| Literature DB >> 32825719 |
Amaia Iriondo-DeHond1, Maite Iriondo-DeHond2, María Dolores Del Castillo1.
Abstract
To obtain the coffee beverage, approximately 90% of the edible parts of the coffee cherry are discarded as agricultural waste or by-products (cascara or husk, parchment, mucilage, silverskin and spent coffee grounds). These by-products are a potential source of nutrients and non-nutrient health-promoting compounds, which can be used as a whole ingredient or as an enriched extract of a specific compound. The chemical composition of by-products also determines food safety of the novel ingredients. To ensure the food safety of coffee by-products to be used as novel ingredients for the general consumer population, pesticides, mycotoxins, acrylamide and gluten must be analyzed. According with the priorities proposed by the Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) to maximize the benefit for the environment, society and economy, food waste generation should be avoided in the first place. In this context, the valorization of food waste can be carried out through an integrated bio-refinery approach to produce nutrients and bioactive molecules for pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food and non-food applications. The present research is an updated literature review of the definition of coffee by-products, their composition, safety and those food applications which have been proposed or made commercially available to date based on their chemical composition.Entities:
Keywords: coffee by-products; food applications; health-promoting compounds; market products; nutrients; safety; sustainability
Year: 2020 PMID: 32825719 PMCID: PMC7564712 DOI: 10.3390/biom10091219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Identification of coffee by-products in the coffee cherry anatomy.
Figure 2Dry (top) and wet (bottom) processing of coffee cherries. Photographs were taken in Combrifol and Café Orgánico Marcala S.A. (COMSA), Marcala, Honduras.
Origin, type of processing, processing step and the nutritional and bioactive compound composition of coffee by-products. Data are expressed in% of dry matter.
| By-Product | Cascara | Mucilage | Parchment | Silverskin | Spent Coffee Grounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Origin | Producing countries | Producing countries | Producing countries | Worldwide | Worldwide |
| Type of processing | Dry/wet | Wet | Wet | Dry/wet | Dry/wet |
| Processing step | Pulping | Fermentation | Hulling | Roasting | Brewing |
| Kg by-product/100 kg cherry */bean ** | 39–45 * | 22 * | 39 * | 2.08 ** | 65 ** |
|
| |||||
| Carbohydrates (%) | 45–89 | 45.8 | 0.45 | 44 | 82 |
| Total fiber (%) | 18–32 | 0.9 | 89–91 | 62.4 | 60.5 |
| Lipids (%) | 0.5–3 | 0.12 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 10–29 |
| Protein (%) | 4–12 | 0.93 | 0.4 | 16.2–18.6 | 13.6–16.9 |
| Protein energy value (%) | 9.4 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 18.8 | 11.1 |
|
| |||||
| Ash (%) | 3–10 | 0.43 | 0.5–1 | 5–7 | 1.3–1.6 |
| Magnesium (mg/100 g) | 20.8–420 | 88 | 49 | 2002 | 220.1 |
| Sodium | 100–266.6 | - | - | 5.32 | 20.1 |
| Potassium (mg/100 g) | 2284–2460 | 1282 | 11 | 4977 | 882.4 |
| Calcium | 54.8–554 | 370 | 190 | 584 | 34.9 |
| Iron | 4.3–15 | 30.2 | 3.3 | 41.8 | 4.6 |
| Vitamin C (mg/100 g) | 69.8 | - | - | 110 | - |
|
| |||||
| Tannins (%) | 1.8–9.3 | - | - | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Caffeine (%) | 1.2 | - | 0.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| CGAs (%) | 10.7–12.6 | - | - | 15.8 | 11.5 |
| Melanoidins (%) | 15 | - | - | 17–23 | 13–25 |
|
| [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
Figure 3The food hierarchy proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, 2019). FLW, Food losses and waste.
Nutrition claims and health-promoting properties of coffee by-products associated with their composition that is shown in Table 1.
| By-Product | Nutrition Claims 1 | Health-Promoting Properties |
|---|---|---|
| Cascara | High in fiber 2 | Anti-diabetic [ |
| Mucilage | Low in fat | Antioxidant [ |
| Parchment | High in fiber | Hypoglycemic [ |
| Silverskin | High in fiber | Prebiotic [ |
| Spent coffee grounds | High in fiber | Prebiotic [ |
1 “Any claim which states, suggests or implies that a food has particular beneficial nutritional properties due to the energy (calorific value) it provides or does not provide; or to the nutrients or other substances it contains or does not contain” [52]. 2 A claim that a food is high in fiber may only be made where the product contains at least 6 g of fiber per 100 g. 3 A claim that a food is low in fat may only be made where the product contains no more than 3 g of fat per 100 g for solids. 4 A claim that a food is a source of vitamins and/or minerals may only be made where the product contains at least 15% of the recommended allowance per 100 g of product. (Recommended daily allowances (RDAs) for potassium, magnesium, calcium and vitamin C are 3.5 g, 300 mg, 800 mg and 60 mg, respectively) (See Table S1). 5 A claim that a food is a source of protein may only be made where at least 12% of the energy value of the food is provided by protein [53].
Figure 4(A) Powdered Instant Cascara. (B) Coffee cascara extract and inulin yogurts. (C) Wheat bread slice. (D) Gluten-free bread containing cascara extract. (E) Gluten-free bread enriched in cascara dietary fiber. Novel foods were developed by the Food Bioscience Research Group at the Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, UAM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Figure 5(A) Novel beverages from Arabica and Robusta CSE. (B) Wheat bread slice. (C) Gluten-free bread with CSE. (D) Biscuits with CSE. Novel foods were developed by the Food Bioscience Research Group at the Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, UAM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Figure 6Biscuits containing SCGs developed by the Food Bioscience Research Group at the Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Alimentación (CIAL, UAM-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.