| Literature DB >> 32403221 |
Nikola Puvača1, Erinda Lika2, Vincenzo Tufarelli3, Vojislava Bursić4, Dragana Ljubojević Pelić5, Nedeljka Nikolova6, Aleksandra Petrović4, Radivoj Prodanović1, Gorica Vuković7, Jovanka Lević8, Ilias Giannenas9.
Abstract
The food of animal origin that is the most consumed is the table egg, but laying hens treated with antibiotics can produce eggs contaminated with antibiotic residues. Residues of antibiotics may present a risk for consumer health. Keeping in mind that laying hens almost always suffer from Mycoplasma (Mycoplasma synoviae), for which they are treated with antibiotics, high-quality egg production is even harder. Our research aimed to investigate the influence of three different antibiotics compared to the tea tree (Melaleuca alternifolia) essential oil administered to naturally infected laying hens with M. synoviae, on antibiotic residues in eggs as well as the egg nutritive and sensory qualities. A total of 20,000 laying hens, housed in one facility and divided into four lines each consisting of 5000 hens naturally infected with M. synoviae, was used. For the antimicrobial therapy, tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC) and chlortetracycline (CTC) were used, respectively. As a control, tea tree essential oil (TT) was used. Based on the gained results all tetracyclines treatment residue values were significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to the control treatment (TT), but without any significant differences (p > 0.05) between themselves. The results showed no differences in the nutritive and the sensory qualities of eggs between the control and the experimental treatments (p > 0.05). Keeping in mind the obtained results from this study, it can be concluded that tea tree essential oil could be successfully used as a natural antibiotic in the treatment of M. synoviae, without any adverse effects on table egg quality.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotics; eggs; essential oils; food; health; hens; protein; residues; tetracyclines
Year: 2020 PMID: 32403221 PMCID: PMC7278781 DOI: 10.3390/foods9050612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Experimental design with the laying hens.
| Treatment | Concentration, mg/kg of Hen Weight | Average Daily Feed Consumption g/day | Average Hen Weight, kg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT (control) | Tea tree essential oil | 100.00 | 110.00 | 1.79 ± 0.12 |
| TC | Tetracycline | 100.00 | 110.00 | 1.78 ± 0.23 |
| OTC | Oxytetracycline | 100.00 | 110.00 | 1.79 ± 0.07 |
| CTC | Chlortetracycline | 100.00 | 110.00 | 1.81 ± 0.16 |
The scoring method for the sensory quality of the fresh table eggs of the laying hens.
| Homogeneity | Acceptability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Description | Points | Description |
| 1 | Highly non-homogenous | 1 | Unacceptable |
| 2 | Non-homogenous | 2 | Almost unacceptable |
| 3 | Slightly homogenous | 3 | Nor acceptable nor unacceptable |
| 4 | Almost homogenous | 4 | Almost acceptable |
| 5 | Homogenous | 5 | Acceptable |
Figure 1Effects of the application of the compound feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg tea tree essential oil (TT), tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC) and chlortetracycline (CTC) on the laying hens’ recovery from mycoplasmosis.
Identified phenolic compounds of the tea tree essential oil, %.
| Compound | RT 2 | RI 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| α-Thujene | 5.636 | 922 | 1.10 ± 0.01 |
| α-Pinene | 5.862 | 930 | 18.38 ± 0.05 |
| Camphene | 6.241 | 945 | 0.08 ± 0.00 |
| Sabinene | 6.932 | 970 | 0.35 ± 0.00 |
| β-Pinene | 7.047 | 974 | 3.19 ± 0.01 |
| Myrcene | 7.428 | 988 | 0.45 ± 0.00 |
| α-Phellandrene | 7.900 | 1004 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| Δ3-Carene | 8.098 | 1009 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| α-Terpinene | 8.311 | 1015 | 2.35 ± 0.02 |
| 8.598 | 1023 | 4.30 ± 0.00 | |
| Limonene | 8.758 | 1027 | 7.55 ± 0.04 |
| 1,8-Cineole | 8.835 | 1029 | 2.15 ± 0.01 |
| β-(E)-Ocimene | 9.439 | 1046 | 0.08 ± 0.00 |
| γ-Terpinene | 9.890 | 1058 | 14.01 ± 0.02 |
| 10.891 | 1085 | 0.38 ± 0.00 | |
| Terpinolene | 10.991 | 1088 | 3.56 ± 0.01 |
| Borneol | 14.240 | 1164 | 0.14 ± 0.00 |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 14.944 | 1180 | 38.53 ± 0.06 |
| α-Terpineol | 15.340 | 1190 | 2.16 ± 0.00 |
| γ-Terpineol | 15.606 | 1196 | 0.21 ± 0.00 |
| (E)-Caryophyllene | 25.448 | 1419 | 0.38 ± 0.00 |
| NI 1 | <0.50 | ||
| Total peak area | 564685150 |
1 Not identified; 2 Retention time; 3 Experimental retention indices based on n-alkane series under identical experimental conditions and comparison was done with the mass spectra library search NIST [67]; SD—standard deviation calculated for n (n = 3) gas chromatography–mass spectrometric (GC–MS) analysis.
Effects of the applied tetracyclines on the recovery percentage and the residual antibiotics of the spiked samples in the eggs of the laying hens.
| Treatment | Recovery | Spiked Level, mg/kg | Residual Antibiotic Concentrations, mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 | |||
| TT (control) | % | 0.00 c | 0.00 c |
| SD | 0.00 | ||
| TC | % | 90.12 a | 0.15 a |
| SD | 3.91 | ||
| OTC | % | 85.25 b | 0.08 b |
| SD | 5.12 | ||
| CTC | % | 87.30 b | 0.11 a |
| SD | 4.73 | ||
| 0.018 | 0.022 | ||
| SEp | 1.255 | 0.816 | |
Different letters within a column indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05); SD—standard deviation; Sep—pooled standard error.
Nutritional quality and the pH values of the whole fresh table eggs.
| Treatment | Moisture, % | Protein, % | Fat, % | Ash, % | Egg pH Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albumen | Yolk | |||||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |
| TT (control) | 75.22 a ± 0.62 | 12.23 a ± 0.18 | 9.92 a ± 0.46 | 0.91 a ± 0.02 | 7.50 a ± 0.12 | 5.91 a ± 0.86 |
| TC | 74.86 a ± 0.54 | 12.18 a ± 0.32 | 9.63 a ± 0.44 | 0.95 a ± 0.05 | 7.60 a ± 0.34 | 5.83 a ± 0.33 |
| OTC | 74.96 a ± 0.61 | 12.21 a ± 0.28 | 9.84 a ± 0.52 | 0.87 a ± 0.04 | 7.22 a ± 0.11 | 6.20 a ± 0.41 |
| CTC | 75.15 a ± 0.59 | 12.22 a ± 0.17 | 9.97 a ± 0.49 | 0.91 a ± 0.03 | 7.68 a ± 0.25 | 5.91 a ± 0.18 |
| 0.833 | 0.624 | 0.891 | 0.929 | 0.522 | 0.609 | |
| SEp | 1.408 | 1.665 | 1.209 | 1.765 | 1.384 | 0.997 |
Different letters within a column indicate statistical differences (p < 0.05); SD—standard deviation; SEp—pooled standard error.
Figure 2The sensory quality of the fresh table eggs of the laying hens. 0–5 Points described in Table 2; TT, CTC, TC, OTC Experimental treatments described in Table 1.