Literature DB >> 32395706

Responsiveness of Device-Based and Self-Report Measures of Physical Activity to Detect Behavior Change in Men Taking Part in the Football Fans in Training (FFIT) Program.

Craig Donnachie1, Kate Hunt2, Nanette Mutrie3, Jason M R Gill4, Paul Kelly3.   

Abstract

The capacity of physical activity (PA) measures to detect changes in PA within interventions is crucial. This is the first study to examine the responsiveness of activPAL3™ and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; Short Form) in detecting PA change during a 12-week group-based, men-only weight management program-Football Fans in Training (FFIT). Participants wore an activPAL3™ and completed the IPAQ pre- and post-program (n = 30). Relationships between change scores were assessed by Spearman's correlations. Mean or median changes in PA were measured using paired samples t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Responsiveness to change was assessed utilizing Standardized Response Mean (SRM). Both device-based and self-report measures demonstrated significant changes pre-post intervention, although these changes were not significantly correlated. The SRM values for changes in activPAL3™ metrics were: 0.54 (MET-mins/day); 0.53 (step counts/day); and 0.44 (MVPA/day), indicating a small to medium responsiveness to change. SRM values for changes in IPAQ scores were: 0.59 (for total PA mins/day); 0.54 (for total MET-mins/day); 0.59 (for walking MET-mins/day); 0.38 (for vigorous MET-mins/day); and 0.38 (for moderate MET-mins/day), revealing a small to medium responsiveness to change. These findings reveal that two commonly used device-based and self-report measures demonstrated responsiveness to changes in PA. While inclusion of both device-based and self-report measures is desirable within interventions it is not always feasible. The results from this study support that self-reported measures can detect PA change within behavioral interventions, although may have a tendency to overestimate changes compared with device-based measures on absolute values, but not standardized response values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometer; adults; intervention; physical activity measurement; questionnaire; sensitivity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32395706      PMCID: PMC7212021          DOI: 10.1123/jmpb.2019-0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Meas Phys Behav        ISSN: 2575-6605


  53 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

Authors:  Cora L Craig; Alison L Marshall; Michael Sjöström; Adrian E Bauman; Michael L Booth; Barbara E Ainsworth; Michael Pratt; Ulf Ekelund; Agneta Yngve; James F Sallis; Pekka Oja
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations.

Authors:  Dianne S Ward; Kelly R Evenson; Amber Vaughn; Anne Brown Rodgers; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  P Margaret Grant; Philippa M Dall; Sarah L Mitchell; Malcolm H Granat
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  [Responsiveness of outcome measures].

Authors:  María Jesús García de Yébenes Prous; Francisco Rodríguez Salvanés; Loreto Carmona Ortells
Journal:  Reumatol Clin       Date:  2009-01-04

6.  Responsiveness to Change of Self-Report and Device-Based Physical Activity Measures in the Living Well With Diabetes Trial.

Authors:  Winnie Y H Lee; Bronwyn Kay Clark; Elisabeth Winkler; Elizabeth G Eakin; Marina M Reeves
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2014-09-22

7.  Evaluating the Responsiveness of Accelerometry to Detect Change in Physical Activity.

Authors:  Alexander H Montoye; Karin A Pfeiffer; Darijan Suton; Stewart G Trost
Journal:  Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci       Date:  2014-01-01

8.  Agreement between the IPAQ and accelerometer for detecting intervention-related changes in physical activity in a sample of Latina women.

Authors:  Virginie Nicaise; Noe C Crespo; Simon Marshall
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2013-04-05

Review 9.  Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristina Kowalski; Ryan Rhodes; Patti-Jean Naylor; Holly Tuokko; Stuart MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Considerations when using the activPAL monitor in field-based research with adult populations.

Authors:  Charlotte L Edwardson; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Danielle H Bodicoat; Tom Yates; Melanie J Davies; David W Dunstan; Genevieve N Healy
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 7.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.