Literature DB >> 32401798

Fruit and vegetable consumption in Europe according to gender, educational attainment and regional affiliation-A cross-sectional study in 21 European countries.

Tonje Holte Stea1, Oda Nordheim2, Elling Bere3,4, Per Stornes2, Terje Andreas Eikemo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to examine fruit and vegetable consumption according to gender, educational attainment and regional affiliation in Europe.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: 21 European countries. PARTICIPANTS: 37 672 adults participating in the 7th round of the European Social Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fruit and vegetable consumption was measured using two single frequency questions. Responses were dichotomized into low (<once a day) and high (≥once a day) consumption. The association between consumption of fruit and vegetables and gender, educational level, regional affiliation was examined using logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Overall, females showed increased odds of consuming fruit (OR 1.71 (95%CI:1.62, 1.79) and vegetable (1.59 (1.51, 1.67)) compared to males and high educated participants showed increased odds of consuming fruit (1.53 (1.43, 1.63)) and vegetables (1.86 (1.74, 2.00)) compared to low educated participants. Our results also showed that participants living in Eastern Europe had the lowest odds of consuming fruit and vegetables, whereas participants from Southern- and Northern Europe had the highest odds of consuming fruit and vegetables, respectively. Results from interaction analyses confirmed the positive association between fruit and vegetable consumption and educational level, although for some European regions, decreased odds of fruit and vegetables was observed among medium educated participants compared to those with low education.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the present study showed that being female and having a high education were associated with increased consumption of fruit and vegetables. However, the direction and strength of these relationships depends on regional affiliations.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32401798      PMCID: PMC7219700          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Studies have confirmed that low consumption of fruit, vegetables and fruit and vegetables combined, is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and all-cause mortality.[1,2,3] In addition to positive health impacts, a shift towards healthier plant-based diets will most likely have important environmental impacts by reducing the environmental footprint.[4] Thus, increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is an important component of a shift towards both healthier and more sustainable diets. Organized health promotion and disease prevention efforts in most European countries have focused specifically on initiatives to increase the consumption of fruit and vegetables among different groups.[5,6] The well-known 5/6-a-day campaign was originally initiated by the National Cancer Institute in the U.S in the 1990s, and later implemented in several European countries, but despite this and other health promoting initiatives, less than half of the countries of the WHO consume fruit and vegetables according to the WHO recommendations.[5] Educational attainment has been identified as one of the most important predictors of fruit and vegetable consumption and has also been positively associated with diet quality, diversity and higher odds to comply with national recommendations.[7,8,9] Studies have further shown a higher consumption of fruit and vegetables among women compared to men, and that gender differences in the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES)/educational level and fruit and vegetable consumption exists.[10-12] Although most European studies have reported a graded relationship between educational attainment and fruit and vegetable consumption, this is not a consistent finding. [10,13-16] Some studies have shown that in countries and regions characterized by high availability and consumption of fruit and vegetables, those with low education tend to have a higher consumption of these food items compared to those with high education.[17,18] Inconsistent findings may partly be explained by a general lack of comparable estimates due to different study designs; most previously published studies have focused on single countries,[15,19-21] whereas systematic reviews have based their conclusion on studies using different designs and modes of data collection.[16,18,22] The health module of the 7th round of the European Social Survey provides us with a unique opportunity to overcome these limitations with reliable and comparable estimates. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine how the consumption of fruit and vegetables varies according to gender, educational attainment and regional affiliation in a large representative sample of the European adult population.

Materials and methods

Design

The data was collected in 2014 as part of round 7 of the European Social Survey (ESS), in face-to-face interviews, using a standardized procedure, and designed to be representative of all persons aged 15 and over, resident within private households in each country. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection. The ESS ERIC Research Ethics Committee (REC) was established in 2015, and the present study was approved in accordance with the ESS ERIC Statutes (Article 23.3). The ESS ERIC subscribes to the Declaration on Professional Ethics of the International Statistical Institute, which can be downloaded from https://www.isi-web.org/index.php/activities/professional-ethics/isi-declaration. The total sample included 37 762 respondents. More information regarding the European Social Survey has been previously published elsewhere.[23] The following 21 countries were included: Austria (response rate: 52%), Belgium (57%), Czech Republic (68%), Denmark (52%), Estonia (60%), Finland (63%), France (51%), Germany (31%), Hungary (53%), Ireland (61%), Israel (74%), Lithuania (69%), Netherlands (59%), Norway (54%), Poland (66%), Portugal (43%), Slovenia (52%), Spain (68%), Sweden (50%), Switzerland (53%), and United Kingdom (44%). The data utilized for analyses in the present study was based on a self-report questionnaire which focused on attitudes, beliefs and behaviour patterns. Fruit consumption was measured by asking respondents ‘How often do you eat fruit, excluding drinking juice? Frozen fruit should be included’. Vegetable consumption was measured by asking ‘How often do you eat vegetables or salad, excluding potatoes? Frozen vegetables should be included’. Response categories for both fruit and vegetable consumption were: ‘1. Three times or more a day; 2. Twice a day; 3. Once a day; 4. Less than once a day but at least 4 times a week; 5. Less than 4 times a week but at least once a week; 6. Less than once a week; 7. Never. A consumption of once a day or more was acknowledged as an acceptable frequency of consuming these food items. Thus, consumption of both fruit and vegetables were further dichotomized into once a day or more (category 1–3; high consumption) or less than once a day (category 4–7; low consumption as reference category). The survey did not provide data on quantity and variety of fruit and vegetable consumption. The variable capturing age was coded into 5-year increments, from 15 upwards and capped at 79. Gender was coded as a dummy variable (reference females). Educational attainment was coded into three categories where no education, primary education and lower secondary education was coded as ‘low education’, upper secondary education was coded as ‘medium education’ and tertiary education was coded as ‘high education’. Dummy variables were also created to capture regional affiliation. The countries coded as Northern European include Denmark, Estonia, Finland, the UK, Ireland, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden. The countries coded as Western European include Austria, Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, France and the Netherlands. Finally, countries coded as Eastern European include Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, while Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Italy were coded as South Europe.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using Stata 16. We have presented descriptive statistics, including age, gender, education and fruit and vegetable consumption for each of the 21 European countries as well as mean values for the pooled sample. Further, fruit and vegetable consumption were analysed separately, using logistic regression analyses to estimate odds ratios for high frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption according to gender, education and regional affiliation. The ESS post-stratification weight was applied in all analyses. In the first part of the analyses, we examined odds ratios for high frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption according to gender, education and regional affiliation. Based on the results from these analyses, we further examined how interactions between regional affiliation and education affect frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption among men and women, respectively. Thus, we used regression analyses stratified by gender to examine how FV consumption varied among participants from different European regions according to educational level using low educated Eastern European males or females as reference groups, respectively. All regression models were adjusted for age and the likelihood ratio test confirmed that the interactions between region and education were statistically significant contributors to the models focusing on both fruit and vegetable consumption (p<0.001 for both). We also conducted a chow test which confirmed that education and region have a significantly different impact on consumption frequency among women compared to men, related to both fruit and vegetables (p<0.001 for both).

Results

Descriptive results are presented in Table 1. The total sample was 37 672, with single country samples ranging from 1161 (Slovenia) to 2891 (Germany). For the pooled sample, the mean age was 47 years, and there was a slightly higher proportion of females (52.6%). Mean age for the single countries varied from 45 (Belgium) to 50 (Portugal), and the proportion of women from 46% (Norway) to 61% (Lithuania). Educational level was low for 25%, medium for 51% and high for 23% of the pooled sample.
Table 1

Age, gender, education and fruit and vegetable consumption in the European Social Survey round 7 (n = 37 672).

CountryNMean ageFemales (%)Education (%)Fruit cons. (%)Veg cons. (%)
LowMed.HighHigh1High1
AT1 70548522065156458
BE1 66445492936356585
CH1 46046502248307383
CZ2 07446531272155346
DE2 89149491252367167
DK1 42646482234437271
EE1 91148581452336870
ES1 78846485322247556
FI1 94249502239397077
FR1 78147522244346776
GB2 01550553325407278
HU1 62249571961194236
IE2 22648543632307381
IL2 32946551544407079
LT2 13449612244335468
NL1 80549553530347078
NO1 37845461839437178
PL1 53446544337206971
PT1 16550546219188478
SE1 66147501845366278
SI1 16148542154258081

Country abbreviations: HU-Hungary, NL-Netherlands, AT-Austria, CZ-Czech Republic, DE-Germany, ES-Spain, PL-Poland, EE-Estonia, BE-Belgium, SI-Slovenia, NO-Norway, LT-Lithuania, IE-Ireland, DK-Denmark, CH-Switzerland, SE-Sweden, FI-Finland, GB-United Kingdom, IL-Israel, FR-France, PT-Portugal.

1At least one fruit or vegetable per day

Country abbreviations: HU-Hungary, NL-Netherlands, AT-Austria, CZ-Czech Republic, DE-Germany, ES-Spain, PL-Poland, EE-Estonia, BE-Belgium, SI-Slovenia, NO-Norway, LT-Lithuania, IE-Ireland, DK-Denmark, CH-Switzerland, SE-Sweden, FI-Finland, GB-United Kingdom, IL-Israel, FR-France, PT-Portugal. 1At least one fruit or vegetable per day Regression analyses for the pooled sample adjusted for age (Table 2) showed increased odds of consuming fruit and vegetables among females (OR 1.71 (1.62, 1.79) and OR 1.59 (1.51, 1.67), respectively) and among high educated participant (OR 1.53 (1.43, 1.63) and OR 1.86 (1.74, 2.00, respectively) compared to males and low educated participant. Further results revealed increased odds of consuming fruit and vegetables among participants from Northern Europe (OR 1.66 (1.54, 1.78) and OR 2.79 (2.59, 3.00), respectively), Western Europe (OR 1.73 (1.60, 1.86) and OR 2.58 (2.39, 2.78), respectively) and Southern Europe (OR 2.51 (2.29, 2.74) and OR 2.53 (2.32, 2.76), respectively) compared to those from Eastern Europe (reference category).
Table 2

Consumption frequency of fruit and vegetables according to gender and educational level (n = 37 672).

 High fruit consumptionHigh vegetable consumption
VARIABLESOR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Gender  
    Male (ref)1.001.00
    Female1.71 (1.62, 1.79)***1.59 (1.51, 1.67)***
Education  
    Low (ref)1.001.00
    Medium1.04 (0.98, 1.10)1.16 (1.09, 1.24)***
    High1.53 (1.43, 1.63)***1.86 (1.74, 2.00)***
Regional affiliation  
Eastern Europe (ref)1.001.00
Northern Europe1.66 (1.54, 1.78)***2.79 (2.59, 3.00)***
Western Europe1.73 (1.60, 1.86)***2.58 (2.39, 2.78)***
Southern Europe2.51 (2.29, 2.74)***2.53 (2.32, 2.76)***

Reference groups are marked with OR = 1.00

All analyses were adjusted for age

* p<0.1, ** p<0.05

*** p<0.01

Reference groups are marked with OR = 1.00 All analyses were adjusted for age * p<0.1, ** p<0.05 *** p<0.01 Analyses presented in Table 3 show how the interactions between regional affiliation and education was associated with fruit and vegetable consumption. In Eastern Europe, the results showed increased odds of consuming fruit among high educated females compared to low educated females (OR 2.16 (1.65, 2.81). Likewise, increased odds of consuming vegetables were observed among high (OR 2.06 (1.60, 2.66) educated females living in Eastern Europe.
Table 3

Interactions between regional affiliation and educational level and odds for high frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption among males (n = 17 845) and females (n = 19 827).

High fruit consumptionHigh vegetable consumption
VARIABLESMalesFemalesMalesFemales
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Eastern Europe
Low education (ref)1.001.001.001.00
    Medium education0.86 (0.69, 1.06)1.24 (1.02, 1.52)**0.68 (0.56, 0.84)***1.21 (1.00, 1.47)**
    High education1.12 (0.85, 1.48)2.16 (1.65, 2.81)***1.14 (0.87, 1.51)2.06 (1.60, 2.66)***
Northern Europe
    Low education1.46 (1.18, 1.80)***1.53 (1.24, 1.88)***1.66 (1.36, 2.04)***2.68 (2.19, 3.27)***
    Medium education1.38 (1.14, 1.68)***2.08 (1.72, 2.53)***1.95 (1.61, 2.37)***4.02 (3.32, 4.86)***
    High education2.26 (1.84, 2.77)***3.52 (2.89, 4.28)***3.53 (2.87, 4.34)***6.41 (5.26, 7.81)***
Western Europe
    Low education1.46 (1.17, 1.83)***2.02 (1.63, 2.51)***1.98 (1.59, 2.47)***2.96 (2.40, 3.66)***
    Medium education1.53 (1.26, 1.87)***2.40 (1.98, 2.92)***1.74 (1.43, 2.11)***3.33 (2.76, 4.03)***
    High education1.89 (1.53, 2.33)***2.89 (2.33, 3.58)***2.55 (2.06, 3.15)***6.53 (5.19, 8.22)***
Southern Europe
    Low education2.70 (2.14, 3.41)***3.41 (2.69, 4.33)***1.57 (1.26, 1.96)***2.39 (1.93, 2.97)***
    Medium education2.13 (1.70, 2.67)***2.54 (2.02, 3.19)***2.45 (1.95, 3.06)***3.42 (2.73, 4.28)***
    High education2.91 (2.26, 3.74)***3.97 (3.11, 5.07)***2.57 (2.01, 3.28)***4.53 (3.57, 5.74)***

Reference groups are marked with OR = 1.00

All analyses were adjusted for age

* p<0.1

** p<0.05

*** p<0.01

Reference groups are marked with OR = 1.00 All analyses were adjusted for age * p<0.1 ** p<0.05 *** p<0.01 Compared to low educated males from Eastern Europe (ref), the results showed increased odds of consuming fruit among low and high educated males living in Northern Europe (OR 1.46 (1.18, 1.80) and OR 2.26 (1.84, 2.77), respectively), Western Europe (OR 1.46 (1.17, 1.83) and OR 1.89 (1.53, 2.33), respectively) and Southern Europe (OR 2.70 (2.14, 3.41) and OR 2.91 (2.26, 3.74), respectively). Likewise, increased odds of consuming fruit were observed among low and high educated females from Northern Europe (OR 1.53 (1.24, 1.88) and OR 3.52 (2.89, 4.28), respectively), Western Europe (OR 2.02 (1.63, 2.51) and OR 2.89 (2.33, 3.58), respectively) and Southern Europe (OR 3.41 (2.69, 4.33) and OR 3.97 (3.11, 5.07)) compared to low educated females from Eastern Europe (ref). Among Eastern European participants, medium educated males showed decreased odds of vegetable consumption compared to low educated males. Furthermore, the results showed increased odds of consuming vegetables among low and high educated males from Northern Europe (OR 1.66 (1.36, 2.04) and OR 3.53 (2.87, 4.34), respectively), Western Europe (OR 1.98 (1.59, 2.47) and OR 2.55 (2.06, 3.15), respectively) and Southern Europe (OR 2.39 (1.93, 2.97) and OR 4.53 (3.57, 5.74), respectively), compared to low educated Eastern European males (ref). For females, similar results showed increased odds of consuming vegetables among low and high educated participants from Northern Europe (OR 2.68 (2.19, 3.27) and OR 6.41 (5.26, 7.81), respectively), Western Europe (OR 2.96 (2.40, 3.66) and OR 6.53 (5.19, 8.22), respectively) and Southern Europe (OR 2.39 (1.93, 2.97) and OR 4.53 (3.57, 5.74), respectively), compared to low educated females in Eastern Europe (ref).

Discussion

Based on the total study sample, the results showed a gender and education gradient in which being female and having high education was associated with increased consumption of fruit and vegetables. Overall, our results also showed that participants living in Eastern Europe had the lowest odds of consuming fruit and vegetables, whereas participants from Southern- and Northern European countries had the highest odds consuming of fruit and vegetables, respectively. Although few previously published studies have compared data from many different European countries, variations in the patterns of fruit and vegetable consumption between countries and regions have been identified.[10,13-16] Similar to our findings, a systematic review has confirmed a lower consumption of fruit, but no differences in vegetable consumption between participants living in Eastern Europe and those living in other European countries.[24] As suggested by the authors, lack of differences in regional consumption of vegetables reported in the systematic review might be explained be lack of north/south weighting of health behavioral survey results.[24] In our study, interaction analyses examining the association between regional affiliation and consumption of fruit and vegetables also revealed interesting nuances in the results; high educated Eastern European females, but not males showed significantly increased odds of consuming fruit and vegetables compared with low educated participants from this region. Medium educated males, however, showed decreased odds of consuming vegetables compared to low educated males from Eastern Europe. Furthermore, some results also indicate decreased odds of fruit and vegetables among medium educated participants compared to those with low education. These results may partly be explained by findings from a few previously published studies, which showed that in regions characterized by high availability, high affordability and high consumption of fruit and vegetables, lower social classes tend to have a higher consumption of fruit and vegetables than higher social classes.[16,18] Roos et al[18] has also suggested that a high consumption of fruit among low educated participants may be expected in regions such as Southern Europe, with better access to cheaper and fresh commodities. Furthermore, low educated adults with high income have previously reported similar consumption of fruit and vegetables as those with intermediate or high education.[25] These findings are in line with previous studies which have identified the role of economic constraints and absolute cost of fruit and vegetables on food choices,[26,27] and that dietary costs are in the causal pathway between socioeconomic status and diet, especially among less-educated and lower-income groups.[28,29] Compared with previously published studies focusing on socio-demographic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption, the present study has improved the comparability by using standardized data collection methods, including nationally representative data from 21 countries in Europe. When interpreting the results from the present study, several other methodological aspects must be taken into consideration. One of the most important limitation was that only data concerning frequency of fruit and vegetable consumption, rather than portion sizes, were available. Due to limited data, it was not possible to calculate whether the respondents fulfilled the WHO criteria of eating 5 portions of fruit and vegetables per day. Furthermore, the questions used to identify frequency of vegetable consumption did not specify that processed vegetables should be reported as well as consumption of fresh vegetables. As vegetables traditionally are consumed in cooked form in several Eastern European countries, the consumption of vegetables among Eastern European participants may have been underestimated. It should also be noticed that generally, frequency questionnaires often tend to over-estimate the consumption of fruit and vegetables regardless of regional affiliation.[30] The present study may also potentially be biased due to over-reporting intake of fruit and vegetables. Especially those with higher education, and increased knowledge about healthy lifestyle habits, such as eating habits, are often more likely to over-report fruit and vegetable consumption.[31]

Conclusions

Being female and having high educational level was positively associated with fruit and vegetable consumption in most European regions. However, the results showed some variations in consumption according to educational level and regional affiliation. Knowledge about inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption according to gender, educational attainment and regional affiliation should inform the development of public health policies and practices across Europe.
  28 in total

1.  Disparities in food habits across Europe.

Authors:  Antonia Trichopoulou; Androniki Naska; Tina Costacou
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.297

2.  Social determinants of dietary habits in Denmark.

Authors:  M V Groth; S Fagt; L Brøndsted
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Association between educational level and vegetable use in nine European countries.

Authors:  Ritva Prättälä; Samu Hakala; Albert-Jan R Roskam; Eva Roos; Uwe Helmert; Jurate Klumbiene; Herman Van Oyen; Enrique Regidor; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Socioeconomic determinants of dietary patterns in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana-Lucia Mayén; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Fred Paccaud; Pascal Bovet; Silvia Stringhini
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Gender differences in opinions and practices with regard to a "healthy diet".

Authors:  R A Fagerli; M Wandel
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Socio-economic circumstances and food habits in Eastern, Central and Western European populations.

Authors:  Sinéad Boylan; Tea Lallukka; Eero Lahelma; Hynek Pikhart; Sofia Malyutina; Andrzej Pajak; Ruzena Kubinova; Oksana Bragina; Urszula Stepaniak; Aleksandra Gillis-Januszewska; Galina Simonova; Anne Peasey; Martin Bobak
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables.

Authors:  J D Irala-Estévez; M Groth; L Johansson; U Oltersdorf; R Prättälä; M A Martínez-González
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Trends of socioeconomic differences in daily vegetable consumption, 1979-2002.

Authors:  E Roos; K Talala; M Laaksonen; S Helakorpi; O Rahkonen; A Uutela; R Prättälä
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Socio-economic disparities in the consumption of vegetables, fruit and energy-dense foods: the role of motive priorities.

Authors:  Hanna Konttinen; Sirpa Sarlio-Lähteenkorva; Karri Silventoinen; Satu Männistö; Ari Haukkala
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality?

Authors:  A Aggarwal; P Monsivais; A J Cook; A Drewnowski
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  10 in total

1.  Diet Quality Compared to the Nutritional Knowledge of Polish, German, and Slovakian University Students-Preliminary Research.

Authors:  Edyta Suliga; Elżbieta Cieśla; Sven Michel; Helena Kaducakova; Titus Martin; Grzegorz Śliwiński; Alexander Braun; Marcela Izova; Maria Lehotska; Dorota Kozieł; Stanisław Głuszek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Vegetable intake and the risk of bladder cancer in the BLadder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) international study.

Authors:  Evan Yi-Wen Yu; Anke Wesselius; Siamak Mehrkanoon; Mieke Goosens; Maree Brinkman; Piet van den Brandt; Eric J Grant; Emily White; Elisabete Weiderpass; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Marc J Gunter; Inge Huybrechts; Elio Riboli; Anne Tjonneland; Giovanna Masala; Graham G Giles; Roger L Milne; Maurice P Zeegers
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Dietary Changes among Adults in The Netherlands in the Period 2007-2010 and 2012-2016. Results from Two Cross-Sectional National Food Consumption Surveys.

Authors:  Ceciel S Dinnissen; Marga C Ocké; Elly J M Buurma-Rethans; Caroline T M van Rossum
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Classification tree analysis for an intersectionality-informed identification of population groups with non-daily vegetable intake.

Authors:  Emily Mena; Gabriele Bolte
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Dietary patterns among Saudis with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Riyadh: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abeer Ali Aljahdali; Nahla Mohammed Bawazeer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Public Opinion on Food Policies to Combat Obesity in Spain.

Authors:  Cristina Cavero Esponera; Sara Fernández Sánchez-Escalonilla; Miguel Ángel Royo-Bordonada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Understanding Blood versus Blond Orange Consumption: A Cross-Cultural Study in Four Countries.

Authors:  Adrián Giménez-Sanchis; Kui Zhong; Aurora Pintor; Vittorio Farina; Cristina Besada
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-09-02

8.  Sleep duration, vegetable consumption and all-cause mortality among older adults in China: a 6-year prospective study.

Authors:  Chen Bai; Muqi Guo; Yao Yao; John S Ji; Danan Gu; Yi Zeng
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.921

9.  Applying the Stages of Change Model in a Nutrition Education Programme for the Promotion of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption among People with Severe Mental Disorders (DIETMENT).

Authors:  Mireia Vilamala-Orra; Cristina Vaqué-Crusellas; Quintí Foguet-Boreu; Marta Guimerà Gallent; Ruben Del Río Sáez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Innovation as a Factor Increasing Fruit Consumption: The Case of Poland.

Authors:  Dagmara Stangierska; Iwona Kowalczuk; Katarzyna Widera; Dawid Olewnicki; Piotr Latocha
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.