Literature DB >> 32399264

BRAF-V600E and microsatellite instability prediction through CA-19-9/CEA ratio in patients with colorectal cancer.

Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi1, Saivaishnavi Kamatham2, Faisal Shahjehan3, Zhuo Li4, Patrick W Johnson4, Amit Merchea5, Dorin T Colibaseanu5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early identification of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients that are BRAF-V600E mutant and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High), has both prognostic and predictive value. We wanted to highlight an observation of utilizing 2 simple, rapid and universally available lab tests, i.e., carbohydrate cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tumor markers, the ratio (CA-19-9/CEA) of which can distinctly identify these patients from other molecular subsets of CRC.
METHODS: All patients with metastatic CRC from December 2016 to February 2019 were identified, and included in the study if they had both CA19-9 and CEA tests available. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing and tissue genetic testing results were used to categorize patients into BRAF V600E microsatellite stable (MSS), MSI-High, RAS mutant MSS and RAS/RAF wild type CRCs. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the CA19-9/CEA ratio between mutation types and the pairwise p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons with Holm method. For sensitivity analysis, the same analysis was repeated for the mean and median ratio of each patient. All tests were two-sided with alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance.
RESULTS: BRAF-V600E MSS CRC patients had a discordantly profound elevation in CA-19-9 levels as opposed to the CEA levels. Patients in the BRAF V600E MSS subset had the highest median CA19-9/CEA ratio versus the least median ratio in MSI-High patients. The median of maximum CA-19-9/CEA ratio was 28.92 (range, 2.76-707.27) in BRAF-V600E MSS patients and 4.06 (range, 0.46-166.74) in MSI-High subset of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: To date, this is the first report utilizing the ratio of tumor markers CA19-9/CEA as a predictive rather than just prognostic tool to identify BRAF-V600E MSS and MSI-High CRC patients. 2020 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF-V600E; Colorectal cancer (CRC); cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); ctDNA; microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32399264      PMCID: PMC7212105          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.12.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  16 in total

1.  Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Kaori Shima; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Nadine J McCleary; Kimmie Ng; Donna Hollis; Leonard B Saltz; Robert J Mayer; Paul Schaefer; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B Benson; Donna Spiegelman; Richard M Goldberg; Monica M Bertagnolli; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  CEA and CA 19-9 are still valuable markers for the prognosis of colorectal and gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Abdullah Sisik; Mustafa Kaya; Gurhan Bas; Fatih Basak; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2013

3.  NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: colon cancer.

Authors:  Paul F Engstrom; Juan Pablo Arnoletti; Al B Benson; Yi-Jen Chen; Michael A Choti; Harry S Cooper; Anne Covey; Raza A Dilawari; Dayna S Early; Peter C Enzinger; Marwan G Fakih; James Fleshman; Charles Fuchs; Jean L Grem; Krystyna Kiel; James A Knol; Lucille A Leong; Edward Lin; Mary F Mulcahy; Sujata Rao; David P Ryan; Leonard Saltz; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos Sofocleous; James Thomas; Alan P Venook; Christopher Willett
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Diagnostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carcinoma antigen 19-9 for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shi-Yan Zhang; Min Lin; Hui-Bing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 5.  The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer.

Authors:  Maria S Pino; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer depends on the mismatch repair status.

Authors:  Rodrigo Jover; Pedro Zapater; Antoni Castells; Xavier Llor; Montserrat Andreu; Joaquín Cubiella; Francesc Balaguer; Laura Sempere; Rosa M Xicola; Luis Bujanda; Josep M Reñé; Juan Clofent; Xavier Bessa; Juan D Morillas; David Nicolás-Pérez; Elisenda Pons; Artemio Payá; Cristina Alenda
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Combined detection of preoperative serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA242 improve prognostic prediction of surgically treated colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jingtao Wang; Xiao Wang; Fudong Yu; Jian Chen; Senlin Zhao; Dongyuan Zhang; Yang Yu; Xisheng Liu; Huamei Tang; Zhihai Peng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-11-01

8.  Serum CEA and CA 19-9 Levels are Associated with the Presence and Severity of Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Mi Yeon Lee; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn; Kyuyong Choi; Yoon Suk Jung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation testing in colorectal cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Aya Kuchiba; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Mai Yamauchi; Reiko Nishihara; Zhi Rong Qian; Teppei Morikawa; Jeanne Shen; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Toward a Molecular Classification of Colorectal Cancer: The Role of BRAF.

Authors:  Alexandra Thiel; Ari Ristimäki
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of circulating tumor-derived DNA in the management of gastrointestinal cancers - current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Rachel C T Lam; David Johnson; Gigi Lam; Michelle L Y Li; Joyce W L Wong; W K Jacky Lam; K C Allen Chan; Brigette Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP)-Informed Personalized Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Detection: An Exploratory Analysis from the PREDATOR Study of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection.

Authors:  Sara Lonardi; Halla Nimeiri; Chang Xu; Daniel R Zollinger; Russell W Madison; Alexander D Fine; Ole Gjoerup; Cosimo Rasola; Valentina Angerilli; Shruti Sharma; Hsin-Ta Wu; Charuta C Palsuledesai; Meenakshi Malhotra; Alexey Aleshin; Fotios Loupakis; Elise Renkonen; Priti Hegde; Matteo Fassan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) serial analysis during progression on PD-1 blockade and later CTLA-4 rescue in patients with mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi; Griffin Budde; Michael Krainock; Vasily N Aushev; Allyson Koyen Malashevich; Meenakshi Malhotra; Perry Olshan; Paul R Billings; Alexey Aleshin
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 13.751

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.