Literature DB >> 11002383

A systematic review of socio-economic differences in food habits in Europe: consumption of fruit and vegetables.

J D Irala-Estévez1, M Groth, L Johansson, U Oltersdorf, R Prättälä, M A Martínez-González.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in the consumption of fruit and vegetables between groups with different socio-economic status (SES) in the adult population of European countries.
DESIGN: A systematic review of published and unpublished surveys of food habits conducted between 1985 and 1999 in 15 European countries. Educational level and occupational status were used as indicators of SES. A pooled estimate of the mean difference between the highest and the lowest level of education and occupation was calculated separately for men and women, using DerSimonian and Laird's random effects model.
SETTING: The inclusion criteria of studies were: use of a validated method for assessing intake at the individual level; selection of a nationwide sample or a representative sample of a region; and providing the mean and standard deviation of overall fruit and vegetable consumption for each level of education or occupation, and separately for men and women.
SUBJECTS: Participants in the individual surveys had to be adults (18-85 y).
RESULTS: Eleven studies from seven countries met the criteria for being included in the meta-analysis. A higher SES was associated with a greater consumption of both fruit and vegetables. The pooled estimate of the difference in the intake of fruit was 24.3 g/person/day (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.0-34.7) between men in the highest level of education and those in the lowest level of education. Similarly, this difference was 33.6 g/person/day for women (95% CI 22.5-44.8). The differences regarding vegetables were 17.0 g/person/day (95% CI 8.6-25.5) for men and 13.4 g/person/day (95% CI 7.1-19.7) for women. The results were in the same direction when occupation instead of education was used as an indicator of SES.
CONCLUSIONS: Although we cannot exclude over-reporting of intake by those with highest SES, it is unlikely that this potential bias could fully explain the differences we have found. Our results suggest that an unhealthier nutrition pattern may exist among adults belonging to lower socio-economic levels in Europe. SPONSORSHIP: The present study was supported by the European Union's FAIR programme (FAIR-97-3096).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11002383     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  127 in total

Review 1.  Effect of socioeconomic status on the relationship between atmospheric pollution and mortality.

Authors:  Olivier Laurent; Denis Bard; Laurent Filleul; Claire Segala
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Produce Prescriptions, Food Pharmacies, and the Potential Effect on Food Choice.

Authors:  Nicole D White
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2020-04-26

3.  Adolescent and mid-life diet and subsequent risk of thyroid cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study.

Authors:  Melissa Z Braganza; Nancy Potischman; Yikyung Park; Frances E Thompson; Albert R Hollenbeck; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  The influence of socioeconomic markers on the association between fine particulate matter and hospital admissions for respiratory conditions among children.

Authors:  Poh-Sin Yap; Susan Gilbreath; Cynthia Garcia; Nargis Jareen; Bryan Goodrich
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Food taxes: a new holy grail?

Authors:  Ignaas Devisch
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2013-07-11

6.  Adherence to dietary guidelines for fruit, vegetables and fish among older Dutch adults; the role of education, income and job prestige.

Authors:  S C Dijkstra; J E Neter; I A Brouwer; M Huisman; M Visser
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 7.  Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care.

Authors:  Alexander M Clark; Marie DesMeules; Wei Luo; Amanda S Duncan; Andy Wielgosz
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class: a cross sectional population study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk).

Authors:  Shamarina Shohaimi; Ailsa Welch; Sheila Bingham; Robert Luben; Nicholas Day; Nicholas Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  The prospective association of socioeconomic status with C-reactive protein levels in the CARDIA study.

Authors:  Denise Janicki Deverts; Sheldon Cohen; Preety Kalra; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 7.217

10.  Fruit and vegetable consumption close to recommendations. A partly web-based nationwide dietary survey in Swedish adults.

Authors:  Anna-Mari Simunaniemi; Agneta Andersson; Margaretha Nydahl
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.