| Literature DB >> 32403309 |
Paula Monllor1, Gema Romero1, Raquel Muelas1, Carlos A Sandoval-Castro2, Esther Sendra1, José Ramón Díaz1.
Abstract
Wastes from artichoke and broccoli crops and cannery industries represent an environmental problem. A viable option to this problem is ensiling them for use as ruminants feed. The aim of this study was to characterise the ensiling process of broccoli and artichoke by-products and assess their suitability to be part of the ruminant diet, as well their minimum shelf life. Twenty-one commercial round bale silos (300 kg and 0.64 m3) of each by-product were made. Samples were analysed at days 0, 7, 15, 30, 60, and 200 to determine microbial populations, fermentation metabolites, nutritional components, and phytosanitary residues. Feedstuffs showed good suitability for ensiling, and stabilisation was achieved on day 30. The variables with the greatest significant differences among sampling times were microbial populations and fermentative components. There were no important dry matter losses, and some significant differences were observed in the nutritional composition, especially in crude protein and fibrous fractions, but they were not relevant for the loss of nutritional quality of silages. The phytosanitary residues determined on day 200 were below the maximum residue limits set by European legislation. So, ensiling these by-products in commercial round bale silos is a suitable and profitable technique that allows their preservation for a long time (200 days).Entities:
Keywords: Silage; alternative feeds; feedstuff; nutritive value; ruminant feeding
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403309 PMCID: PMC7278401 DOI: 10.3390/ani10050831
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Ensiling process of the three by-products studied.
Figure 2Effect of ensiling on microbial populations in broccoli by-product (a), artichoke by-product (b) and artichoke plant stubble (c) silages.
Figure 3Effect of ensiling on Flieg scores and pH in broccoli by-product (a), artichoke by-product (b) and artichoke plant stubble (c) silages.
Effect of ensiling on nutritional composition, in vitro dry matter digestibility and total polyphenols content in broccoli by-product (BB), artichoke by-product (AB) and artichoke plant stubble (APS) silages.
| Silage | Days of Ensiling | SEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 60 | 200 | |||
| Dry matter (g/kg) | ||||||||||
| BB | 174bc | 184ab | 172bc | 197ab | 173bc | 142d | 181ab | 154cd | 6.79 | *** |
| AB | 256a | 220b | 203bcd | 201bcd | 207bc | 183d | 192cd | 190cd | 8.66 | *** |
| APS | 283abc | 291abc | 273cd | 286abc | 268d | 277bcd | 271cd | 258e | 4.21 | *** |
| Organic matter (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 849a | 840a | 826b | 828b | 821b | 3.5 | *** | |||
| AB | 912 | 927 | 912 | 912 | 916 | 9.4 | n.s. | |||
| APS | 839b | 849a | 837b | 833bc | 828c | 2.3 | *** | |||
| Ether extract (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 20.2b | 23.4b | 29.1a | 23.2b | 32.1a | 1.97 | ** | |||
| AB | 19.6 | 29.3 | 25.8 | 28,0 | 29.6 | 3.41 | n.s. | |||
| APS | 26.3b | 31.4ab | 35.7a | 34.7a | 34.6a | 2.22 | * | |||
| Crude protein (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 195a | 199a | 204a | 153c | 174b | 4.6 | *** | |||
| AB | 117b | 126b | 125b | 122b | 145a | 3.7 | *** | |||
| APS | 78.7a | 78.3a | 67.1b | 76.9a | 78.1a | 1.2 | *** | |||
| Neutral detergent fibre (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 395ab | 356bc | 311d | 342cd | 430a | 11.7 | *** | |||
| AB | 589a | 530ab | 510b | 541ab | 528ab | 17.1 | * | |||
| APS | 547ab | 555ab | 540b | 532b | 571a | 9.9 | ** | |||
| Acid detergent fibre (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 272b | 266b | 233c | 259b | 326a | 8.2 | *** | |||
| AB | 398 | 359 | 353 | 379 | 354 | 13.3 | n.s. | |||
| APS | 358ab | 365a | 361a | 336b | 374a | 7.3 | *** | |||
| Acid detergent lignin (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 77.9a | 65.0b | 35.1c | 35.1c | 63.4b | 3.63 | *** | |||
| AB | 131a | 81b | 80b | 84b | 89b | 6.8 | *** | |||
| APS | 84.5bc | 87.1b | 91.9b | 77.1c | 107.9a | 2.67 | *** | |||
| BB | 888a | 829b | 857ab | 800b | 822b | 14.7 | ** | |||
| AB | 670b | 724ab | 723ab | 737ab | 769a | 23.2 | * | |||
| APS | 606b | 579c | 632a | 629ab | 615ab | 7.1 | *** | |||
| Total polyphenols (g/kg DM) | ||||||||||
| BB | 5.86c | 8.85a | 9.59a | 7.48b | 6.73ab | 0.308 | *** | |||
| AB | 1.96d | 7.60c | 10.08b | 15.29a | 7.56c | 0.734 | *** | |||
| APS | 5.02b | 5.47ab | 5.95a | 5.55ab | 4.96b | 0.240 | ** | |||
a–e Different letters in the same row indicate significant difference between days. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; n.s.: non significant.
Figure 4Effect of ensiling on sugar content and fermentative components in broccoli by-product (a), artichoke by-product (b) and artichoke plant stubble (c) silages.
Phytosanitary residues (mg/kg) in silages after 200 days of ensiling in round bales broccoli by-product (BB), artichoke by-product (AB) and artichoke plant stubble (APS) silages.
| Phytosanitary | Type | BB | AB | APS | MRL | Legislation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypermethrin | Insecticide | n.d. | n.d. | 0.240 | 2.00 | UE 520/2011 |
| Chlorpyrifos | Insecticide | n.d. | n.d. | 0.085 | 1.00 | CE 839/2008 |
| Imidacloprid | Insecticide | 0.023 | n.d. | 0.034 | 0.50 | UE 491/2014 |
| Miclobutanil | Fungicide | n.d. | 0.044 | 0.220 | 0.50 | UE 2016/567 |
| Spirotetramat | Insecticide | 0.053 | n.d. | n.d. | 1.00 | UE 2015/845 |
| Triadimefon | Fungicide | n.d. | n.d. | 0.700 | 1.00 | CE 459/2010 |
MRL: Maximum Residue Limit; n.d.: Not Detected.
Approximate manufacturing costs (€/t) of broccoli by-product (BB), artichoke by-product (AB) and artichoke plant stubble (APS) silages in 300 kg round bale silos on commercial scale.
| Costs | BB | AB | APS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw material | 4 | 10 | 5 |
| Inner netwrap and plastic film | 7.9 | 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Workforce, other production and marketing costs | 7.3 | 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Total (fresh matter) | 19.2 | 24.9 | 20.4 |
| Total (dry matter) | 125 | 131 | 79 |
| Total (€/kg CP) | 0.718 | 0.903 | 1.01 |
CP: crude protein.