| Literature DB >> 32396131 |
Christina J Sun1, Kirsten M Anderson1, Tamara Kuhn2, Liat Mayer3, Charles H Klein3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV severely impacts the transgender communities in the United States, and transgender women have the highest HIV incidence rates among any identified risk group. Guided by formative research with transgender women and by an expert advisory panel of transgender women, we designed a prototype mobile app to promote HIV prevention among transgender women.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; health care disparities; health status disparities; minority health; sexual health; transgender persons
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32396131 PMCID: PMC7251477 DOI: 10.2196/15888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ISSN: 2291-5222 Impact factor: 4.773
Figure 1Prototype development process. PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis; STD: sexually transmitted disease.
Figure 2Welcome screen for the Trans Women Connected mobile app.
Figure 3A screenshot of the Create Your Own Vision (Board) prototype activity.
Figure 4A screenshot of the Is pre-exposure prophylaxis Right for Me or My Partners? prototype activity.
Figure 5A screenshot of a video within the Is pre-exposure prophylaxis Right for Me or My Partners? prototype activity.
Figure 6A screenshot of the Interactive Resource Map prototype activity.
Participant characteristics.
| Characteristics | Values | |
|
| ||
|
| San Francisco | 11 (69) |
|
| Portland | 5 (31) |
|
| ||
|
| Transgender woman | 14 (88) |
|
| Nonbinary | 2 (13) |
|
| ||
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 3 (19) |
|
| Asian | 5 (31) |
|
| Black or African American | 3 (19) |
|
| Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 1 (6) |
|
| White/Caucasian | 6 (38) |
|
| Other | 3 (19) |
|
| ||
|
| Hispanic or Latinx | 2 (13) |
|
| Non-Hispanic or Latinx | 14 (88) |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 34.5 (9.28) | |
|
| ||
|
| Very experienced | 14 (88) |
|
| A lot of experience | 1 (6) |
|
| Some experience | 1 (6) |
|
| Not much experience | 0 (0) |
|
| No experience | 0 (0) |
|
| ||
|
| Online | 0 (0) |
|
| In person | 7 (44) |
|
| Both online and in person | 8 (50) |
|
| Other | 1 (6) |
|
| ||
|
| Online | 3 (19) |
|
| In person | 9 (56) |
|
| Both online and in person | 4 (25) |
|
| Other | 0 (0) |
aParticipants could select more than one option.
Usability and likability ratings of the Trans Women Connected mobile app.
| Variable | Values, mean (SD)a | |
|
| ||
|
| Likeability of opening screen | 6.25 (1.24) |
|
| Likeability of menu system | 5.66 (1.81) |
|
| ||
|
| Likeability of the appearance | 6.28 (1.49) |
|
| Likeability of the interface | 6.44 (0.73) |
|
| Likeability of the narrator | 5.80 (1.14) |
|
| ||
|
| Likeability overall | 5.57 (1.60) |
|
| Likeability of women in the videos | 6.14 (1.03) |
|
| ||
|
| Usefulness | 6.73 (0.59) |
|
| ||
|
| Appearance | 6.38 (1.15) |
|
| Contents | 6.39 (0.65) |
|
| Ease of use | 6.25 (1.29) |
|
| Interest | 6.08 (1.16) |
|
| Professionally designed | 5.92 (1.38) |
|
| Enjoyability | 6.25 (1.48) |
|
| Usefulness | 6.50 (1.24) |
|
| Educational value | 6.25 (0.87) |
|
| Likelihood of using | 6.58 (0.68) |
|
| Likelihood of recommending | 6.62 (1.39) |
a7 represents the most positive or highest rating; the study benchmark was 4.
bPrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.
Self-efficacy, intention, knowledge, goal setting, and social support: pre– and post–usability testing scores.
| Variable | Usability testing scores | ||
|
| Pre | Post |
|
| Self-efficacy in finding LGBTQa-friendly services, mean (SD) | 3.19 (0.75) | 3.69 (0.48) | .01 |
| Likelihood of seeking LGBTQ-friendly services, mean (SD) | 3.69 (0.48) | 3.56 (0.81) | .48 |
| Intention to make medical appointmentb, mean (SD) | 3.88 (0.34) | 3.88 (0.50) | >.99 |
| Created health goals, n (%) | 13 (81) | 13 (81) | >.99 |
| Considered steps to reach goalc, n (%) | 9 (69) | 9 (69) | >.99 |
| Have social support to help reach goal, n (%) | 12 (75) | 14 (88) | .16 |
| Availability of social support, mean (SD) | 2.63 (1.02) | 3.00 (0.97) | .71 |
| Intention to seek online supportb, mean (SD) | 2.56 (1.09) | 3.06 (1.00) | .03 |
| Intention to seek local support servicesb, mean (SD) | 3.38 (0.81) | 3.50 (0.63) | .48 |
| Helpfulness of mentoring from another trans woman, mean (SD) | 4.06 (1.24) | 4.19 (1.28) | .91 |
| Intention to mentor other transgender women on app, mean (SD) | 3.38 (0.89) | 3.56 (0.63) | .48 |
| Can identify friends/family for support, n (%) | 15 (94) | 16 (100) | >.99 |
| PrEPd knowledge, mean (SD) | 2.50 (1.37) | 3.56 (0.63) | .008 |
| Intention to seek more info about PrEPb, mean (SD) | 2.80 (1.21) | 2.81 (1.22) | .58 |
| Intention to discuss PrEP with providerb, mean (SD) | 2.07 (0.80) | 2.00 (0.97) | >.99 |
| Intention to discuss PrEP with partnerb,e, n (%) | 6 (40) | 6 (40) | >.99 |
| Self-efficacy in discussing PrEP, mean (SD) | 3.00 (1.13) | 3.25 (0.86) | .16 |
| Connection to other transgender women, mean (SD) | 6.44 (2.60) | 6.63 (2.33) | .78 |
| Satisfaction with connection to other transgender women, mean (SD) | 5.00 (1.67) | 5.19 (1.83) | .26 |
| Level of social support from other transgender women, mean (SD) | 5.19 (1.87) | 5.21 (1.81) | .72 |
aLGBTQ: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer.
bIn the next 30 days.
cOut of 13 participants.
dPrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis.
eOut of 15 participants.