Literature DB >> 27743669

Natural lactic acid bacteria population of tropical grasses and their fermentation factor analysis of silage prepared with cellulase and inoculant.

Waroon Khota1, Suradej Pholsen2, David Higgs3, Yimin Cai4.   

Abstract

Natural lactic acid bacteria (LAB) populations in tropical grasses and their fermentation characteristics on silage prepared with cellulase enzyme and LAB inoculants were studied. A commercial inoculant Lactobacillus plantarum Chikuso 1 (CH), a local selected strain Lactobacillus casei TH14 (TH14), and 2 cellulases, Acremonium cellulase (AC) and Maicelase (MC; Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), were used as additives to silage preparation with fresh and wilted (6 h) Guinea grass and Napier grass. Silage was prepared using a laboratory-scale fermentation system. Treatments were CH, TH14, AC at 0.01% fresh matter, AC 0.1%, MC 0.01%, MC 0.1%, CH+AC 0.01%, CH+AC 0.1%, CH+MC 0.01%, CH+MC 0.1%, TH14+AC 0.1%, TH14+AC 0.01%, TH14+MC 0.1%, and TH14+MC 0.01%. Microorganism counts of Guinea grass and Napier grass before ensiling were 102 LAB and 106 aerobic bacteria; these increased during wilting. Based on morphological and biochemical characteristics, and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, natural strains from both grasses were identified as L. plantarum, L. casei, Lactobacillus acidipiscis, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, Leuconostoc garlicum, Weissella confusa, and Lactococcus lactis. Lactobacillus plantarum and L. casei are the dominant species and could grow at lower pH and produce more lactic acid than the other isolates. Crude protein and neutral detergent fiber were 5.8 and 83.7% of dry matter (DM) for Guinea grass, and 7.5 and 77.1% of DM for Napier grass. Guinea grass had a low level of water-soluble carbohydrates (0.39% of DM). Guinea grass silage treated with cellulase had a lower pH and higher lactic acid content than control and LAB treatments. The 0.1% AC and MC treatments had the best result for fermentation quality. All high water-soluble carbohydrate (2.38% DM) Napier grass silages showed good fermentation quality. Compared with control and LAB-inoculated silage, the cellulase-treated silages had significantly higher crude protein content and lower neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber contents. The results confirmed that cellulase could improve tropical silage quality, inhibiting protein degradation and promoting fiber degradation.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cellulase; fermentation factor; lactic acid bacteria; tropical silage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27743669     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  17 in total

1.  Abundance and diversity of epiphytic microbiota on forage crops and their fermentation characteristic during the ensiling of sterile sudan grass.

Authors:  Mudasir Nazar; Siran Wang; Jie Zhao; Zhihao Dong; Junfeng Li; Niaz Ali Kaka; Tao Shao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Use of crude glycerine and microbial inoculants to improve the fermentation process of Tifton 85 haylages.

Authors:  Stéfane S Cunha; Marco A P Orrico Junior; Ricardo A Reis; Ana C A Orrico; Alice W Schwingel; Sirio D S Reis; Mabio S J Silva
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Influence of microbial additive on microbial populations, ensiling characteristics, and spoilage loss of delayed sealing silage of Napier grass.

Authors:  Yimin Cai; Zhumei Du; Seishi Yamasaki; Damiao Nguluve; Benedito Tinga; Felicidade Macome; Tetsuji Oya
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Community of natural lactic acid bacteria and silage fermentation of corn stover and sugarcane tops in Africa.

Authors:  Yimin Cai; Zhumei Du; Seishi Yamasaki; Damiao Nguluve; Benedito Tinga; Felicidade Macome; Tetsuji Oya
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Ensiling Process in Commercial Bales of Horticultural By-products from Artichoke and Broccoli.

Authors:  Paula Monllor; Gema Romero; Raquel Muelas; Carlos A Sandoval-Castro; Esther Sendra; José Ramón Díaz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Comparative Genomics of Lactobacillus acidipiscis ACA-DC 1533 Isolated From Traditional Greek Kopanisti Cheese Against Species Within the Lactobacillus salivarius Clade.

Authors:  Maria Kazou; Voula Alexandraki; Jochen Blom; Bruno Pot; Effie Tsakalidou; Konstantinos Papadimitriou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Comparative analysis of silage fermentation and in vitro digestibility of tropical grass prepared with Acremonium and Tricoderma species producing cellulases.

Authors:  Waroon Khota; Suradej Pholsen; David Higgs; Yimin Cai
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Effects of ferulic acid esterase-producing Lactobacillus fermentum and cellulase additives on the fermentation quality and microbial community of alfalfa silage.

Authors:  Rina Su; Kuikui Ni; Tianwei Wang; Xiaopan Yang; Jie Zhang; Yayong Liu; Weixiong Shi; Liu Yan; Chen Jie; Jin Zhong
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Microbial Community Dynamics and Natural Fermentation Profiles of Ensiled Alpine Grass Elymus nutans Prepared From Different Regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Zitong Ding; Jie Bai; Dongmei Xu; Fuhou Li; Yixin Zhang; Xusheng Guo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  The Microbiota Dynamics of Alfalfa Silage During Ensiling and After Air Exposure, and the Metabolomics After Air Exposure Are Affected by Lactobacillus casei and Cellulase Addition.

Authors:  Zongfu Hu; Huaxin Niu; Qing Tong; Jie Chang; Jianhua Yu; Shuguo Li; Shi Zhang; Deying Ma
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.