31 ± 0.01 a |
| Glycine (Gly) | N.D. | 2.71 ± 0.17 a | 0.30 ± 0.27 | 1.19 ± 0.04 a |
| Histidine (His) | N.D. | 0.52 ± 0.10 b | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 a |
| Isoleucine (Ile) | N.D. | 0.63 ± 0.05 b | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.18 ± 0.04 a |
| Leucine (Leu) | N.D. | 1.17 ± 0.03 b | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.04 a |
| Lysine (Lys) | N.D. | 0.38 ± 0.01 a | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 a |
| Methionine (Met) | N.D. | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | N.D. | 0.07 ± 0.04 a |
| Proline (Pro) | N.D. | 1.60 ± 0.01 a | 6.77 ± 0.02 | 4.82 ± 0.12 b |
| Serine (Ser) | N.D. | 1.91 ± 0.02 a | 5.71 ± 0.01 | 2.08 ± 0.05 a |
| Tyrosine (Tyr) | N.D. | 0.63 ± 0.05 a | N.D. | 0.68 ± 0.01 a |
| Tryptophan (Trp) | N.D. | N.A. | N.D. | N.A. |
| Threonine (Thr) | N.D. | 0.96 ± 0.03 b | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.02 a |
| Valine (Val) | N.D. | 1.27 ± 0.02 a | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.07 a |
| Totals (mg/g) | N.D. | 25.05 ± 0.16 a | 20.43 ± 0.37 | 29.78 ± 1.97 b |
| EAA (% total) | N.D. | 32.07 ± 0.07 b | 10.19 ± 0.01 | 13.04 ± 0.25 a |
| BCAA (Val + Leu + Ile) (% total) | N.D. | 14.83 ± 0.10 b | 1.92 ± 0.01 | 4.28 ± 0.14 a |
| AAA (Phe + Tyr + Trp) (% total) | N.D. | 7.77 ± 0.15 b | 0.8 ± 0.01 | 4.03 ± 0.00 a |
EAA, essential amino acids; BCAA, branched-chain amino acids; AAA, aromatic amino acids. N.D., not detected; N.A., not analyzed. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences for total protein and total amino acids (Student’s T, p < 0.05).
Total fat content (%) and fatty acid profile (g/100g) of raw dry coffee cascara (CA) and powdered Instant Cascara beverage (IC).
| CA | IC | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Fat (%) | 2.00 ± 0.50 b | 0.58 ± 0.18 a |
| Fatty Acid Profile (g/100 g) | ||
| C12:0 | 0.10 ± 0.02 a | N.D a |
| C14:0 | 1.18 ± 0.02 a | 5.77 ± 0.41 b |
| C15:0 | 0.37 ± 0.01 a | 4.02 ± 0.59 a |
| C16:0 | 36.02 ± 0.32 a | 30.54 ± 3.27 b |
| C16:1n7 | 3.04 ± 0.19 a | 3.90 ± 0.23 a |
| C17:0 | 0.56 ± 0.01 a | N.D b |
| C18:0 | 5.64 ± 0.22 a | 4.54 ± 0.37 a |
| C18:1n7c | 1.79 ± 0.05 a | N.D b |
| C18:1n9c | 6.72 ± 0.37 a | 10.82 ± 1.80 a |
| C18:2n6c | 21.80 ± 0.34 a | 15.83 ± 1.00 a |
| C18:3n3 | 17.37 ± 0.24 a | 14.84 ± 1.46 a |
| C20:0 | 2.82 ± 0.07 a | N.D a |
| C20:1n9 | 0.09 ± 0.00 a | N.D a |
| C20:2n6 | 0.09 ± 0.00 a | N.D a |
| C20:3n3 | 0.19 ± 0.04 a | N.D a |
| C20:5n3 | N.D a | N.D a |
| C21:0/C20:3n6 * | 0.10 ± 0.01 a | N.D a |
| C22:0 | 0.64 ± 0.04 a | N.D b |
| C22:6n3 | 0.76 ± 0.60 a | 9.74 ± 5.54 a |
| C23:0 | 0.16 ± 0.02 a | N.D a |
| C24:0/C22:5n3 * | 0.57 ± 0.00 a | N.D b |
| SFA (%) | 47.48 ± 0.10 a | 44.87 ± 4.65 a |
| MUFA (%) | 11.64 ± 0.12 a | 14.72 ± 1.57 a |
| PUFA (%) | 40.88 ± 0.02 a | 40.41 ± 3.08 a |
SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; N.D., not detected. The values indicate the mean ± SD. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (Student’s T. p < 0.05). * The chromatographic method does not allow the separation of the fatty acids C21:0 and C20:3n6; and C24:0 and C22:5n3, so the value obtained may be due to either one or the sum of both.
Nutrients (total carbohydrates (g/100 mL), glucose content (g/100 mL)) and non-nutrient antioxidants of the three beverages IC (4 mg/mL), IC (10 mg/mL) and Tabifruit.
| IC (4 mg/mL) | IC (10 mg/mL) | Tabifruit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nutrients | |||
| Total carbohydrates (g/100 mL) | 27.50 ± 0.07 b | 47.48 ± 0.20 c | 22.22 ± 0.06 a |
| Glucose (g/100 mL) | 0.04 ± 0.01 b | 0.05 ± 0.01 c | 0.02 ± 0.01 a |
| Antioxidants | |||
| Total phenolic content (mg eq. CGA/mL) | 0.25 ± 0.0 a | 0.89 ± 0.0 c | 0.37 ± 0.0 b |
| Anthocyanins | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
| ABTS (mg eq. CGA/mL) | 16.82 ± 0.9 b | 27.58 ± 2.3 c | 15.05 ± 0.6 a |
| FRAP (mg eq. CGA/mL) | 0.15 ± 0.0 a | 0.43 ± 0.0 c | 0.34 ± 0.0 b |
CGA, chlorogenic acid. Each value represents the mean ± SD. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between samples in the same row. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences between samples (Tukey Test, p < 0.05).
Antioxidant capacity analyzed by ABTS (mg eq. CGA/mL) and FRAP (mg eq. CGA/mL) of the high molecular weight (HMW, >10 kDa) and low molecular weight (LMW, <10 kDa) fractions of beverages IC (4 mg/mL), IC (10 mg/mL) and Tabifruit separated by ultrafiltration.
| IC (4 mg/mL) | IC (10 mg/mL) | Tabifruit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMW | LMW | HMW | LMW | HMW | LMW | |
| ABTS | 61.25 ± 0.49 b | 0.92 ± 0.01 a | 82.85 ± 0.19 d | 0.92 ± 0.00 a | 66.68 ± 0.48 c | 0.93 ± 0.00 a |
| FRAP | 0.61 ± 0.08 b | 0.12 ± 0.00 a | 1.08 ± 0.02 d | 0.25 ± 0.01 a | 0.90 ± 0.09 c | 0.14 ± 0.00 a |
Values indicate the mean ± standard deviation and different superscript letters denote significant differences between each row (Tukey Test. p < 0.05).
Figure 1Photosensitivity and heat resistance of IC at 4 mg/mL, IC at 10 mg/mL and Tabifruit. (A) Color differences (colorizer.org as a tool for color generation [34]); (B) pH; (C) Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) determined by ABTS; (D) Total phenolic content (TPC). Bars represent the mean values and the error bars denote the standard deviation. Different letters on bars indicate significant differences in each beverage sample (Tukey Test, p < 0.05).