Literature DB >> 23991991

CEA and CA 19-9 are still valuable markers for the prognosis of colorectal and gastric cancer patients.

Abdullah Sisik1, Mustafa Kaya, Gurhan Bas, Fatih Basak, Orhan Alimoglu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive effect of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on the prognosis of colorectal and gastric cancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: CEA and CA 19-9 were evaluated preoperatively in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (n=116) and gastric cancer (n=49). Patients with CEA levels <5 ng/mL were classified as CEA Group 1, 5-30 ng/mL as CEA Group 2 and >30 ng/ mL were classified as CEA Group 3. Similarly the patients with a CA 19-9 level <35 U/mL were classified as CA 19-9 Group 1, with 35-100 U/mL as Group 2 and with >100 U/mL as Group and 3. TNM stages and histologic grades were noted according to histopathological reports. Patients with a TNM grade 0 or 1 were classified as Group A, TNM grade 2 patients constituted Group B and TNM grade 3 and 4 patients constituted Group C. Demographic characteristics, tumor locations and blood types of the patients were all recorded and these data were compared with the preoperative CEA and CA19-9 values.
RESULTS: A significant correlation between CA 19-9 levels (>100 U/mL) and TNM stage (in advanced stages) was determined. We also determined a significant correlation between TNM stages and positive vlaues for both CEA and CA 19-9 in colorectal and gastric cancer patients. In comparison between CEA and CA 19-9 levels and age, gender, tumor location, ABO blood group, and tumor histologic grade, no significant correlation was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Positive levels of both CEA and CA 19-9 can be considered to indicate an advanced stage in colorectal and gastric cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23991991     DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.7.4289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


  30 in total

1.  The Utility of Preoperative Tumor Markers in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Primary Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: an Analysis from the US HIPEC Collaborative.

Authors:  Nadege Fackche; Ryan K Schmocker; Boateng Kubi; Jordan M Cloyd; Ahmed Ahmed; Travis Grotz; Jennifer Leiting; Keith Fournier; Andrew J Lee; Benjamin Powers; Sean Dineen; Jula Veerapong; Joel M Baumgartner; Callisia Clarke; T Clark Gamblin; Sameer H Patel; Vikrom Dhar; Ryan J Hendrix; Laura Lambert; Daniel E Abbott; Courtney Pokrzywa; Kelly Lafaro; Byrne Lee; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Shishir K Maithel; Fabian M Johnston; Jonathan B Greer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Han-Shao Liu; Hua-Sheng Xiao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Use of serum and peritoneal CEA and CA19-9 in prediction of peritoneal dissemination and survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients: are they prognostic factors?

Authors:  M Hasbahceci; F U Malya; E Kunduz; M Guzel; N Unver; A Akcakaya
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Differences and correlation of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Junxiu Yu; Shuguang Zhang; Bingbo Zhao
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 5.  Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

Authors:  Andrey Iskrenov Kotzev; Peter Vassilev Draganov
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  Nomogram model characterized by mutant genes and clinical indexes to identify high-risk patients with stage III/IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Cui Wang; Jiefu Wang; Yang Zhan; Xin Yue; Dalu Kong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-12

7.  Diagnostic value of combined detection of CA72-4, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen comparing to CA72-4 alone in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huiping Wang; Weibiao Jin; Chuanqi Wan; Chen Zhu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.241

8.  A Novel Electrochemical Microfluidic Chip Combined with Multiple Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yao Xie; Xiao Zhi; Haichuan Su; Kan Wang; Zhen Yan; Nongyue He; Jingpu Zhang; Di Chen; Daxiang Cui
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.703

9.  BRAF-V600E and microsatellite instability prediction through CA-19-9/CEA ratio in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi; Saivaishnavi Kamatham; Faisal Shahjehan; Zhuo Li; Patrick W Johnson; Amit Merchea; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04

10.  Transcription factor PAX4 facilitates gastric cancer progression through interacting with miR-27b-3p/Grb2 axis.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Li Ding; Qingfeng Ni; Ran Tao; Jun Qin
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.